Started By
Message

re: A three-judge panel of the DC Appeals has issued an emergency stay blocking GJ release

Posted on 10/29/19 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65132 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 6:54 pm to
I bet Neopolitan wishes he would have withheld his opinion a few more seconds, lol. Dude has been wrong so much, I bet FOX thinking about Shep’ing him...
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

How so?


LINK
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
38145 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 6:55 pm to
All three judges on panel appointed by Obama, they will rule to turn over GJ material. We are headed to the SC.
Posted by airlinehwypanhandler
Airline Highway
Member since Feb 2019
2130 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

All three judges on panel appointed by Obama, they will rule to turn over GJ material. We are headed to the SC.




Sundance at CTH agrees

TheLastRefuge
?

quote:

@TheLastRefuge2
Following Following @TheLastRefuge2
More
After the House votes to authorize the ‘impeachment inquiry’, I think the appeal will fail.

Lawfare has the DOJ beat on this one.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162354 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

A federal circuit court on Tuesday evening temporarily blocked the release of grand jury materials from former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election meddling in the 2016 election.

A three-judge panel, all Obama appointees to the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, suspended a lower court’s Wednesday deadline in order to give the judge in that case — Chief Judge Beryl Howell — extra time to consider the merits of a recent DOJ request.

The DOJ on Monday asked Howell, an Obama appointee to the U.S. District Court in Washington, to hold off enforcing her pivotal ruling last week which ordered the agency to provide the documents to the House Judiciary Committee by Wednesday. DOJ's broader request to Howell is that she suspend her order indefinitely while the Trump administration formally asks the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to reconsider whether it must disclose the grand jury materials to Congress at all.

The appeals court in their ruling today said the purpose of its stay was to give Howell “sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion” by DOJ. The judges noted that their temporary suspension of the lower court’s deadline “should not be construed” as a ruling on the merits of the agency’s request.

The appellate court order means the Mueller grand jury materials will continue to be shielded from House Democrats’ view for the time being.

The Democratic impeachment inquiry may key in on themes that Mueller explored in his nearly two-year investigation: President Trump’s possible obstruction of justice and his campaign’s interactions with Russia during the 2016 election. If so, the fight over access to Mueller’s grand jury materials, as well as related exhibits and transcripts, could help shape the course of the inquiry.

LINK
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94733 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:24 pm to
It's easy to engage in hyperbole with these sorts of issues, but it is no exaggeration that this would be one of the worst precedents in all of criminal justice history. Folks would be able to lawyer up. GJ testimony would be subject to cross examination.

I mean, if it is going to be out there, then all due process must apply at that point.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

This whole thing isn’t about a single phone call


Well, your star witness today only references the phone call.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23894 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

All three judges on panel appointed by Obama,


THIS is why Odumbf*ck and Dingy Harry invoked the Nuclear Option - to pack the D.C. Circuit court with far, far, far left wing politicized whackjobs for situations just like this.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

It's easy to engage in hyperbole with these sorts of issues, but it is no exaggeration that this would be one of the worst precedents in all of criminal justice history. Folks would be able to lawyer up. GJ testimony would be subject to cross examination.


The very fact that GJ falls under “section 6e” was the reason I was so confident that Will Wade was going to survive Yahoo Sports/Alleva/Dawkins trial shite show last spring.

The SC has to slap this down. Has to. If not this will bite EVERYONE in the arse not just Trump now.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:56 pm to
It was pretty obvious this was never going to win on appeal.

The entire idea that "well, because we REALLY want it" is a valid reason was fricking stupid.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

THIS is why Odumbf*ck and Dingy Harry invoked the Nuclear Option - to pack the D.C. Circuit court with far, far, far left wing politicized whackjobs for situations just like this.


100% correct.
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4600 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:10 pm to
They also don't want to expose red-state dems by going on record in support of this charade. Especially since they are going to look like a bunch of petty assholes when it all shakes out.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20725 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

The executive branch needs to step up and restore the will of the people by force. That any fool in a black robe can just whimsically make rulings like they do, especially the SC deciding policy for 300+ million people....



I agree to some extent BUT the reason I lauded the Judicial Branch to step forward is that the squabble is a question of legality between the other two branches. In that case, Judicial basically is the arbiter Constitutionally for matters such as this. Not a perfect system but it's by far the best yet.
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
6760 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:53 pm to
I thought both sides would want to see the Grand Jury interviews.

I would like to see them.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13366 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Fill us in please.

Crickets
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram