- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ahmaud Arbery murder suspects seek to ban Confederate flag license plate from evidence
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:28 am to Azkiger
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:28 am to Azkiger
quote:
He told me that the owner did no such thing.
Are you claiming the police report from the owner is top secret? Because every recent police report from the neighborhood was gone through (as one of your earlier posts even noted).
1
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:39 am to doubleb
quote:
the other guy has to prove what he says and you don’t.
I provided Him proof that the homeowner never filed a police report. Every other local news outlet reported the exact same thing but they are all lying or it is their “interpretation.” Dude is a fricking clown.
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 9:40 am
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:46 am to Azkiger
The homeowner”s attorney also stated to multiple news outlets that no police report was ever filed. Is that the lawyers “interpretation too?”
Posted on 10/8/21 at 10:00 am to mouton
quote:
I provided Him proof that the homeowner never filed a police report. Every other local news outlet reported the exact same thing but they are all lying or it is their “interpretation.” Dude is a fricking clown.
Yes, and he’s trolling you.
He makes you prove everything, argues about your sources and then says he died by have to prove anything because the burden of proof is on you.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 10:15 am to doubleb
He is making a fool of himself and knows yet he continues to stick to his guns. 
I am curious if he will have the nerve to show his face again after making an arse of himself.
I am curious if he will have the nerve to show his face again after making an arse of himself.Posted on 10/8/21 at 10:28 am to mouton
More facts will come out at the trial.
I think the two yahoos were out of control, and deserve punishment for what they did. But the DA has to prove that in court. The defendants will have to present their side if the story.
After its all out there perhaps we will learn something we didn’t know. That’s usually the case.
I think the two yahoos were out of control, and deserve punishment for what they did. But the DA has to prove that in court. The defendants will have to present their side if the story.
After its all out there perhaps we will learn something we didn’t know. That’s usually the case.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 10:44 am to mouton
quote:Yes he was .
He was not on probation at the time
quote:LINK
five years of probation for carrying a gun onto the high school campus in 2013, a year after graduation, and shoplifting from a Walmart store in 2017, a charge that extended that probation up until the time of his death.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:33 am to rb
quote:
Yes he was .
You are right. I was thinking of his original probation and forgot the Walmart incident extended it.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:47 am to the808bass
quote:
Are you claiming the police report from the owner is top secret?
No. Just that just because you don't hear the media talking about it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
It took a good year+ for police reports to surface about his "jogger" excuse when caught inside people's homes. He even had earned the nickname "the jogger" in his own neighborhood because of his crappy excuse.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:49 am to doubleb
quote:
So you state things as fact
How do you get that from me saying "if the property owner has reported items stolen"?
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:50 am to mouton
quote:
Is that the lawyers “interpretation too?”
If you have a direct quote from the lawyer saying as much, no.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:51 am to Azkiger
quote:
Just that just because you don't hear the media talking about it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Correct. And Pluto could be made of provel cheese.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:53 am to mouton
quote:
You are right. I was thinking of his original probation and forgot the Walmart incident extended it.
Shut up you hack, you've been wrong about quite literally everything (immediate knowledge, case law for immediate knowledge, the law only requiring intent, whether past behavior can be used to determine intent, etc.) save the gun pointing in the video.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:54 am to the808bass
This thread has moved far away from the original question of whether or not the Confederate flag license plate should be allowed as evidence
Just saying
Just saying
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:55 am to the808bass
quote:
Correct. And Pluto could be made of provel cheese.
My bad, this occurred exactly how the media portrayed it. There's no facts of the case left out intentionally (besides the ones I just mentioned) to alter public opinion. Not sure why I'm being so skeptical on the matter...
Posted on 10/8/21 at 11:57 am to Azkiger
I understand your skepticism.
But you can’t base an argument on an absence of evidence here.
But you can’t base an argument on an absence of evidence here.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:00 pm to L.A.
quote:
This thread has moved far away from the original question of whether or not the Confederate flag license plate should be allowed as evidence
Just saying
Yea sorry about that. I'll stick to the topic as I don't think any of the common posters here have left anything off the table. At this point we're rehashing the exact same thing.
I understand how unpopular of an opinion this will be, but I don't have an issue with the license plate being used. Racial prejudice does exist below the systemic level, and if they can piece together enough evidence through social media posts and the like I don't see why the courts should disallow it.
That said, I also think Arbery's past records are fair game and should be allowed. Pretty sure the judge didn't allow those records to be presented though.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:03 pm to icutmyownlawn
quote:
For what? Arbery grabbed the shotgun. He literally tried to disarm a man holding a shotgun. It's on video.
He wasn't getting out of their alive. He did what he thought was his best chance of surviving.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:05 pm to the808bass
quote:
But you can’t base an argument on an absence of evidence here.
Having family in the residential and commercial construction business, and having helped out a crap ton, for me installing cameras, motion sensors, then contacting neighbors when you get hits on either suggests things were being stolen. Arbery had a long history of jogging and stealing, he was caught there at least twice (one confirmed camera shot was him, and Travis McMichael confronted him there two weeks prior). To me, I'm just putting two and two together.
So I wouldn't say it's complete absence.
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 10/8/21 at 12:11 pm to Powerman
I haven’t found a poster who brings up this “he tried to grab the gun” argument who admits that the gun was pointed at him before he grabbed it. Nor do they want to discuss the fact that Roddie Bryan hit Arbery with his vehicle prior to the final confrontation.
LINK
quote:
In the Glynn County courtroom Thursday, Dial described how investigators had examined Bryan’s pickup truck and found a dent, white cloth fibers from Arbery’s shirt, and handprints.
LINK
Page 19 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News