Started By
Message

re: Alabama Senate passes abortion ban bill

Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:49 pm to
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Honest question, how can you possibly review the last 15 years or so of fetal research, with much improved testing techniques, tools, etc than we had before, and not come away with the conclusion that a fetus is a human being?


Who said a fetus is not a human being?

Either way, I don't know why you're limiting this to "fetal research." I suspect it's because you don't have nearly the understanding of the research you're trying to imply.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

If it makes it to the Supreme Court there is a ZERO chance Roe v Wade gets overturned.
FIFY
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 10:06 pm
Posted by SD Tider
San Diego
Member since May 2019
2500 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

quote:
That doesn’t work if you believe that a fetus is a human life though.


That's only true if you say that human life has the same value regardless of the current stage of development. Most educated people don't say that.



Educated people are only as good as their arguments and shouldn’t be relied on. Peter Singer correctly argued that if this were true than infanticide and forced euthanasia of the elderly would be perfectly acceptable. Taken even further, extreme eugenics programs can be justified using this logic.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69267 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

I suspect it's because you don't have nearly the understanding of the research you're trying to imply.


The atlantic: science is giving the pro-life movement a boost

Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35463 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

If it makes it to the Supreme Court there is a very good chance Roe v Wade gets overturned


Doubt it.

SC treats Roe as the gold standard in stare decisis.

It's as if its been written into the Constitution to the SC.

Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21857 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:55 pm to
100% support!

There are many ways to not get pregnant.

1. Abstinence
2. Don't have sex during the 14 days of the cycle where you can get pregnant
3. Birth Control Pills
4. IUD
5 Day after pill
6 Condoms
7 Spermicide and Diaphragm
etc

Get pregnant and don't want the baby, then give it up for adoption.
There are literally 2 million couples who are waiting to adopt a baby in the US. The majority of whom will even agree to pay the mothers medical bills.

There are around 40 couples waiting per baby put up for adoption.


Posted by SD Tider
San Diego
Member since May 2019
2500 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:56 pm to
Why do you think there is zero chance it gets overturned, just out of curiosity? It’s fairly well agreed upon in legal case study that Roe v Wade was a flawed decision. The court seems to be split just about down the middle. Seems like a 50/50 shot to me?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

don't insult research and empiricism by claiming it is a "clump of cells"
That language is simplistic rhetoric for simple-minded people, much like “beating heart” and “can feel pain.”. There are simpletons on each side of this complex issue.
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Educated people are only as good as their arguments and shouldn’t be relied on. 


Educated people are informed and more often rely on data to make their arguments. Uneducated people rely on things like emotion, religion, and groupthink. I know which arguments I typically find more compelling.

quote:

Peter Singer correctly argued that if this were true than infanticide and forced euthanasia of the elderly would be perfectly acceptable. Taken even further, extreme eugenics programs can be justified using this logic.


Your agreement with those arguments does not make them correct or logical.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

What's the difference between aborting a zygote and shooting an adult in the head? Is that really your question?
Yes, they really believe this.
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:06 pm to
Thank you for supporting my assertion that you don't fully understand the research you're referencing.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

There are around 40 couples waiting per baby put up for adoption.
This explains all the kids stuck in foster care with no hope of adoption.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69267 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Educated people are informed and more often rely on data to make their arguments. Uneducated people rely on things like emotion, religion, and groupthink. I know which arguments I typically find more compelling.
Abortion isn't a scientific debate, though. When you get down to it. It is ultimately a moral/"rights" debate.

It is a debate over which is more important/has more value: the life of a budding human being or the autonomy of an adult female.

Science's role in the abortion debate, if there is any, involves researching fetuses and such.

The statement "a woman has a right to her body" and "unborn children have rights to life" are not scientific statements. They are emotional statements.
Posted by Muleriderhog
NYC
Member since Jan 2015
3116 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:10 pm to
fricking ridiculous; it will get bitch slapped down by the supreme court. 0% chance Roe v Wade gets overturned either.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Why do you think there is zero chance it gets overturned, just out of curiosity? It’s fairly well agreed upon in legal case study that Roe v Wade was a flawed decision. The court seems to be split just about down the middle. Seems like a 50/50 shot to me?
Stare Decisis and the nature of the legal mind.

A majority of the new Court MIGHT incrementally chip-away at Roe, give a reasonable statute to allow them to do so. This ridiculous law will get nothing but a guffaw from the Court. They might not even grant cert after the CoA strikes it down.
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Yes, they really believe this.


What's perhaps most amusing is that sometimes in the same post, they'll claim that their position is really all about science.

Then, to show you they're right, they link some right-wing trash article filled with the same ridiculous assertions worded slightly better.
Posted by Muleriderhog
NYC
Member since Jan 2015
3116 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

If you truly believe the fetus is a human being worthy of the right to life as protected by our laws, you have to support a blanket ban on abortion. Why should one fetus have a right but not another fetus? 

All of you advocating for forcing a women who's been raped to carry out the pregnancy are piece of shite human beings.
Posted by Boks
Red Lodge, MT
Member since Jul 2013
1121 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:13 pm to
GOP and Dems will make a shite ton of campaign contributions from this. Dems with their post-birth abortion stuff and GOP with total abortion bans. Money about to start flowing for them both.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21857 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

There are around 40 couples waiting per baby put up for adoption.



There are only around 100k children in the foster care system who are eligible for adoption.

My wife and I had 5 of our own children and we took in 2 additional children for over 10 years.


This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 10:16 pm
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Muleriderhog


Did you grow up in a foster home.

Nothing wrong with that , I was just wondering.

You seem angry that you weren't aborted.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram