- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 79-year-old U.S. citizen files $50 million civil rights claim after car wash ICE raid
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:05 am to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:05 am to LSUTANGERINE
I said exactly what I meant. The department and agency head aren’t the proper parties to sue for a Bivens claim alleging excessive force, unless he’s trying to bring a Monell claim, which is exceedingly difficult to prove.
1
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:09 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Shouhed’s $50 million claim is a precursor to filing a lawsuit. He and his lawyers must wait six months until they can file a suit, unless the claim is rejected before then.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:10 am to LSUTANGERINE
Omg bro were literally in a police state bro literally what are we gonna do bro. Its way too hard to find legals who will work at a car wash. Literally hitler.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:11 am to LSUTANGERINE
Saw some news headline the other day about ICE using 5 year old kids to draw out illegals - pictures included! The real story is the guy led ICE on a car chase with his kid in the car, abandoned her, literally ran away while flicking the agents off, and then they went to assist the kid.
This is quite literally the goal of the left/media by inciting people, with false narratives, to confront, fight, shoot, attack, block, threaten, etc law enforcement - to make them push back/defend themselves and then scream victims of the nazi gestapo. For example, look how badly you want it :
Constant hostility towards ICE will lead to much more of this and worse. You are succeeding in your mission though, so congrats. Be sure to high five your boyfriend after some more assassins hit their marks, you get the assist on every person killed
Clown arse fagot
This is quite literally the goal of the left/media by inciting people, with false narratives, to confront, fight, shoot, attack, block, threaten, etc law enforcement - to make them push back/defend themselves and then scream victims of the nazi gestapo. For example, look how badly you want it :
quote:
Are you saying that the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Border Patrol, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement have legal authority to assault people they suspect of being in the USA illegally or employing people who are here illegally?
Constant hostility towards ICE will lead to much more of this and worse. You are succeeding in your mission though, so congrats. Be sure to high five your boyfriend after some more assassins hit their marks, you get the assist on every person killed
Clown arse fagot
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:14 am to Riverside
Nvm
This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 10:16 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:16 am to LSUTANGERINE
He won’t win a dime.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:18 am to nes2010
That’s a great point. I had forgotten that the FTCA requires pre-suit exhaustion. This entire news article is basically hysteria from the left.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:18 am to Riverside
So none of these agencies aren’t the proper ones to sue?
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
U.S. Border Patrol,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
U.S. Border Patrol,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 10:22 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:18 am to Pepperoni
quote:
Shouhed and his attorney deny these accusations, asserting he was merely trying to assist the agents.
You could be caught literally in the bank robbing money & the attorney would still say this
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:19 am to LSUTANGERINE
There are lots of negative side effects to letting in 30million illegals. Innocent Americans getting caught in the net not being the least of which. ICE is not to blame, it’s an imperfect world. The people who advocate for open boarders are to blame.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:20 am to LSUTANGERINE
Deport him to Uganda immediately. He’s illegal so it doesn’t matter.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:21 am to rocksteady
quote:
Be sure to high five your boyfriend after some more assassins hit their marks, you get the assist on every person killed
Clown arse fagot
PT gonna PT
I guess you think you “owned this lib”
quote:
Clown arse [redneck imbecile]
This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 10:22 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:24 am to LSUTANGERINE
I’m congratulating you, fagot
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:26 am to LSUTANGERINE
Should’ve slammed him harder
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:27 am to LSUTANGERINE
Correct. You have to sue the individual agents. There’s no “vicarious” liability for constitutional tort lawsuits because you have to show an intentional violation of a person’s rights by a government official acting under color of law.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:27 am to rocksteady
quote:
I’m congratulating you, fagot
Your verse is well thought out and rich.
You pass to middle school with an A-. Just a couple of points taken off for the misspelling.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:30 am to LSUTANGERINE
Did you go to undergrad the same place as me? How embarrassing for you :(
This is why you get the assist on all assassinations. Keep it up, think about it eveytime someone is killed. Congrats
This is why you get the assist on all assassinations. Keep it up, think about it eveytime someone is killed. Congrats
quote:
This entire news article is basically hysteria from the left.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:31 am to Riverside
quote:
Correct. You have to sue the individual agents. There’s no “vicarious” liability for constitutional tort lawsuits because you have to show an intentional violation of a person’s rights by a government official acting under color of law.
Let’s assume for the sake of discussion the court won’t hear this because of that.
His recourse would be to sue individuals?
Or if the court still heard the case, then he would have to prove “intentional“ violation of his rights??
Or do you see the government just settling this?
These are genuine, rather than argumentative, questions?
TIA
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:32 am to TrueTiger
quote:
You can't say that you can't breathe if you can't breathe.
If you can talk, you can breathe
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:33 am to LSUTANGERINE
Tough week for Tangeloser.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News