Started By
Message

Abortion rights activists plan protests outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes

Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:16 pm
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:16 pm

quote:

Abortion rights activists are planning to protest outside of the homes of the conservative justices on the Supreme Court after a leaked draft of a majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was published earlier this week.

Ruth Sent Us, a progressive activist organization, posted on their website that they will be protesting outside the homes of the six conservative justices on May 11.

“At the homes of the six extremist justices, three in Virginia and three in Maryland. If you’d like to join or lead a peaceful protest, let us know,” the site reads.

The planned protests come after Politico published the leaked draft written by staunch conservative Justice Samuel Alito that states the court would overturn Roe v. Wade, effectively ending federal protections for abortions. The opinion would move the decision on abortion down to the states.

Following the report, the Supreme Court said that the draft, which was penned in February, was authentic, but that a final decision has not yet been made on the matter.

Another group, Shutdown DC, announced a vigil at Alito’s house on Monday, May 9.

“Justice Alito thinks he can take away our rights. But our rights are fundamentally ours. We’re showing up to tell him in person,” the tweet read.

The tweet included a graphic with the location of the justice’s house.

When asked about previous protests outside of the justices’ homes on Thursday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki dodged the question.

“I think our view here is that peaceful protests — there’s a long history in the United States, in the country of that. And we’ve certainly encouraged people to keep it peaceful and not resort to any level of violence,” Psaki said when asked if the president would discourage protesters from going to the justices’ homes.

The six conservative justices are: Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts.

When asked if the White House condoned posting justices’ addresses online, Psaki said: “The president’s view is that there’s a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across this country about what they saw in that leaked document,” Psaki said.

“We obviously want people’s privacy to be respected. We want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. That is certainly what the president’s view would be.”


LINK
This post was edited on 5/7/22 at 6:26 pm
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64661 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:18 pm to
Is Congress allowed more protection than those.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

That is certainly what the president’s view would be.”
you mean if he weren't a potato brain
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30136 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:25 pm to
Piss balloons —> balloon launcher
Posted by RTRinTampa
Central FL
Member since Jan 2013
5532 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:41 pm to
Stupid bitch on the left's sign should read "Guns have more rights than my unborn child". I pity the fool that sticks his dick in one of those weaponized vaginas.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14433 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

six extremist justices


So ruling against killing babies is an extremist viewpoint?
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
7950 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Stupid bitch on the left


Gun rights are protected by the constitution, her nasty vagina is not.


What an ignorant fricking argument by these lunatics
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Member since Jul 2019
4398 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:49 pm to
I’m noticing the nonsensical, long-time “pro-choice” tag is starting to be dropped in favor of what it really is: pro-abortion or “abortion rights”.

I’m pretty sure if by some miracle of God, that 100% of pregnant women started making the “choice” in favor of life, there’d by some highly pizzed off radical Progstains.

They’d be seething.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12182 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 6:52 pm to
Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice.
Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Let the little children come on to me for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31501 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 7:04 pm to
I'll eagerly await the formation of the May [x] Commission.

Physically intimidating the highest court of the land? Meh.

Protest at the Capitol Building? SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR ENEMY COMBATANTS. NO TRIAL FOR YOU!
This post was edited on 5/7/22 at 7:05 pm
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34681 posts
Posted on 5/7/22 at 10:04 pm to
This just means that pro-life groups can counter-protest at the same locations.

As Mills Lane used to say, "Let's get it ON"!
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 6:58 am
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25003 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:44 am to
The Abortocentrists have overplayed their hand. The leak and now open harassment and intimidation of USSC justices AT THEIR HOMES is a bridge too far.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24835 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:55 am to
Protesting in front of the courthouse is fine, but doing it at their residences is bullshite and that should be put to a stop. I know if I was a neighbor, I would water TF out of my lawn and pressure wash my sidewalk all damn day.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23720 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:01 am to
Abortion rights protesters should be exactly like anti abortion protesters. No more, no less.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25003 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:22 am to
These protesters aren’t even acting in good faith. RvW doesn’t do what they claim, and removing it doesn’t end abortion.

Women have choices. No one is denying them any rights. No one.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34161 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Abortion rights protesters should be exactly like anti abortion protesters.


Will you condemn the pro-abortion “activists” for their actions at the Catholic Church in NYC?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98851 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:05 am to
Those gun/body/vagina signs crack me up.

If the same regulations and restrictions on guns (and FFLs) were placed on women and abortion providers, they'd howl.
Posted by Swamp Angel
Georgia
Member since Jul 2004
7297 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:08 pm to
The question is: Will the law be enforced if they protest near the justices' residences?
By law, it is illegal to picket, protest, or otherwise attempt to sway a judge or justice in the performance of his or her duties when discharging a case or making a ruling. This includes picketing or protesting near a justice's home, neighborhood, subdivision, etc.

Let's see if the left is as quick to declare these protesters an insurrection as they were to make that declaration on Jan 6, 2021. Of course, I'm not holding my breath or taking any bets.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14154 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:14 pm to
Wood.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36219 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

So ruling against killing babies is an extremist viewpoint?


100%
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram