- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AG Merrick Garland to give a briefing at 1:30 CT
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:49 pm to TBoy
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:49 pm to TBoy
quote:
seems to suggest that Trump's people have the warrant and have no plans to release it.
I know y'all's supposition seems to be that there's some damning reason they won't do so, but what do you think that might be?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:50 pm to Paddyshack
It’s taking him a while to get his story straight, looks like.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:50 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Don’t understand why Trumps people won’t release warrant or security footage if it is what they are claiming…
Unless we’re in 6D chess mode.
Unless we’re in 6D chess mode.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:50 pm to TBoy
quote:
“No, we’re not releasing a copy of the warrant,” NBC News quoted a source close to Trump as saying.
I don’t know if you can’t read or just can’t understand.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:50 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I think they have the warrant but the info pertaining to the warrant is sealed.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:51 pm to TBoy
quote:
seems to suggest that Trump's people have the warrant and have no plans to release it.
This is a serious question, because I don't know. If a warrant is sealed by court order is a party to the warrant able to legally publish it without the court okaying it?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:51 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I know y'all's supposition seems to be that there's some damning reason they won't do so, but what do you think that might be?
Why on earth would they think it prudent to share the warrant? What good would be gained?
This isn't Trump's investigation, he's just the target.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:51 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Don’t understand why Trumps people won’t release warrant or security footage if it is what they are claiming…
Unless we’re in 6D chess mode.
If they believe this might end up in court, why would they release anything until they are actually in court?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:51 pm to Decatur
quote:
Why does Trump surround himself with such stupid people? Everyone is on tv saying they didn’t get a copy of the warrant, but his attorney, Christina Bobb is on a Dinesh podcast saying she got a copy at the end of the raid. WTH??? I mean why can’t he put a gag on his peeps? Dinesh: Bobb interview Apparently the interview is an hour long, but he breaks it up in like five minute segments.
I posted this yesterday.
Now I heard on Fox News that there were two Trump attorneys with fbi.
I don’t understand how Team Trump cant get their s*** together.
Have a conference call, gather information, decide on a message and who will deliver.
That’s why the dims always win, they are much more organized and coordinated.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:52 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
If they believe this might end up in court, why would they release anything until they are actually in court?
If it exonerates Trump, what does it matter when? Evidence will be the same now or later. Will help piss people off if it’s what they are claiming.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:52 pm to hnds2th
The idea that they didn't get a warrant is pretty silly and I don't know where it spread from.
It doesn't hurt to have the warrant, why is anyone making a big deal out of this?
It doesn't hurt to have the warrant, why is anyone making a big deal out of this?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:52 pm to imjustafatkid
Baier just said the WH had no prior knowledge of this press conference? What a shite show if true
FOX also had a constitutional lawyer that said AG Garland said he had no knowledge of this and that he left these decisions to be made to lower level agents? No way that is true right? I haven't seen that anywhere
FOX also had a constitutional lawyer that said AG Garland said he had no knowledge of this and that he left these decisions to be made to lower level agents? No way that is true right? I haven't seen that anywhere
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:53 pm to Lsut81
quote:
If it exonerates Trump, what does it matter when?
You're dealing with a corrupt federal government. Playing your hand too early gives them time to cook up lies in response.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:53 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
FOX also had a constitutional lawyer that said AG Garland said he had no knowledge of this and that he left these decisions to be made to lower level agents? No way that is true right? I haven't seen that anywhere
That's 100% nonsensical.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:53 pm to PaperTiger
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:53 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I know y'all's supposition seems to be that there's some damning reason they won't do so, but what do you think that might be?
If I had a theory it would just be speculation. Speculation isn't worth anything. For something that may be important like this, I'd like to see the source documents.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:53 pm to PaperTiger
this has become an SLN skit
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:53 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
The idea that they didn't get a warrant is pretty silly and I don't know where it spread from.
It doesn't hurt to have the warrant, why is anyone making a big deal out of this?
It was never a question of did a warrant exist. People want to know what supporting information/documentation was used to obtain the warrant.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:54 pm to jonnyanony
They didn’t get a warrant until it was over is what is being claimed…. So lawyers weren’t able to watch and ensure they only took what warrant allowed.
That is what is being claimed.
That is what is being claimed.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:54 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
Baier just said the WH had no prior knowledge of this press conference? What a shite show if true
FOX also had a constitutional lawyer that said AG Garland said he had no knowledge of this and that he left these decisions to be made to lower level agents? No way that is true right? I haven't seen that anywhere
I can't believe either. The WH not knowing about the press conference is more believable than the other but neither are true. I mean, Jesus, could you imagine some low level office okaying a raid on a former President without someone like the AG even being given a heads up? It's laughable.
Back to top
