Started By
Message

re: AG Merrick Garland to give a briefing at 1:30 CT

Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8689 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:59 pm to
Well it's blown past 1:56 PM and still no Merrick Garland. You reckon there's some tension and raised voices behind that curtain.

Maybe something like this......

Garland: You SOBs got that judge to sign that f*****g search warrant without my approval. Now I've got to go out there and lie to save you and all our asses.

DOJ Senior Attorney: Merrick. Please calm down. Simple solution. Just lie. We can deal with the fallout from the lie later. Listen we need a video of Trump getting cuffed and stuffed before the mid-terms. Don't you go f*** this up by going religion on us.

Garland: Okay. Where's makeup?

This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 2:03 pm
Posted by PollyDawg
Member since Jul 2021
1103 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

According to Fox just now, GOP congressmen have been "warned" to "pull back" in the rhetoric because


Because only dims are permitted to engage in rhetoric.

Not only that, they're allowed to plant evidence and lie under oath with no fear of consequences, then swear it's all true on their televised media-circus-sham-investigation/kangaroo court - without being challenged.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133215 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

I think they have the warrant but the info pertaining to the warrant is sealed.




That would make sense.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
13165 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

FOX is reporting it hard, citing Newsweek


I'm not saying that it's not being reported.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
25889 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

This is a lie. No leadership at the lower level would be willing to go rogue and do this on their own without telling their higher ups. Absolute BS.



Not trying to start a fight here, serious question. Would Garland be involved in that decision making process at all or would the FBI Director Christopher Wray be the top person making the decision?
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
13165 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

That would make sense.


Yeah, targets aren't normally privy to that.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58419 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

On the government side, the warrant is still under seal, although there is an action filed by the press to unseal the warrant. I don't think Trump is bound by the seal order, though.


The warrant would tell you nothing. The part under seal is what needs to be released.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
26133 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Only 30 minutes late. NBD.


Late, prepared statement will be read, and no questions will be allowed. SOP for this Regime.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83585 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
Media running with the "WH had no knowledge" ruse, which everyone knows is a lie, which means whatever is happening is probably a continuation of something stupid and unpopular and unbecoming of a first world country (hence the WH wanting no connection).
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
13392 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:00 pm to
So what is happening
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
8773 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:01 pm to
There’s a 0% chance the AG would not know that a former presidents house was going to be raided.

They can lie all they want, no one will believe that.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 2:01 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
157116 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:01 pm to
Gartland IS PROBABLY late because the WH called Garland and changed their mind on what they want him to say. Because they realized how dangerous this was and the world thinks we are derelict Venezuela.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
10726 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Would Garland be involved in that decision making process at all or would the FBI Director Christopher Wray be the top person making the decision?

There is 0% chance that both of them were not involved.

Update: Garland to speak for 5 minutes and take no questions.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
29578 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Would Garland be involved in that decision making process at all or would the FBI Director Christopher Wray be the top person making the decision?


Seriously Mickey? You can bet the WH knew as well...
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58419 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Not trying to start a fight here, serious question. Would Garland be involved in that decision making process at all or would the FBI Director Christopher Wray be the top person making the decision?


The decision to execute a warrant against a former president? Surely you'd want top level sign-off before doing such a thing, right?

ETA: If this was a decision that didn't go through every possible channel, then people would already have been publicly fired.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 2:04 pm
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
15787 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Not trying to start a fight here, serious question. Would Garland be involved in that decision making process at all or would the FBI Director Christopher Wray be the top person making the decision?



I would assume that before any move is made against a former President everyone (DOJ, FBI, AG, WH) would have their ducks in a row.

Thats why the "we didnt know" bullshite is getting laughed at. No lower level agent is going to do that without prior approval.

And if it did happen then that agent needs his arse handed to him.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83585 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

There’s a 0% chance the AG would not know that a former presidents house was going to be raided.

They can lie all they want, no one will believe that.




Same for the WH. Maybe they didn't outright tell Biden just so he could maintain that denial, but zero chance Klain or someone else close to Biden didn't have knowledge of it.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
43850 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:03 pm to
Probably not even Wray under normal circumstances. I would imaging some tier of management below the director could greenlight a raid. However, this is a former President, so I dont think there's an agent alive who does this without permission, or even direction, from the WH.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
157116 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:03 pm to
Yeah heard that as well-- that Garland and WH didn't know.

This makes them look even more dumb. And Biden looks like a hack weak shitty POTUS>

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133215 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:03 pm to
2 minutes.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram