re: 2000 Mules Fact Checking

quote:

---

FAKE DAWG DUMBER THAN DAWG shite

---

Lol. Ok. I am stupid.

Show me where in the movie a person goes to multiple drop boxes and NGOs.

I can draw a map with dots even as stupid as you think I am. I can tell you it happens. Proving it is different. My dots would actually align with real drop boxes which are a known thing.

I know it happens and plenty of settled cases to prove it. They didn’t prove what they said they did. I wish they would.

quote:

---

I can draw a map with dots even as stupid as you think I am.

---

No No NO. You said they didnt show this... ever.

quote:

---

RealDawg

---

Have you considered that they may be deliberately withholding additional information to lure the Left into a trap?

Seriously, relax. We got your point. The documentary did not reveal everything. Focus on what it did reveal. Which is a lot.

Democrat Michigan Election Chief Says ‘2000 Mules’ Ballot Trafficking Allegations ‘Explained by Standard Election Practices’ Officials in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas did not respond to requests for comment on the documentary

quote:

---

“The film clips involving Michigan that have been shared with the department are explained by standard election practices well within state and federal law,” said A.K. Crisp, press secretary for Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, in an email to The Epoch Times.

---

quote:

---

Over the period of May 9 through May 11, The Epoch Times asked the governors, attorneys general, and the highest-ranking election administrators in each of the five battleground states mentioned above what they thought about the evidence of large-scale election fraud presented in the D’Souza film.

---

quote:

---

Only Benson and Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, and the office of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, responded by press time.

---

quote:

---

Nessel’s office offered this terse comment, “Allegations of fraud should be reported to law enforcement for proper review.”

---

quote:

---

Brnovich did not comment directly on the movie or the activities of the 202 mules who operated in Maricopa County during the 2020 election season, as revealed in the movie. But spokesperson Katie Conner told The Epoch Times that there were ongoing investigations underway into aspects of that election.

“While we are limited in what we can say, we can confirm that several individuals have been indicted on charges related to ballot harvesting and voter fraud,” said Conner.

.

---

[/url]

This is the one path that was shown and said to be a life path of a mule. The only one they show with no video to match.

The drop box locations should be exact. They don’t match the actual drop boxes in those counties. They said the dots are drop boxes and the other marks NGOs.

If this one is their one example why not make it factual? Trash me if you want..I’ll survive. Blindly believing will never be what I do. Both sides lie. It was their job to use facts to prove what they said they had. They did provide some people dropped too many ballots. They didn’t show facts in the other. I’ll wait for that to come.

quote:

---

I'd love to hear you wax poetic about these civic-minded individuals, just doing all they can to help their poor, immobile family members participate in our most sacred privilege. You know, when they weren't burning down buildings, throwing rocks through windows, and generally rioting in the name of an overdosed crackhead.

---

I guess I missed the part in the movie where they identify each of these “NGOs”, give the address, and show how they are tied to BLM, Antifa, etc.

quote:

---

Haha. 3D chess.

---

Common sense. Why reveal your entire case?

Don't be this dumb. Focus on what you have seen. It is pretty compelling.

quote:

---

The premise of believe us we have it isn’t enough.

---

It’s enough to go through with impeachment of a president.

quote:

---

Incorrect: "Lack of Standing" not "Lack of Merit" on many cases...of course some will have lack of merit. In almost all litigation there's portions which have lack of merit....it's the "Lack of Standing" cases that are a problem. To translate, "we won't look at the facts, becuase you are not the entity who can bring this case to the court."

to confuse the two is to say someone is found "innocent" as opposed to "not guilty." They are also 2 different things.

---

fair enough and agreed. i may have been playing to fast and loose with technical terms



that said, having every (as far as i know) court challenge tossed doesn't give much credit to one's case

"To translate, "we won't look at the facts, becuase you are not the entity who can bring this case to the court."

they aren't facts until they're proven in court

First of all, they had to create this image for the film to illustrate a methodology. Cell data, in its native format doesn't look like this, so your griping about there not being more maps is a red herring. Second of all, you are asking the board to reject their box locations and accept yours. Who the frick are you? Third, this type of geolocation data is sound. Its admissible in court and often used by law enforcement. If its good enough to put a murder suspect at a crime scene than its good enough to place a mule at a drop box.

quote:

---

Blindly believing will never be what I do

---

This is exactly what you are doing. Shucking and jiving to dismiss away compelling evidence, while providing a counter argument filled with AJC fact checks and your own mysterious research.

quote:

---

Both sides

---

There's the white flag.