- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2 rule changes to fix CBB
Posted on 4/5/15 at 12:51 am
Posted on 4/5/15 at 12:51 am
24 sec clock
3 team TOs per game
3 team TOs per game
This post was edited on 4/5/15 at 12:52 am
8
Posted on 4/5/15 at 12:57 am to supatigah
Both moves would de-emphasize the coach's influence and provide more continuity to the game
Plus we would get a much better view of who is really an NBA prospect and who isn't
Nothing worse to me than Bo calling timeout with 7:45 left, we come back and play 12 sec then have a TV TO
Plus we would get a much better view of who is really an NBA prospect and who isn't
Nothing worse to me than Bo calling timeout with 7:45 left, we come back and play 12 sec then have a TV TO
Posted on 4/5/15 at 12:59 am to supatigah
30 second shot clock in the NIT was a nice compromise. And the teams weren't throwing shite up either. It just prevented them from sitting around for 10 seconds each possession (which might be a result of the teams with short rotations needing a break i.e Duke/Wisconsin).
Posted on 4/5/15 at 1:00 am to supatigah
The TV timeouts are awful, but I don't see them going away.
30 second shot clock and defensive 3 seconds are the only rules I want to see changed.
30 second shot clock and defensive 3 seconds are the only rules I want to see changed.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 1:06 am to Sellecks Moustache
Don't get rid of TV TO
Reduce the number of team TOs
30 sec shot clock is a move in the right direction
Reduce the number of team TOs
30 sec shot clock is a move in the right direction
Posted on 4/5/15 at 2:11 am to supatigah
Agreed. I mentioned this earlier.
It irritates the hell out of me to sit there and watch a basketball game with 12 seconds left that lasts 25 minutes to finish between the fouls and the never-ending timeouts.
It irritates the hell out of me to sit there and watch a basketball game with 12 seconds left that lasts 25 minutes to finish between the fouls and the never-ending timeouts.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 3:21 am to supatigah
I think they should go to something similar to the NBA TV timeout rule.
5 timeouts are fine but I think the 16:00 and 12:00 TV timeouts of both halves should be charged to one of the teams. Keep the 8:00 and 4:00 as TV timeouts (no team TO charged).
For example:
16:00 Timeout charged to Home Team (both halves)
12:00 Timeout charged to Away Team (both halves)
If either team calls a TO between 20:00 and 16:00 that acts as the first TV timeout and there isn't one under 16:00. If either team calls a TO between 16:00 and 12:00 that acts as the second TV timeout and there isn't one under 12:00. If there is no timeout taken in that period, charge it to the team that was not charged with the 16:00 TO.
Both teams are then left with 3 other timeouts to use as they please.
Also wouldn't mind if teams were be limited to 2 TOs under 2:00. 1 full and 1 30.
5 timeouts are fine but I think the 16:00 and 12:00 TV timeouts of both halves should be charged to one of the teams. Keep the 8:00 and 4:00 as TV timeouts (no team TO charged).
For example:
16:00 Timeout charged to Home Team (both halves)
12:00 Timeout charged to Away Team (both halves)
If either team calls a TO between 20:00 and 16:00 that acts as the first TV timeout and there isn't one under 16:00. If either team calls a TO between 16:00 and 12:00 that acts as the second TV timeout and there isn't one under 12:00. If there is no timeout taken in that period, charge it to the team that was not charged with the 16:00 TO.
Both teams are then left with 3 other timeouts to use as they please.
Also wouldn't mind if teams were be limited to 2 TOs under 2:00. 1 full and 1 30.
This post was edited on 4/5/15 at 3:28 am
Posted on 4/5/15 at 5:59 am to volfan30
All you need is one change to fix College basketball and the NBA. Stop drafting players before they are ready
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:01 am to VerlanderBEAST
Too many timeouts. It's bullshite that the last minute of a close game lasts for 20 minutes. That garbage is unwatchable. It ruins the whole damn experience....you can have an exciting back and forth game until the final minute and then you have a timeout fest.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:10 am to Prominentwon
quote:
It irritates the hell out of me to sit there and watch a basketball game with 12 seconds left that lasts 25 minutes to finish between the fouls and the never-ending timeouts.
One way to crack down on fouls is to make any foul with less than a minute left in the game a double bonus.
Maybe even start a triple bonus after a certain number of team fouls.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:14 am to supatigah
it doesn't need to be "fixed"
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:20 am to supatigah
quote:
24 sec clock
I think they should go 28, honestly. Happy medium. 35 is just too much wasted time moving the ball pointlessly around the perimeter.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:21 am to supatigah
quote:
3 team TOs per game
Johnny Jones already thought that was the rule.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 9:27 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Id like to see a 30 second shot clock like the NIT. I don't think it has to be a mirror of the NBA to be great.
I would be ok with cutting down the number of timeouts
I would be ok with cutting down the number of timeouts
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:02 am to supatigah
The number of TO's should have been addressed years ago. As far as the shot clock, I think it should be somewhere between where it is now and the NBA's 24.
A 24 second shot clock wouldn't improve the game because I think there would be just as many forced shots. Teams would struggle to get into their sets regularly within that amount of time, IMO.
A 24 second shot clock wouldn't improve the game because I think there would be just as many forced shots. Teams would struggle to get into their sets regularly within that amount of time, IMO.
Posted on 4/5/15 at 11:09 am to supatigah
I'll add that a video review of goaltending inside of 2 minutes should be instituted
Posted on 4/5/15 at 11:10 am to supatigah
30 second shot clock (if the women can handle it without being rushed the men certainly can) and widen the lane.
ETA: It's going to take more than just two rule changes to fix it though.
ETA: It's going to take more than just two rule changes to fix it though.
This post was edited on 4/5/15 at 11:12 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News