- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2000 Mules Fact Checking
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:02 pm to EA6B
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:02 pm to EA6B
quote:
It was pointed out that by Georgia investigators
The ones who have been scrambling to provide cover for a crooked SecState?
quote:
s the “trail” followed by the mule passed several drop boxes to stop at one located at a intersection.
Now do the NGO stops, too. Remember, it's not just stopping at a dropbox, or even a hundred of them. It's ENTERING the NGO offices, too, that gets you on the list. I'd love to hear you wax poetic about these civic-minded individuals, just doing all they can to help their poor, immobile family members participate in our most sacred privilege.
You know, when they weren't burning down buildings, throwing rocks through windows, and generally rioting in the name of an overdosed crackhead.
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 12:04 pm
2
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:03 pm to RealDawg
Holy shite are you serious?
see? I knew you were shilling
see? I knew you were shilling
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:03 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
quote: AJC
I know. Hurt my head just to read.
With the rebuttals being this easy though…the needle doesn’t move.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:03 pm to RealDawg
Fact checkers exist solely to protect the establishment narratives. Take your shite out of here
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:04 pm to RealDawg
quote:
Read 6 Fact Checking articles from news papers across the US.
Aka fake news, you brainwashed moron!
Don’t insult our intelligence with propaganda. I don’t care if you agree with it or not. Posting anything from fake news and thinking anyone has to justify the truth is bullshite.
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
You are typing out really long posts to repeat the point in your OP.
he keeps making himself look fn stupid because his fact checks are BS and spin like facebook fact checks. see my link.
he is too stupid to see if they released all names now there would be legal issues.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:04 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Now do the NGO stops, too. Remember, it's not just stopping at a dropbox, or even a hundred of them. It's ENTERING the NGO offices, too, that gets you on the list.
Agree.
Hopefully they show this factually. They didn’t in documentary. Just said it.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:06 pm to EA6B
quote:
They chose to use 10 drop box stops and 5 NGO visits, what accepted statistical methods were used to design this sample criteria and what was the confidence level? In other words why not use 20 drop box stops and and 10 NGOs, or 5 drop box stops and 5 NGOs, each of which would yield vastly different numbers?
This isn’t a serious post. Nothing you’ve posted in this thread is serious. You’re an obscurantist.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:06 pm to RealDawg
quote:
with some help from SOS
If you're swayed by that sewage fountain, then that just confirms the other posters' estimation of you: You don't want evidence. You are locked in on contrarian hand-wringing.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:07 pm to RealDawg
quote:
RealDawg
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:07 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
Fact checkers exist solely to protect the establishment narratives.
Not to mention, "fact-checkers" weren't needed until the truth started getting out....
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:08 pm to RealDawg
see, this is where you lose a frickload of credibility.
You've accepted, as truth, that a maniacally liberal organization found this one cat, and asked him if he was committing felonies. His answer was, of course, "no".
But you are bending over backward to explain away someone linked to left wing activist groups having pings within mere feet of dozens of drop boxes and 10 pings at democrat NGOs in the middle of the night.
You've accepted, as truth, that a maniacally liberal organization found this one cat, and asked him if he was committing felonies. His answer was, of course, "no".
But you are bending over backward to explain away someone linked to left wing activist groups having pings within mere feet of dozens of drop boxes and 10 pings at democrat NGOs in the middle of the night.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:10 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
At this point we have to assume that this doesn't exist.
That has been your "assumption" since day one.
Just like you "assumed" Trump was a Putin asset and the dossier was legit.
Just like you assumed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russia disinformation because a bunch of globalist hacks told you so.
Assumptions are always nice when they support what you want to be truth. Because once you assume it, you can ignore everything after.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:12 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
he keeps making himself look fn stupid because his fact checks are BS and spin like facebook fact checks. see my link. he is too stupid to see if they released all names now there would be legal issues
Keep the names.
I am about as conservative as it gets and have been directly involved in multiple conservative based lawsuits providing data backup for a law firm I do work for.
Can name call if it pleases you. Why didn’t they show multiple videos of same person at different places? Why didn’t they match cell data to an actual video? Why didn’t they show more than one path matched to drop boxes or NGOs?
These same issues are what my Federal Representative has ..who has reached out to them to try to get answers.
The job isn’t to convince ourselves. It has to be to provide facts in a way that aren’t so easily argued away.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:13 pm to Vacherie Saint
he probably denies facebook admitted in court their "fact" checks are just opinion. even tho i gave him the link.
or this:
forensic audit in AZ shows over 50k illegal votes that would turn election 5 times over
PA court declares election mail in ballots unconstitutional
WI investigating and pushing to decertify after special counsel investigation showing illegal votes.
or this:
forensic audit in AZ shows over 50k illegal votes that would turn election 5 times over
PA court declares election mail in ballots unconstitutional
WI investigating and pushing to decertify after special counsel investigation showing illegal votes.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:13 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Not to mention, "fact-checkers" weren't needed until the truth started getting out....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:14 pm to the808bass
quote:
This isn’t a serious post. Nothing you’ve posted in this thread is serious. You’re an obscurantist.
If something is going to presented as science based evidence they show show the supporting methodology.
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:15 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
But you are bending over backward to explain away someone linked to left wing activist groups having pings within mere feet of dozens of drop boxes and 10 pings at democrat NGOs in the middle of the night.
You are believing this because they said it to you. They didn’t show that in the movie. Ever.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:16 pm to RealDawg
quote:
RealDawg
FAKE DAWG
DUMBER THAN DAWG shite
Posted on 5/12/22 at 12:21 pm to RealDawg
You’d think at this point at least one person would have felt a bit guilty come forward and ratted.
Same thing with disgruntled college football players
Same thing with disgruntled college football players
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News