- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AG Merrick Garland to give a briefing at 1:30 CT
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:23 pm to SlidellCajun
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:23 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I don’t see this ending well for Trump.
I've heard this since 2015. So far, it's gone pretty well for Trump.
Ultimately, we're gonna know what was in that warrant.
1
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:24 pm to RuLSU
Garland didn’t answer the most important question, which was why a warrant as opposed to a subpoena.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:24 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:They were there for 9 hrs.
the Justice dept knew exactly what they wanted and must have had a real good idea where to find it.
They were fishing.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:24 pm to udtiger
quote:
excuse me. I'd like to hear more about this because if so, then the whole fricking exercise is illegal. but, of course, they did the same thing to the FISA court, so no biggie, right?
Newsweek report from yesterday citing “confidential high ranking government officials” who said that they had an informant and that the informant info was the basis of the affidavit. That the informant told them the docs were in the safe. Post raid, these same officials said there was nothing in the safe that was of interest.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:24 pm to RuLSU
quote:
Imagine you're wrong. What if Trump had access to technical specs for national defense equipment - and what if he were trying to sell it?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to RuLSU
quote:
Imagine you're wrong. What if Trump had access to technical specs for national defense equipment - and what if he were trying to sell it?
THEY GOT HIM NOW BOYS!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to udtiger
quote:
ETA: I hate the feds and think this was horseshite, but there's a "good faith" safe harbor for these things and the mere fact the informant relied upon was wrong would not make the search invalid.
Now, if the feds KNEW the informant was full of shite before they went to the judge for the warrant, that's another story.
But if they had specific information like that, and the warrant was "narrow in scope" like Merrick just lied, then the warrant would have specifically been for the safe.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Why so, you think?
I would if I was him. Garland wouldn’t have this press conference if they didn’t have something no matter how small.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to SingleMalt1973
quote:
Look on Garlands face and cracking voice tells me they found jack.
Yep, that cracking Chicago "Da Bears" stupid Polack accent. What a clown this stupid fvck wad is.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to RuLSU
quote:Lol at this dumbass
What if Trump had access to technical specs for national defense equipment - and what if he were trying to sell it?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:25 pm to Scruffy
So if Garland was gonna order it why can he just tell us what was in the warrant and affidavit? Must not look to good for DOJ?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to Scruffy
quote:
They were there for 9 hrs.
And supposedly focused on three spaces: a bedroom, an office, the basement.
That’s a lot of time in Melania’s wardrobe!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
Here’s my issue with all of this Trump knows what they were looking for. If he wanted, he could release the info and if it was in his best interest- he would do just that. Clearly it’s not in his best interest to do so. That’s not good. The other thing is- the Justice dept knew exactly what they wanted and must have had a real good idea where to find it. They could not afford to have egg on their face. I don’t see this ending well for Trump.
have you been under a rock the last 6 years?
They were beating their chests for years over Russia collusion and they didn’t have shite. Or how about the tape of trump dropping the N bomb? Sam Harris swore he had heard it and he’s a super duper honest intellectual.
This raid narrative fell apart in 24 hours and you think they got him now?
This isn’t about the raid. This is about baiting a violent response so garland can do what he’s been wanting to do.
He will be able to use the patriot act on all those “domestic terrorists” out there
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
They need you to keep believing.
Low-TBoy is a douche. He still thinks Russian Collusion was real and Hunter Biden's laptop was fake.
He's definitely got his indoctrination from DU.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to RuLSU
quote:
I don’t see this ending well for Trump.
quote:
I've heard this since 2015. So far, it's gone pretty well for Trump.
Those that love Trump will always love Trump. Nothing he does, says or doesn't do or say matters. Anyone who proclaims Trump is finished is obviously on drugs. Even after he dies there will be a large number of people who will want him to run in the next election.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Seriously, have you met a liberal yet that is not 100% convinced that Trump is an arch-criminal, and just one more investigation will blow the case wide open? I havent.
In today's case of Future Proves Past, just 3 posts below this someone is purposing that possibly Trump had technical plans for military defense equipment that he was preparing to sell to terrorists or some other bad actor.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to RuLSU
quote:
Imagine you're wrong. What if Trump had access to technical specs for national defense equipment - and what if he were trying to sell it?
quote:
We'll see over the next few days as the warrant is unsealed.
Prediction: it will be HIGHLY redacted.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:27 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
But if they had specific information like that, and the warrant was "narrow in scope" like Merrick just lied, then the warrant would have specifically been for the safe.
correct.
what the warrant says will be important. if it was only to search the safe, then the 9 hours and multiple boxes is outside the scope (and would likely not be subject to "within view" exception)
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:27 pm to RuLSU
quote:
technical specs for national defense equipment
The Clinton's, Obama and Biden have already sold this information to China.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:27 pm to hnds2th
quote:
Garland didn’t answer the most important question, which was why a warrant as opposed to a subpoena.
We already know that: they produced a subpoena in April.
Page 16 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News