- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 questions about Trump J6 case that don't make sense
Posted on 8/9/23 at 8:55 am to Fat Bastard
Posted on 8/9/23 at 8:55 am to Fat Bastard
You can cite, literally, hereistheevidence.com all you want, and I’ll cite the Supreme Court’s complete lack of interest in hearing Trump’s challenges:
LINK
It’s an interesting thing to watch grown adults delude themselves into believing baseless claims from a defeated candidate to this level of cultishness. Add onto that these same people believe Trump is running “for them,” and that he will write a personal check to his campaign when his legal bills siphon off all his campaign contributions.
The zealotry for Trump is fascinating and pathetic.
quote:
Other than two Pennsylvania disputes, the justices’ decision not to hear the cases was unsurprising but ends months of legal wrangling. The court had previously taken no action in those cases and in January had turned away pleas that the cases be fast-tracked, again suggesting the justices were not interested in hearing them.
LINK
It’s an interesting thing to watch grown adults delude themselves into believing baseless claims from a defeated candidate to this level of cultishness. Add onto that these same people believe Trump is running “for them,” and that he will write a personal check to his campaign when his legal bills siphon off all his campaign contributions.
The zealotry for Trump is fascinating and pathetic.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:How is it getting weird? the term "bioweapon" and the implication the release was intentional.
What would any normal person call such research?
A laboratory created virus that led to millions of deaths around the world was leaked from a research facility in China. The fact something like that could be considered a risk of the research tells you that it should not have been happening. No benefits justify that risk as general scientific research. Would you agree?
I am not saying it was an intentional release, but I think it is abhorrent that it happened. I can state that I think it is disgusting that people deliberately tried to use it for political advantage against Trump.
The article clearly states there was motive and a forming plan in 2019 to change the election system against Trump. It is a left-leaning article obviously. If you thought the term “coincidence” was meant to be accusatory then I retract it. That wasn’t my intent.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You've never heard of unsuccessful lawsuits challenging administrative procedures?
Right, but I’ve tried the lawsuits already and they did not work out so well for me. Now I have a novel legal theory supporting a plan to impair/impede/influence a federal official proceeding. I kinda sorta think I’m in the right. Should me and my friends go forward with our plan to impair/impede/influence this official proceeding?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:00 am to texas tortilla
quote:
hey, in a D.C. courtroom with that judge, trump doesn't have a chance.
Trump will win in Florida and Georgia. He will probably win in NY. He will lose in DC because it’s a corrupt, vile place but he will eventually win it at the SCOTUS level because it’s a terribly founded case.
Then he will be POTUS again and will hopefully continue to take out all the trash.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
so there has to be court wins?
i posted the ones trump won the other day. over 50 evidentiary hearings were blocked moron. keep thinking system is not rigged. even a dumbass crackpot public defender like you should know better.
i know you are a hack chucklefrick RINO or maybe a commie at this point so then i show you a real piece of grass and then a fake piece. we need a court case to prove it? i show you mail received after a date we need a court case because you are too fricking dumb to read? The fact you deny truths that are self evident to anyone with half a brain is sad and shows your true worthless self. with zero intellectual honesty.
debunk the links dumbfrick....let's see you do it. you cannot.
if i show you a green car can you debunk it? OH NOZ WE NEED A COURT CASE AND LITIGATION TO PROVE IT IS GREEN AND NOT RED!
run back to the rant retard loser.

