- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A few interesting details on the SCOTUS rule from yesterday in scotusblog.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
For military actions.
It appears SCOTUS is saying even military actions require due process. No?
1
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:33 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
If the spirit of Satan were to occupy a profession, it would certainly be the legal profession
Tell me you hate this country without telling me.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:37 pm to loogaroo
quote:
It appears SCOTUS is saying even military actions require due process. No?
Some minimal form, yes. That's always been the law.
At the BARE minimum, the accused has due process rights of
1. Notice and opportunity to respond to the claims of the state
2. The state proving they are who the state accuses them of being
3. That you fall within the class of persons subject to the government action
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
That's not practical in an invasion.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:43 pm to loogaroo
Without those protections, nothing prevents the government from deporting citizens without any redress.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Again. What’s if China unloads 100 million people on us over the course of a few years?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:52 pm to loogaroo
They literally cannot. There isn't enough ships 
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There isn't enough ships
*aren’t
This post was edited on 5/17/25 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
You always argue about what the Dems would do in the inverse. What’s stopping them from opening the floodgates at the border now knowing that we can’t possibly process the amount of people that want in? Don’t tell me we need more judges. You and I both know it’s not practical.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:00 pm to davyjones
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’m just gonna write you a warning ticket this time. But you’d best get that taken care of. Good day, sir.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:07 pm to loogaroo
I think Kavanaugh definitely raped that girl now. He’s been totally compromised.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 10:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yep.
You either side with common sense or you hide behind the attorney bills.
You either side with common sense or you hide behind the attorney bills.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 10:50 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
We are not at war with anyone
Didn’t say we were. “Or invasion” is the wording and the US has certainly been invaded with the help of the Venezuelan government by these criminal, illegal thugs.
But the filth fights to keep them here.
Posted on 5/18/25 at 6:06 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
The incremental destruction of our constitutional republic over the past 150 years has been largely orchestrated by progressive lawyers operating within an undeniable left leaning judiciary.
Attorneys shouldn’t be allowed to serve in legislative bodies - conflict of interest.
Posted on 5/18/25 at 6:09 am to loogaroo
Burn. it. all. down.
Posted on 5/18/25 at 6:32 am to loogaroo
Sounds like a power grab by the Judiciary.
Posted on 5/18/25 at 7:54 am to funnystuff
quote:
Time for Congress to get off their arse, do their jobs, and chance our immigration laws
There are already laws on the books, but it is judges that are stopping those laws and executive actions from being effective.
So why pass a new law that some DC circuit judge or a judge in some back water federal district applies a national injunction on the matter. Our problem now is that members of the judiciary who are trying over power the presidency on national security issues.
This post was edited on 5/18/25 at 10:59 am
Posted on 5/18/25 at 8:06 am to loogaroo
quote:
Moreover, the justices added, when the Trump administration has said that it cannot “provide for the return” of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man whom the government admits was mistakenly sent to an El Salvadoran prison, the “detainees’ interests at stake are accordingly particularly weighty.”
The administration created rock solid evidence for irreparable injury in every case going forward, supporting all requests for immediate injunctive relief until a hearing can be held.
With the legal firepower in the Dept. of Justice, the administration knew this. They are actively promoting more injunctions. It isn’t the courts that are doing this. It’s the administration.
Wake up sheeple.
Posted on 5/18/25 at 8:14 am to TBoy
quote:
The administration created rock solid evidence for irreparable injury in every case going forward, supporting all requests for immediate injunctive relief until a hearing can be held.
With the legal firepower in the Dept. of Justice, the administration knew this. They are actively promoting more injunctions. It isn’t the courts that are doing this. It’s the administration.
Wake up sheeple.
This may be dumber than whatever it was I commented on that you posted yesterday.
You do greatly ease the explanation of leftists though.
"What do you mean, 'Leftists are dumbasses?"
"Look at TBoy's posts."
"Oh, right, I see what you mean."
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News