Started By
Message

re: UPDATED: Need to talk scopes. Learned the hard way.

Posted on 11/24/11 at 5:11 pm to
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20890 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 5:11 pm to
Borrow a scope and try that first to make sure its not the gun. Could be the crowning of the barrel has gotten messed up.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
56099 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 5:42 pm to
MyLSUhat's suggestion seconded.
Posted by avid lurker
houma
Member since May 2008
925 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 7:04 pm to
I shoot a meopta haven't had any problems. It a European scope with a 30mm tube . Also has a lifetime warranty for around 850
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

850

I'd barely wanna spend that much for the scope and gun
Posted by REB BEER
Laffy Yet
Member since Dec 2010
18156 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Also has a lifetime warranty for around 850


The $159 Leupold has a lifetime warranty also.
Posted by jack6294
Greater Baton Rouge Area
Member since Jan 2007
4033 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 7:52 pm to
Get it accursed at Hill Country Rifles

I'm shooting .227 inch groups at 100 yards since they worked on my Browning X-Bolt
Posted by ColesCreek
SW MS
Member since Apr 2011
378 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 9:41 pm to
I've seen the screw that goes in the forearm to attach the sling screw in too far and put pressure on the barrel, and that will cause erratic grouping. Also check that the scope mounts aren't touching where the tube starts to get bigger towards the objective lens.

If the problem is your scope, when buying a new one you get what you pay for. I only have experience with Burris, leopold, and Ziess. I've never had any problems with them. All still as clear as the day I bought them and stay on zero from year to year.
Posted by TigerOnTheRoad
South Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
318 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 10:17 pm to
Go with the new Redfield. Leupold makes them has the same warranty as is virtually the same scope as rifleman for a cheaper price
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7592 posts
Posted on 11/25/11 at 11:16 am to
lsuhat,
'Ya, I suspect you're looking at a bad scope, but a few other things I'd consider first:
1. How accurate was the gun to begin w/?
2. Have you changed loads? Not common for accuracy to deteriorate so much by changing loads, but I have seen it happen.
3. Damaged crown is a consideration, but you'd probably notice that bad of a crown.
4.Check all the screws for the base and the rings. A loose screw can cause sudden, severe deterioration.
5. What kind of base/rings are you using? I now only use a Weaver base and Burris Signature rings (Weaver type). Since I've started using the Signature rings (the ones w/ the plastic insert) I no longer lap the rings. The "turn in" type of rings can be difficult to get perfectly lined up; if not perfectly line up, there can be stress on the scope.
6. It's a good idea to make sure it's not a stock problem, e.g. loose/overly tight stock to action screws, spot on stock putting undue pressure on the barrel/action, swing swivel stud putting pressure on stock, etc.

Good luck. It's bummer having a major gun problem like this in the middle of hunting season.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
50019 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 4:28 pm to
I have narrowed it down to either the Nikon ProStaff 3x9x50 or the Redfield Revolution 3x9x50

Someone please talk me into buying either or
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 4:32 pm to
3x9x50 is a good choice. I'd probably go with the Redfield just because I've heard good things about cheap Redfield scopes moreso than cheap Nikon scopes. Though my dad did buy a Nikon Buckmaster last year when he got his new rifle and I really like it.

I'm sure the gurus will show up soon enough to steer you in the right direction
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87560 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 5:27 pm to
Nikon if I were doing it.
Posted by Nodust
Member since Aug 2010
22804 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 5:40 pm to
I have the Nikon on a .243. Like it so far. But only had it two years.
Posted by ktc227992
Member since Nov 2011
217 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 6:43 pm to
do not know much about those two and i am sure someone has suggested it you just cannot go wrong with the leupold s i have a vari x 2 and a 3 put it on them and pull the triger i have not had to readjust zero in 20 years
Posted by CootKilla
In a beer can/All dog's nightmares
Member since Jul 2007
6197 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 6:57 pm to
I have an old redfield piece of shite on my rifle. It looks like a pellet gun scope.


The thing is badass. I've been wanting to replace it for five years but everytime I look through it, it is mOney. Go with whatever you feel comfortable with.
Posted by ColesCreek
SW MS
Member since Apr 2011
378 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 7:57 pm to
I tek I read here that leopold was making the redfield scopes now, if that's the case I'd go redfield.
Posted by Judge Smails
Native Son of NELA
Member since Mar 2008
5571 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 8:05 pm to
I am a Zeiss/Leupold man but put the new Redfield on my varmint rig (.22 Hornet). I have been very pleased with it and like others have said it is now manufactured by the good folks at Leupold.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram