- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AG of MO Eric Schmidt tells the FBI to stay away for CCW holders and stay out of MO
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:50 am to stout
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:50 am to stout
While I did enjoy the written tongue lashing he gave Wray in that letter...
He did not say that he would stop the fbi from doing anything or that he intended to do so.
It basically says we don’t like you, here’s why, and your actions will break MO law.
So when the fbi shows up in counties and accesses the records, whether with or without the sheriffs’ consent, then what?
He did not say that he would stop the fbi from doing anything or that he intended to do so.
It basically says we don’t like you, here’s why, and your actions will break MO law.
So when the fbi shows up in counties and accesses the records, whether with or without the sheriffs’ consent, then what?
0
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:55 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The Platte County Sheriff’s Office was one of several sheriff’s departments chosen for an audit by the FBI of concealed carry weapons (CCW) permits.
This was in your article that you posted.
And then this…
quote:
Some of the information in your email leads us to believe that portions of the audit may seek information or the review of records which would be in violation of Missouri law.” Holland goes on to say that “While our office has no problem providing information related to ensuring our compliance with applicable CJIS (Criminal Justice Information Services) security regulations, we cannot violate the laws of the State of Missouri in the process.” Holland told The Landmark that “Obviously, any information requested as part of the audit that doesn’t violate Missouri law or infringe on any rights of citizens such as security protocols, identification of our personnel, things of that nature, will be responded to appropriately.”
Did you even read your link?
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 9:57 am
Posted on 8/11/22 at 12:52 pm to SeeeeK
Definitely the good Eric.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:07 pm to stout
Is missouri not a constitutional carry state?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:51 pm to stout
I’d like red state governors to expel all members of the FBI from their states and close down any facilities they’ve been using.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:20 pm to stout
He could have just written to Wray that the Missouri law prevents disclosure, case closed.
Glad to know the AG has the back of the citizens, but the grandstanding was unnecessary political posturing.
Glad to know the AG has the back of the citizens, but the grandstanding was unnecessary political posturing.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:21 pm to notsince98
It is.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:23 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
nor would the CJIS Division retain information beyond what is necessary to address a specific compliance concern
I don't even think the gnome guy is stupid enough to believe this. You've lost it, Mickey.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
“At no point would auditors require access to lists such as state approved concealed carry holders, nor would the CJIS Division retain information beyond what is necessary to address a specific compliance concern.”
Just trust us bro. Let us in. We're from the FBI and we're here to help keep you safe.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News