- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Abortion rights activists plan protests outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:16 pm
quote:
Abortion rights activists are planning to protest outside of the homes of the conservative justices on the Supreme Court after a leaked draft of a majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was published earlier this week.
Ruth Sent Us, a progressive activist organization, posted on their website that they will be protesting outside the homes of the six conservative justices on May 11.
“At the homes of the six extremist justices, three in Virginia and three in Maryland. If you’d like to join or lead a peaceful protest, let us know,” the site reads.
The planned protests come after Politico published the leaked draft written by staunch conservative Justice Samuel Alito that states the court would overturn Roe v. Wade, effectively ending federal protections for abortions. The opinion would move the decision on abortion down to the states.
Following the report, the Supreme Court said that the draft, which was penned in February, was authentic, but that a final decision has not yet been made on the matter.
Another group, Shutdown DC, announced a vigil at Alito’s house on Monday, May 9.
“Justice Alito thinks he can take away our rights. But our rights are fundamentally ours. We’re showing up to tell him in person,” the tweet read.
The tweet included a graphic with the location of the justice’s house.
When asked about previous protests outside of the justices’ homes on Thursday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki dodged the question.
“I think our view here is that peaceful protests — there’s a long history in the United States, in the country of that. And we’ve certainly encouraged people to keep it peaceful and not resort to any level of violence,” Psaki said when asked if the president would discourage protesters from going to the justices’ homes.
The six conservative justices are: Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts.
When asked if the White House condoned posting justices’ addresses online, Psaki said: “The president’s view is that there’s a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across this country about what they saw in that leaked document,” Psaki said.
“We obviously want people’s privacy to be respected. We want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. That is certainly what the president’s view would be.”
LINK
This post was edited on 5/7/22 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:18 pm to jatilen
Is Congress allowed more protection than those.
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:24 pm to jatilen
quote:you mean if he weren't a potato brain
That is certainly what the president’s view would be.”
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:25 pm to jatilen
Piss balloons —> balloon launcher
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:41 pm to jatilen
Stupid bitch on the left's sign should read "Guns have more rights than my unborn child". I pity the fool that sticks his dick in one of those weaponized vaginas.
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:44 pm to jatilen
quote:
six extremist justices
So ruling against killing babies is an extremist viewpoint?
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:49 pm to RTRinTampa
quote:
Stupid bitch on the left
Gun rights are protected by the constitution, her nasty vagina is not.
What an ignorant fricking argument by these lunatics
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:49 pm to jatilen
I’m noticing the nonsensical, long-time “pro-choice” tag is starting to be dropped in favor of what it really is: pro-abortion or “abortion rights”.
I’m pretty sure if by some miracle of God, that 100% of pregnant women started making the “choice” in favor of life, there’d by some highly pizzed off radical Progstains.
They’d be seething.
I’m pretty sure if by some miracle of God, that 100% of pregnant women started making the “choice” in favor of life, there’d by some highly pizzed off radical Progstains.
They’d be seething.
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:52 pm to jatilen
Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice.
Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
Let the little children come on to me for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
Let the little children come on to me for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
Posted on 5/7/22 at 7:04 pm to jatilen
I'll eagerly await the formation of the May [x] Commission.
Physically intimidating the highest court of the land? Meh.
Protest at the Capitol Building? SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR ENEMY COMBATANTS. NO TRIAL FOR YOU!
Physically intimidating the highest court of the land? Meh.
Protest at the Capitol Building? SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR ENEMY COMBATANTS. NO TRIAL FOR YOU!
This post was edited on 5/7/22 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 5/7/22 at 10:04 pm to jatilen
This just means that pro-life groups can counter-protest at the same locations.
As Mills Lane used to say, "Let's get it ON"!
As Mills Lane used to say, "Let's get it ON"!
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 6:58 am
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:44 am to jatilen
The Abortocentrists have overplayed their hand. The leak and now open harassment and intimidation of USSC justices AT THEIR HOMES is a bridge too far.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:55 am to jatilen
Protesting in front of the courthouse is fine, but doing it at their residences is bullshite and that should be put to a stop. I know if I was a neighbor, I would water TF out of my lawn and pressure wash my sidewalk all damn day.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:01 am to jatilen
Abortion rights protesters should be exactly like anti abortion protesters. No more, no less.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:22 am to touchdownjeebus
These protesters aren’t even acting in good faith. RvW doesn’t do what they claim, and removing it doesn’t end abortion.
Women have choices. No one is denying them any rights. No one.
Women have choices. No one is denying them any rights. No one.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:50 am to TBoy
quote:
Abortion rights protesters should be exactly like anti abortion protesters.
Will you condemn the pro-abortion “activists” for their actions at the Catholic Church in NYC?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:05 am to jatilen
Those gun/body/vagina signs crack me up.
If the same regulations and restrictions on guns (and FFLs) were placed on women and abortion providers, they'd howl.
If the same regulations and restrictions on guns (and FFLs) were placed on women and abortion providers, they'd howl.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:08 pm to jatilen
The question is: Will the law be enforced if they protest near the justices' residences?
By law, it is illegal to picket, protest, or otherwise attempt to sway a judge or justice in the performance of his or her duties when discharging a case or making a ruling. This includes picketing or protesting near a justice's home, neighborhood, subdivision, etc.
Let's see if the left is as quick to declare these protesters an insurrection as they were to make that declaration on Jan 6, 2021. Of course, I'm not holding my breath or taking any bets.
By law, it is illegal to picket, protest, or otherwise attempt to sway a judge or justice in the performance of his or her duties when discharging a case or making a ruling. This includes picketing or protesting near a justice's home, neighborhood, subdivision, etc.
Let's see if the left is as quick to declare these protesters an insurrection as they were to make that declaration on Jan 6, 2021. Of course, I'm not holding my breath or taking any bets.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:19 pm to TidenUP
quote:
So ruling against killing babies is an extremist viewpoint?
100%
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News