i posted the ones trump won the other day. over 50 evidentiary hearings were blocked moron. keep thinking system is not rigged. even a dumbass crackpot public defender like you should know better.
i know you are a hack chucklefrick RINO or maybe a commie at this point so then i show you a real piece of grass and then a fake piece. we need a court case to prove it? i show you mail received after a date we need a court case because you are too fricking dumb to read? The fact you deny truths that are self evident to anyone with half a brain is sad and shows your true worthless self. with zero intellectual honesty.
debunk the links dumbfrick....let's see you do it. you cannot.
if i show you a green car can you debunk it? OH NOZ WE NEED A COURT CASE AND LITIGATION TO PROVE IT IS GREEN AND NOT RED!
run back to the rant retard loser.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:02 am to Giantkiller
quote:
continue to take out all the trash.
What trash did he take out already?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:02 am to Colonel Flagg
quote:
A laboratory created virus that led to millions of deaths around the world was leaked from a research facility in China
Accidentally
That's the key variable you're ignoring.
Biolabs across the world have even more dangerous viruses that if released would cause even more damage. The difference is The lax standards that that particular lab and then trying to trying to avoid being blamed for it which slowed the initial response.
quote:
The article clearly states there was motive and a forming plan in 2019 to change the election system against Trum
This happens every cycle
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:03 am to Giantkiller
Some of you are truly delusional. Coming here is better than watching a good comedy on tv.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:04 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
It’s an interesting thing to watch grown adults delude themselves into believing baseless claims from a defeated candidate to this level of cultishness. Add onto that these same people believe Trump is running “for them,” and that he will write a personal check to his campaign when his legal bills siphon off all his campaign contributions.
It really has made things scary, big picture.
I didn't think there was a large enough population of dullards and cucks to have this sort of thing happen, but the Trump era has shown it is possible. Now, I'm not claiming Trump is a dictator b/c he's not smart or savvy enough to pull that off. Way too much of an emotional thinker who destroys his own momentum pretty often.
But, a version of Trump pushing Idiocracy who is more intelligent and savvy seems to have a shot at it.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:05 am to Decatur
quote:
Now I have a novel legal theory supporting a plan to impair/impede/influence a federal official proceeding
And we don't know if that plan was even legal or possible, to this day. I don't think it was, but the Supreme Court has not weighed in to set precedent.
quote:
Should me and my friends go forward with our plan to impair/impede/influence this official proceeding?
Depends on how you do it and under what theory.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:05 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
and I’ll cite the Supreme Court’s complete lack of interest in hearing Trump’s challenges:
and that does not disprove any facts that happened. see my post above to SLOW FLO RINO dipshit. I am not repeating myself. you cannot debunk shite. actually you are in denial which is sad commie. hundreds of links. have at it.
you are a grade A fricking blithering idiot thinking no fraud occured and thinking any courts would take this on which is why they blocked over 50...57 to be exact evidentiary hearings.
What they fail to account however, is that it isn't JUST Sleepy allegedly pulling 50% more of the black vote than Obama in the blackest Metro Atlanta county.
It's that, PLUS Trump winning 18 of 19 bellweather counties.
PLUS zero enthusiasm for Sleepy in turnout
PLUS 6 states simultaneously stopping counting votes of their most populous (and coincidentally?) blue-run counties
PLUS the obvious ignoring of state election law with respect to signature matching,
PLUS ballots counted w/ postmarks after state law deadline,
PLUS batch adjudication,
PLUS massive amounts of ballots requiring adjudication outside of federal guidelines,
PLUS faked accreditation of voting machines,
PLUS internet connectivity in machines that shouldn't have them,
PLUS the discovery of duplicate hard drives in voting machines
PLUS voting machine IP logs in CO showing connectivity to AZ IP addresses on election day,
PLUS voting machine maintenance logs deleted both before & after election day
PLUS flagrant violation of state laws with respect to camera surveillance on dropboxes (100+ of 159 counties in GA)
PLUS chain of custody violations in ballot collection from dropboxes
PLUS ZERO chain of custody records for ballots in states allegedly too close to call
PLUS documents required to be retained for 22 months per state/federal law destroyed/shredded/lost
PLUS illegal consent decrees enter into by state SecState (GA) with opposition party leaders to ignore signature matching
PLUS video evidence of stacks of ballots scanned & rescanned multiple times
PLUS other shenanigans from the Ruby Freeman Urban Democracy Squad
PLUS 2000 Mules data/patterns of behavior
PLUS undesirable poll watchers thrown out of counting rooms
PLUS carboard put up in the windows
PLUS nursing home residents' ballots being harvested without their consent
PLUS 100% registered voter turnout in certain states/counties
PLUS tales of "broken pipes" at State Farm Arena that didn't have anything to do with anything re: ballot counting area, but ballots were moved anyway
It's statistically impossible when you look at the totality of the "irregularities".
again see post above to slow cuck pro. youa re not worth my time loser. run back to DU.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:15 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:06 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
so there has to be court wins?
Where else do you get the legal authority?
quote:
i posted the ones trump won the other day. over 50 evidentiary hearings were blocked moron.
Trump has shitty lawyers. News at 11.
quote:
public defender
What?
quote:
i know you are a hack chucklefrick RINO or maybe a commie at this point
Small l libertarian, baw. The same as always.
quote:
The fact you deny truths that are self evident to anyone with half a brain i
And yet, no hard evidence after 2.5 years.
You are relying on faith, not logic/evidence.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:09 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
which is why they blocked over 50...57 to be exact evidentiary hearings.
Just because Trump had shitty lawyers and arguments doesn't mean the system was rigged against him.
The fact he took so many Ls should be evidence for how weak these claims were, universally. It's a much more logical analysis as opposed to this conspiratorial network of state court judges across the country of all sorts of political leanings. Ho would that sort of conspiracy even work? The judges were selected randomly...or are you claiming that too, was rigged?
Keep up the NPC'ing. Never change, baw.

Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:10 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
There is zero evidence that the election was stolen
At least none that was allowed to be seen.
quote:
Trump’s responsibility was to take his defeat like a man and turn the presidency over like every president did before him.
Isn’t this what happened??? Don’t we have the best president ever now, even though he can’t run a lemonade stand and can barely wipe his own arse?
quote:
He whined and moaned like a petulant child and should have invalidated himself completely in the process
Same as HRC. Hmmm
quote:
Little did we know that his cult following wouldn’t care what the man did, they would follow him like the Lemmings they are wherever he led them.
What exactly did he do? They “followed” him into a planned trap while he asked them to be peaceful.
You people are a cancer to this country. They should’ve burnt the mfer down and shown what a real insurrection looks like.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:11 am to SCwTiger
quote:
Same as HRC. Hmmm
did she run in 2020? What am I missing?
quote:
They should’ve burnt the mfer down and shown what a real insurrection looks like.
A bunch of obese boomers aren't doing shite, baw.
Taking away their Medicare and SS would destroy them.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:12 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And we don't know if that plan was even legal or possible, to this day.
Well as told my friends it would involve violating a federal law (but only just a little IMO). And honestly I really don’t think we have much of a chance of succeeding. But as you know…we are very desperate and willing to try almost anything to accomplish our goal.
Should we go forward?
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:14 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:14 am to SCwTiger
quote:
Same as HRC. Hmmm
Have never been able to stomach HRC but at least she had enough loyalty to the nation, something Trump knows zero about, to concede the very next day.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:15 am to Decatur
quote:
Well as told my friends it would involve violating a federal law (but only just a little IMO)
We don't know that. Cite me the Appellate or USSC case establishing this.
quote:
And honestly I really don’t think we have much of a chance of succeeding.
I mean when the USSC rules that clear statutory language of "sex" really means "gender", and that a law written in the 70s to cover biological female discrimination was intended to apply to transgender people, anything is possible in litigation.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:15 am to Fat Bastard
Glad you have nothing other than repeated NPC talking points.
Now go copy and paste your cuck list and go shine some shoes.
Now go copy and paste your cuck list and go shine some shoes.
Popular
Back to top



3







