- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 11 shot and 1 dead in Myrtle Beach mass shooting over the weekend. No news coverage.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:36 pm to texag7
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:36 pm to texag7
quote:
Mr DEI himself makes an appearance
Yeah, he's diverted the conversation away from the fact that this shooting was committed by a black person. The truth hurts some people so they try to run away from it like he is
1
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:48 pm to Rebel
quote:
the shooting we are talking about isn't counted as a mass shooting because they don't hold a weapon properly or aim very well.
I think it is because there are 4 people shot not including the shooter. That is the definition liberal news outlets like CNN use and some government agencies.
quote:
AI Overview
The definition of a mass shooting as "four or more people shot, injured or killed, excluding the shooter, in one incident" is not the result of a single entity or a formal legal definition, but rather a common understanding adopted by many sources, including the Gun Violence Archive and CNN, USAFacts and The Violence Project. While some agencies like the FBI have used similar criteria for tracking crime data, the definition is not universally mandated or enforced.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:04 pm to blueboy
quote:
Remember - diversity is our greatest strength!
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:08 pm to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
So if 1 gang banger drivebys and kills 4 or more people, you don't consider that a mass shooting?
No that would be a mass shooting per the Dept of Justice (among others) definition of mass shooting.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:10 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Guess what happens when you change the criteria from 4 victims to 3 or 2.
Yeah, and guess what happens when you change the criteria from 4 victims to 5 or 6. No one puts the "mass" in mass shooting quite like an angry white guy.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:11 pm to Rebel
quote:
by a bunch.
Not a single person saying this has provided any data
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:12 pm to dnm3305
quote:
Go ask an ER nurse or a cop who commits more mass shootings, you stupid frick.
Will do--definitely sounds alot more scientific than actual crime stats. Which hospital do you suggest I start at?
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:15 pm to L.A.
quote:
Depends on how you define "mass shooters"
If you EXCLUDE gang violence, the numbers are as follows:
LA, look at my previous post. I have presented data and sources that don't exclude "gang violence."
quote:
Per capita, the numbers break down like this:
Beat you to this:
quote:
MUH PER CAPITA
I never made any statements about per capita. I made a very simple statement that a mass shooter in America is more likely to be white than black. I've gotten the usual simpletons saying I'm wrong. What I don't have is any data saying I'm wrong.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:16 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Weird that no one commented this way anfter any of the times there were shootings at Trump events.
There were mass shootings at these? Can you link that?
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:17 pm to FredBear
quote:
Yeah, he's diverted the conversation away from the fact that this shooting was committed by a black person.
The only reason this apolitical crime is even on the poliboard is because it was committed by a black person
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:19 pm to onmymedicalgrind
It's your lie, tell it how you want
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:19 pm to FredBear
I'm tired of winning
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:22 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:26 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Depends on how you define "mass shooters"
If you EXCLUDE gang violence, the numbers are as follows:
LA, look at my previous post. I have presented data and sources that don't exclude "gang violence."
quote:
Per capita, the numbers break down like this:
Beat you to this:
quote:
MUH PER CAPITA
I never made any statements about per capita. I made a very simple statement that a mass shooter in America is more likely to be white than black. I've gotten the usual simpletons saying I'm wrong. What I don't have is any data saying I'm wrong.
Sorry, wasn't challenging any of your data, I haven't even looked at it. And I haven't read this entire thread, but I will take a look at your earlier posts. I was just wondering why we can't find mass shooting data that includes gang violence. Seems silly to me. If your loved one is dead, does it matter if the shooter was in a gang? Why isn't that data available to the public? Someone has to be tracking it and I'm guessing that the data shows something that is politically incorrect. And I really, really hate PC nonsense when it comes to something as serious as who is killing whom.
`
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:30 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:I find it funny that your “definition” of mass shootings conveniently excludes gang shootings and only counts fatalities instead of injuries from gunshots.
I made the (obvious) statement that mass shooters are more likely to be white than black. A bunch of the PB simpletons jumped on me, but have since quivered away when presented with data.
I really don’t give a frick what some egghead libtard considers “a mass shooting.”
A mass shooting to me is 3 or more people shot in a public place, regardless of how many die.
If you don’t consider 11 people shot on a public sidewalk as a mass shooting, then you’re a fricking retard with an agenda.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:34 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Not a single person saying this has provided any data
Rocerfeller
54% of mass shootings are done by the whites. That's the total number. It conveniently omits that pesky "per capita" number you people love to ignore.
not to mention I live in Memphis and watch the nightly news. it's always them, boo boo.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:36 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Don’t hate on us because we’re much better shots.
Yeah, and guess what happens when you change the criteria from 4 victims to 5 or 6. No one puts the "mass" in mass shooting quite like an angry white guy.
Like your dead homie in Myrtle Beach, shot 11 with no fatalities, but a white cop was able to put a couple rounds in him center mass.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:42 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Wrong again.
The only reason this apolitical crime is even on the poliboard is because it was committed by a black person
I would have posted the story regardless of the race of the perp. I was shocked to read about it on X almost 3 days after it happened.
If it would have been a white dude, it would have been national headlines on Sunday.
Compare this to the FSU shooting last week. All over the news because it was a white guy and a college campus.
So because it was 11 black people shot at the beach, then the media and public should not care about it?
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:50 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
I find it funny that your “definition” of mass shootings conveniently excludes gang shootings and only counts fatalities instead of injuries from gunshots.
Its not my definition.
quote:
A mass shooting to me is 3 or more people shot in a public place, regardless of how many die.
Ok. So, given your own definition....what racial data can you link us to?
Posted on 4/29/25 at 7:52 pm to Rebel
quote:
54% of mass shootings are done by the whites.
Hmmm, so if someone made this statement:
quote:
...mass shooters are more likely to be white....
They would be correct, no?
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News