- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 10/8/21 at 6:44 am to Azkiger
Yes if someone enters a construction site with a bag and begins putting items in the bag you can prove intent even though nothing was stolen. If someone is just walking around no. Past criminal convictions are into relevant because you can’t prove what intent was on that day.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 6:46 am to Azkiger
The source is the homeowners statements and those of the police.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 6:51 am to mouton
quote:
Past criminal convictions are into relevant because you can’t prove what intent was on that day.
Now who doesn't understand intent? Patterns of behavior are absolutely a criteria used to determine intent in courts of law.
Modus Operandi, I know you've heard the term. Are you arguing in good faith or just trolling. 100% honest question.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 6:52 am to mouton
quote:
The source is the homeowners statements and those of the police.
Show me the quote where the Homeowner said he never reported anything stolen from that property to police.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 6:55 am to Azkiger
You doubted me on the video and you are doubting me on this. Google is your friend.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 6:58 am to mouton
I have googled, can't find what you're speaking of.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:02 am to Azkiger
This is staring to get boring.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:09 am to mouton
quote:
"I don’t want it to be put out and misused and misinterpreted for people to think that I had accused Mr. Arbery of stealing or robbery. Because I never did."
Is the quote.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:22 am to Azkiger
quote:
English said he doesn’t believe that Arbery stole anything from his property and he did not file any previous police reports
Good lord dude. What part of “he did not file any previous police reports “ do you not understand?
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:31 am to mouton
quote:
Good lord dude. What part of “he did not file any previous police reports “ do you not understand?
That was the authors interpretation of the quote that followed.
You've never watched a crappy local news segment where a reporter is telling you what happened, summarizes what one witnesses said, then the camera immediately cuts to that one witness saying what the reporter just summarized?
All he said was that he never accused Arbery of stealing something of his.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:32 am to Azkiger
"Also, when are you going to confront the lie you made about past criminal behavior not being relevant to determining intent, waaaaaaa!"
This post was edited on 10/8/21 at 7:35 am
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:40 am to Azkiger
You are one dumb mother fricker. You think the local news station was lying when they said English said he had not filed any previous reports???
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:47 am to mouton
No, I think that was his interpretation. That very well may be the idea the property owner was trying to convey, but that's not the only way to interpret that quote.
Don't act like news agencies, even local, don't make errors. Even just looking at this case look at how many stations and outlets carried the jogger narrative. Sometimes people don't lie, they're just mistaken.
Don't act like news agencies, even local, don't make errors. Even just looking at this case look at how many stations and outlets carried the jogger narrative. Sometimes people don't lie, they're just mistaken.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:51 am to L.A.
Privilege is wearing $300 sneakers when you’ve never had a job. Privilege is wearing $200 Apple Airpods while living on public assistance. Privilege is having a Smartphone with a Data plan which you receive no bill for. Privilege is needing your own version of the National Anthem and then calling yourself an American. Privilege is living in public subsidized housing where you don’t have a utility bill and where rising property taxes and rents and energy costs have absolutely no effect on the amount of food you can put on your table. Privilege is having free health insurance for you and your family that's paid for by working people who can't afford health insurance for their families. Privilege is having multiple national organizations promoting and protecting your race that's subsidized by federal tax dollars. Privilege is having access to a national college fund that supports only your race. Privilege is having a television network that supports only your race. Privilege is the ability to go march against, and protest against anything that triggers you, without worrying about calling out of work and the consequences that accompany such. Privilege is having as many children as you want, regardless of your employment status, and be able to send them off to daycare or school you don’t pay for. Privilege is the ability to commit any crime you want knowing at the end of the day the headline will read "STILL AT LARGE"
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:55 am to Azkiger
quote:
quote:
The property owner never reported anything stolen to the police.
Source?
Where’s your source proving that the property owner reported did report stolen property?
Posted on 10/8/21 at 7:59 am to doubleb
quote:
Where’s your source proving that the property owner reported did report stolen property?
I don't have anything saying either way. I've only stated what I think has occurred based on other facts (the owner setting up cameras, motion sensors, and being in close contact with neighbors about people snooping around).
My comment that got Moron all pissy was stating that intent could be grounded if the property owner has reported items stolen from that property in the past. He told me that the owner did no such thing. He has the burden of proof in that exchange.
Posted on 10/8/21 at 8:44 am to Azkiger
quote:
He has the burden of proof in that exchange.
What more proof do you need?
Posted on 10/8/21 at 9:25 am to Azkiger
quote:
I don't have anything saying either way. I've only stated what I think has occurred based on other facts (the owner setting up cameras, motion sensors, and being in close contact with neighbors about people snooping around).
So you are assuming things because you think you know what happened.
quote:
My comment that got Moron all pissy was stating that intent could be grounded if the property owner has reported items stolen from that property in the past. He told me that the owner did no such thing. He has the burden of proof in that exchange.
So you state things as fact that haven’t been proven to back up your opinion, but the other guy has to prove what he says and you don’t.
LMAO
You the man! You belong in kangaroo court.
Page 18 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News