- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 judge panel blocks Alabama redistricting efforts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:44 am to Victor R Franko
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:44 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
Hasn't USSC already ruled on this?
No.
0
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:44 am to Archives
No standing
...and this is only an attempt to delay. It's already been ruled on by the SC.
...and this is only an attempt to delay. It's already been ruled on by the SC.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:48 am to SloaneRanger
The judges want to tell everyone they fought so hard for the jackass Dem cause.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:49 am to hogcard1964
quote:
It's already been ruled on by the SC.
It hasn't though. This case is whether Alabama's legislatures map is racially based---not whether racial-based districting is legal.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:51 am to Indefatigable
quote:
It hasn't though. This case is whether Alabama's legislatures map is racially based---not whether racial-based districting is legal.
Correct. The Supreme Court has not made a ruling on this case
Posted on 5/26/26 at 10:53 am to Bandit1980
It won't matter. It's over.
Republicans are likely to appeal the decision, sending it back to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court earlier this month allowed Alabama to proceed with redistricting, kicking the process back down to the lower court.
Republicans are likely to appeal the decision, sending it back to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court earlier this month allowed Alabama to proceed with redistricting, kicking the process back down to the lower court.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:18 am to hogcard1964
When will these stupid judges understand that "diluting the black vote" is flat out an unconstitutional concept in a one man one vote Republic?
They don't get to vote in a bloc and have it counted as such. It isn't legal.A black vote cannot count more than anyone else's and that is what these cretins are trying to force.
They don't get to vote in a bloc and have it counted as such. It isn't legal.A black vote cannot count more than anyone else's and that is what these cretins are trying to force.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:20 am to antibarner
It'll be shot down later this afternoon, or at the latest by Thursday.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:24 am to Archives
quote:
that would dilute the votes of Blacks in the 2026 midterm elections.
Ignore the fact that "black" districts dilute white votes.
FYI, Caucasian/white is also a race.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:24 am to hogcard1964
People scream about No Kings....and Fascists. Well look no further then the black robed dictators that place themselves above the peoples legislature.
They assume powers never meant for them.Indeed WE should be ashamed for not marching on that court and demanding they be impeached and removed.
They assume powers never meant for them.Indeed WE should be ashamed for not marching on that court and demanding they be impeached and removed.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:25 am to antibarner
Lawfair
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:26 am to Archives
So basically F-U, SCOTUS
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:27 am to wareaglepete
quote:
It's funny with the Dems. They had 2 or 3 black candidates in the statewide primary for Governor. Who did they pick? The nastiest, sorriest, whitest guy you could ever imagine. Funny that.
Not to mention he’s a rich and lives in Mtn Brook. It’s not like he’s lives on some farm in the Black Belt.
Alabama Liberals are some of the most pretentious racists in the country.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:40 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
Hasn't USSC already ruled on this?
I believe so. There needs to be a punishment for judges that go against the Supremes. Especially when they rule about something that the SC recently ruled on. Its like these dumbasses think they are above the SC.
I dont know what kind of punishment but Id love to see the offending judges strapped down on live TV and paddled 4-5 times. They can even wear their black robe, but nothing underneath it.
A second offence should bring impeachment proceedings.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 11:53 am to Archives
quote:
3 judge panel blocks Alabama redistricting efforts
So they think they have the authority to override the Supreme Court of the United States?
That's fascinating.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:03 pm to teke184
quote:
Seems like the same problem we had to start with, which means SCOTUS will likely slap this shite down.
True but will it be in time? The left does this shite to delay hoping it isn’t settled in time to take effect for midterms
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:07 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
So they think they have the authority to override the Supreme Court of the United States?
That isn't what this opinon does. They cite to and apply Callais. Its their determination that the legislature's map is race-based within the new framework set out in Callais
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:07 pm to deltaland
quote:
True but will it be in time?
I would be surprised. The courts are hitting the line on timing--there really cannot be changes after a certain point.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:08 pm to deltaland
It’s impossible to “dilute” a vote. One person/one vote and you vote at a precinct based on your residence.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 12:10 pm to Archives
How the hell can they order them to defy the United States supreme Court?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News