- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A&M student kicked out of class for objecting to transgender lesson
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:15 pm to SpecialK_88
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:15 pm to SpecialK_88
What do you suppose would happen if another professor taught completely opposite of that?
And used The Holy Bible to back up that claim?
How do you tink that would be perceived?
What that person is teaching can't even be called a lesson. It's 100% factually incorrect. It'd be like me being a Science professor and demanding my class accept that Gravity is not a real concept.
And used The Holy Bible to back up that claim?
How do you tink that would be perceived?
What that person is teaching can't even be called a lesson. It's 100% factually incorrect. It'd be like me being a Science professor and demanding my class accept that Gravity is not a real concept.
2
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:15 pm to texag7
I would be livid if I sent my kid to a college and they are cramming this fricking bullshite down their throats. This is bullshite
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:18 pm to texag7
quote:
A&M student kicked out of class for objecting to transgender lesson
INSANITY
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:20 pm to Oddibe
quote:There are arguments on both sides as to whether Trump could legally withhold funds based upon non-compliance with his EO, but that is a very different question from whether the actual instruction is "illegal."
I’m pretty sure that A&M is required to obey the executive order if in fact that are receiving federal funds.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:21 pm to riccoar
quote:
It'd be like me being a Science professor and demanding my class accept that Gravity is not a real concept.
Exactly, in that case you should leave the class and file a complaint to have it dealt with by the school, rather than throw a tantrum and then try to get the governor to fire the professor.
This just seems like someone wanting their 5 minutes of fame.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:23 pm to texag7
quote:
Audio of Texas A&M President defending the need to teach LGBTQ courses... to train future "school superintendents."
This x headline is a little misleading and taken out of context. He also said psychiatrists and clinical counselors. He was referring to people in these fields having to deal with students in those areas.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:25 pm to riccoar
quote:Except that it is nothing like that.
It'd be like me being a Science professor and demanding my class accept that Gravity is not a real concept.
Yes, physical sex is immutable. You will get no argument from me. Based upon the "unicorn" graphic, I don't think you would get any argument from Professor McCoul, either.
But absolutely everything else on that graphic is subject to legitimate debate and examination ... in the appropriate course.
Isn't college SUPPOSED to be "about" learning to think and analyze and come to your own conclusions, or (in your mind) is it just a trade school?
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:34 pm to texag7
Hillary Clinton said that the transgender push would end the democrat party. I can't think of one thing I like about her, but I do believe she was correct on this. The gender ideology thing pushes itself too much. Sooner or later, those who used to roll their eyes will vote to push this stuff away, esp. from children.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:35 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
But absolutely everything else on that graphic is subject to legitimate debate and examination.
No, it 100% is not. The "Other" category does not exist in reality.
And why would we be indoctranating 3-12 year olds that there is a real "Other" column.
In true modern day reality, "Other" is called make believe.
Yes, Little Johnny, you could in fact be Sasquatch. And if you say you are, we will gladly start calling you Bigfoot.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:39 pm to texag7
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:41 pm to riccoar
Do you realize that you are advocating for EXACTLY the sort of one-sided "indoctrination" that you accuse "them" of supporting, just on the other side of the coin?
I'm NOT saying that you aren't entitled to present your arguments and evidence. Quite the contrary. You SHOULD be able to do so, just as they should ... and the better-reasoned argument should prevail in the court of public opinion.
But not in a course on Children's Literature.
I'm NOT saying that you aren't entitled to present your arguments and evidence. Quite the contrary. You SHOULD be able to do so, just as they should ... and the better-reasoned argument should prevail in the court of public opinion.
But not in a course on Children's Literature.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:47 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
if this is taught at all, it should be in a masters psychology and behavior disorder class.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:47 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Telling children their sex is what they are born with is not indoctrination.
It's science and biology FACT.
Telling them they can magically and medically change is it is not science, biology, or fact.
Children should have zero interest with anything in the Other column. And teaching them that at that age is criminal and absolutely indoctrinating them.
The fact that would even be in discussion before puberty is mind blowing. Only a pedophile would believe it was appropriate
It's science and biology FACT.
Telling them they can magically and medically change is it is not science, biology, or fact.
Children should have zero interest with anything in the Other column. And teaching them that at that age is criminal and absolutely indoctrinating them.
The fact that would even be in discussion before puberty is mind blowing. Only a pedophile would believe it was appropriate
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:49 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
RelentlessAnalysis
Ag, what came of this story?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:51 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
I believe the issue was the syllabus did not accurately describe what was being taught. Also, the prof and dept had been warned before about this shortcoming. He was try to skirt the rules.
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:55 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
But absolutely everything else on that graphic is subject to legitimate debate and examination
Not really.
You are a male, a female, a hermaphrodite (an incredibly small percentage), or a crossdresser.
Hank, you have exposed yourself (again) with your defense of the indefensible.
Please leave the children alone.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 12:55 pm to idlewatcher
quote:Professor McCoul was terminated. The faculty review committee issued a unanimous report that her termination was "without cause," but the TAMU administration upheld the termination anyway and refused to reinstate her.quote:Ag, what came of this story?
RelentlessAnalysis
McCoul hired a Dallas law firm, and has supposedly sued the University (though I cannot find the lawsuit).
As far as I know, the overall issue has not yet been resolved.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:02 pm to jimmy the leg
You are an inherently dishonest person, aren't you?
I am not discussing "children" in this thread. To the contrary, I have said that it was entirely inappropriate to include of the Gender Theory elements in the Children's Literature course.
What I am discussing is whether a university should be able to offer coursework addressing issues of gender identity and sexual attraction and examining those issues from all sides.
I find your knee-jerk reaction against even DISCUSSING those issues at the COLLEGE level ... entertaining.
I am not discussing "children" in this thread. To the contrary, I have said that it was entirely inappropriate to include of the Gender Theory elements in the Children's Literature course.
What I am discussing is whether a university should be able to offer coursework addressing issues of gender identity and sexual attraction and examining those issues from all sides.
I find your knee-jerk reaction against even DISCUSSING those issues at the COLLEGE level ... entertaining.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:12 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Professor McCoul was terminated. The faculty review committee issued a unanimous report that her termination was "without cause," but the TAMU administration upheld the termination anyway.
McCoul hired a Dallas law firm, and has supposedly sued the University (though I cannot find the lawsuit).
As far as I know, the overall issue has not yet been resolved.
Sounds like an antifa type infiltration into the school system.
Infiltrate the government and school system.
Land jobs that are hard to be removed from.
Spew poison.
Donate your proceeds (mutual aid) to anticapitalist revolutionary groups.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:41 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Was this professor employed by the Executive Branch of the US government? If not, she was ot violating federal law.
As the newly self-appointed Board Monitor of Spelling, Grammar, and Detail - it is troublesome that you missed this - after your edit. Of course, I am sure with posting I am guessing over 20 entries per day one could miss this slight error - which is amplified by your recent aforementioned self-appointed position. Perhaps an assistant is in order?
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News