Started By
Message

re: A prayer to SATAN.

Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26966 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Listen to this frickin' guy.

He’s right.

Unless you want to make this an expressed Christian theocracy, then including prayer of one type opens the door for prayer of any type.

I’m not offended by sincere Christian prayer in almost any setting. I think far too many public setting are far more performative than sincere, but that’s another story.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44496 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

You are all satanists.



And you continue to prove yourself to be a fricking idiot with every single post you make.

It will be nice when midterms are over and your poli-board shill contract has expired and you frick back off to the Rant and spare us of your idiocy.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41406 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:



And I don't necessarily disagree, but you were injecting something into a statemen,t trying to pigeonhole it and turit n into an argument that you wanted to have because you all prepared with your points.


Now I can argue that this nation is indeed a Christian nation founded upon Judeo-Christian ethics because that's clearly in the writings,
not only the official writings
but the writings of the Founding Fathers who wrote the official documents.

And in doing so they did not choose one particular branch of Christianity they made the effort this specific effort in their writings to point out that it was just a sense of the Creator God
the Judeo Christian God


your attempts to interject the denomination of the faith into the argument is irrelevant

because it was irrelevant to the Founding Fathers


Please, tell me more about how the founding fathers were part of something that only started less than 100 years ago.



Posted by OWLFAN86
Arrogant Dickweed
Member since Jun 2004
199113 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

. I think far too many public setting are far more performative than sincere, but that’s another story.
and it pisses me off
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484832 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Got to be some town near the University of Iowa or Iowa State.


The Iowa chapter doesn't seem to have an address, so I'm guessing it's online mostly.

This is the same group who did this at the capitol in Iowa a few years ago



Here we go again: Banning unpopular religious displays is not the solution

quote:

The latest example leaves me shaking my head, not just at the events themselves but at the reactions. Mrs. Gentry, my history and government teacher in high school, would be dismayed by intelligent people misunderstanding one of the foundations upon which the United States was established — that foundation being the desire of people for intellectual freedom.

How I wish I could still drop by the Gentry home, park myself on Mrs. G’s couch and dive into an in-depth conversation with her and Mr. G about the events that transpired in recent days at the Iowa Capitol. Some people’s mistaken notion of what religious freedom involves has brought the spotlight to Iowa from as far away as Great Britain’s BBC.

The trigger for all of this attention was the decision by the Satanic Temple of Iowa to temporarily erect a small altar with candles and a caped, ram’s-head figure representing the pagan idol Baphomet. The display was off the Capitol rotunda next to the grand staircase, not far from where another group placed the traditional Christian nativity scene.

Faster than you could slide down a chimney, controversy boiled up.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44496 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

You seem confused as to both what's happening in OP, their beliefs, and this conversation.

I didn't say I was laughing at you. It seems like you read it that way


No, dumbass, let me walk you through your own idiotic "logic." When you say that they do this to "laugh at people like me", you're saying that it is my fault that they are doing this. And still not acknowledging that you have been dead wrong all along about the prevalence of Satanism within our society.

It's very simple. First you started blaming the Christians and then when you were called out on it you started blaming ME. For refusing to admit your own frickin error.

Everyone is at fault except SFP. It is the definition of narcissism.
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
4650 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:24 pm to
I’ve been to Ottumwa Iowa. This actually makes sense because that town is literally hell.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41406 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

And you continue to prove yourself to be a fricking idiot with every single post you make.

It will be nice when midterms are over and your poli-board shill contract has expired and you frick back off to the Rant and spare us of your idiocy.


You think someone who is selling you a shite sandwich is going to market it that way?

Any religion that teaches you do not have to keep the commandments is not of God.

Whose world do you think you live in?



Posted by Jebadeb
Member since Oct 2017
6028 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Now I can argue that this nation is indeed a Christian nation founded upon Judeo-Christian ethics because that's clearly in the writings,
not only the official writings
but the writings of the Founding Fathers who wrote the official documents.


What is Judeo-Christian as opposed to simply Christian?
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44496 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

You think someone who is selling you a shite sandwich is going to market it that way?

Any religion that teaches you do not have to keep the commandments is not of God.

Whose world do you think you live in?


We are not doing this again, dipshit. We have had this exact conversation before. You were wrong then and you remain wrong now. Your tropes are fricking boring, man.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
8653 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Right, but this guy is just another edge lord making a "point" about separation of church and state.

It should be outlawed. I don't care if it's unconstitutional.

Edit: SATANISM should be outlawed, for my downvoters

He is a former council member and a current member of the church of satan.

After he finished, the city council tooks steps to "cleanse the curse" he spoke
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111990 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:27 pm to
Why is Iowa the big flashpoint for this silliness?

Is it really just the whitebread wholesome Midwestern types that make these people seethe the most?
Posted by OWLFAN86
Arrogant Dickweed
Member since Jun 2004
199113 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:27 pm to
I could attempt to offer my knowledge and then horribly type it or my speech impediment from the stroke interferes with voice-to-text, so I just used AI

ENJOY READING

Most American colonies and early independent states required public officials, assembly members, and delegates to be Christian or profess specific Protestant or Christian beliefs in order to hold office.

Colonial Rules and Religious Tests

• Office Requirements: Most British-American colonies enforced religious test laws, meaning that lawmakers, representatives, and civil officers had to swear oaths affirming Christian doctrine or belong to the official state-established church.
• Established Churches: Eight of the thirteen colonies had official state-supported churches, such as the Church of England (Anglican) in the South or Congregationalist churches in New England. Dissenters or non-Christians were frequently barred from public office or political delegation.
• Early State Constitutions: When the colonies declared independence, several new states kept these religious tests. For example, the 1776 Delaware Constitution required officeholders to declare faith in the Trinity and the divine inspiration of the Scriptures. Other states like Maryland required belief in the Christian religion, while New Jersey and Georgia specified Protestantism.

Shift to the U.S. Constitution

• Article VI: To prevent a national religious requirement, the framers added the No Religious Test Clause in Article VI, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, banning any religious test as a qualification for federal office.
• State Phase-Out: Individual states gradually removed their own religious test requirements for state and local office over the subsequent decades.



The bolded parts are my two specific points that the framers of the Constitution Founding Fathers were indeed Christian;

the second point illustrates how those people avoided the establishment of an offical religion and the establishment of a federal government did not specifically say one denomination
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41406 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:27 pm to
quote:


We are not doing this again, dipshit. We have had this exact conversation before. You were wrong then and you remain wrong now. Your tropes are fricking boring, man.


I don't remember you. But ok.

Why do you not want to admit whose world this is?
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26966 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

and it pisses me off

Prepare for all the downvotes from the linear thinkers convinced you are wholesale denigrating prayer and/or Christianity.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44496 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

He is a former council member and a current member of the church of satan.


These fricking idiots will tell you that when they profess allegiance to Satan and even attend the church of Satan that they are not actual Satanists. And I'm not shitting you here. SFP has pulled this shite many times. "They're just edgelords" despite them literally attending the church of Satan.

It's the craziest shite you'll ever see. These people actively run interference for Satanists.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
41406 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

I could attempt to offer my knowledge


You could start by attempting to answer the actual things being said.

How were the founding fathers part of something that didn't exist until the 1930s.

Posted by OWLFAN86
Arrogant Dickweed
Member since Jun 2004
199113 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:32 pm to
quote:


Prepare for all the downvotes from the linear thinkers convinced you are wholesale denigrating prayer and/or Christianity.


Exodus 20:7

So many people misunderstand and misapply The commandment not to use the name of the Lord thy God in vain

Even though it's right there in the word vainity
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
8653 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

These fricking idiots will tell you that when they profess allegiance to Satan and even attend the church of Satan that they are not actual Satanists. And I'm not shitting you here. SFP has pulled this shite many times. "They're just edgelords" despite them literally attending the church of Satan.

It's the craziest shite you'll ever see. These people actively run interference for Satanists

Every single member of the Church of Satan says they do not worship Satan.

If that is true, why name the church after him and why pray to him? That video clearly shows a prayer to him. To say otherwise is to not be truthful.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Arrogant Dickweed
Member since Jun 2004
199113 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

How were the founding fathers part of something that didn't exist until the 1930s.

Every law in this country has to pass the constitutional test
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram