- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Great Outdoors and FISTFIGHTS.......(inspired by boat launch thread)
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:04 am to Jester
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:04 am to Jester
quote:See, you're doing it again.
so I make you look like an uneducated dumbass
quote:Pretty much, yeah.
Yeah, you win, big man. I'm the worst poster ever
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:04 am to AlxTgr
quote:
quote:
You are displacing roughly the same amount of water at all speeds when you are on plane unless you run on the skeg wide open
Here is where we depart. You cannot assume that. It's just not so.
quote:
You're making more wave as you speed up
If you make the above assumption, which you just cannot do.
Look at who you're responding to.... Yep, you derpa derp. I got your superiority right here, cracker.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:04 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Is this thread abouts fist fights going to lead to a fist fight?
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:06 am to Tino
quote:
Is this thread abouts fist fights going to lead to a fist fight?
Seems that way right now.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:06 am to Jester
quote:I see who it is. What's your point/
Look at who you're responding to....
quote:Good God dude. Are you 11?
Yep, you derpa derp
quote:Holy shite
I got your superiority right here, cracker.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:06 am to AlxTgr
You are making the assumption that the hull displacement is decreasing faster than your speed is increasing. Stalemate.
Renoyld's number and hull shape determine the wake produced. Reynolds number is fluid density times relative velocity times interupting surface area all divided by viscosity. Higher reynolds number equals larger wake.
Renoyld's number and hull shape determine the wake produced. Reynolds number is fluid density times relative velocity times interupting surface area all divided by viscosity. Higher reynolds number equals larger wake.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:08 am to Tino
I aint even mad about it
Im all fornspectating though.
Im all fornspectating though.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:08 am to AboveGroundPool
quote:
the same exact boat at faster speeds will displace less water
Depends on the hull geometry, but generally.
quote:
the same exact boat at faster speeds will displace less water but move water faster creating a very small wake that moves faster and dies out faster...the same boat moving at a slower speed will displace more water creating a higher wake moving at a slower speed...this is how it works
Can't disagree with this. The higher speed of the wave will degrade it more quickly. However, I'm talking about small canals (if you even read my post that started this crap). Now, would you prefer your boat slowly rise and fall while bumping the dock or slowly pound it several times in the same time? It's not an apples to apples comparison. The height of a wave is only part of its profile.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:10 am to Tino
quote:
Is this thread abouts fist fights going to lead to a fist fight?
I'm a pacifist, so probably not.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:10 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
You are making the assumption that the hull displacement is decreasing faster than your speed is increasing. Stalemate.
Renoyld's number and hull shape determine the wake produced. Reynolds number is fluid density times relative velocity times interupting surface area all divided by viscosity. Higher reynolds number equals larger wake.
He has his head way too far up his own arse to reason with him.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:11 am to Jester
He's gonna pick you apart
This post was edited on 4/26/12 at 11:14 am
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:12 am to Tino
quote:
Is this thread abouts fist fights going to lead to a fist fight?
Seems that way right now.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:13 am to Jester
quote:
Now, would you prefer your boat slowly rise and fall while bumping the dock or slowly pound it several times in the same time? It's not an apples to apples comparison. The height of a wave is only part of its profile.
i will agree that this is what would happen....BUT, this is where my basket of fricks runs out. As stated before, if you're canal is not a no-wake zone, don't expect me to idle
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:14 am to AlxTgr
Ironic thread is ironic. Fight stories werent good enough so we started our own.
FYI, my wake is only small if Im going 5mph or 55mph. Nothing inbetween. So depending on the day, I'll crawl by or fricking fly by. The mid range stuff is just rude.
FYI, my wake is only small if Im going 5mph or 55mph. Nothing inbetween. So depending on the day, I'll crawl by or fricking fly by. The mid range stuff is just rude.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:15 am to AboveGroundPool
I dont exoect you to idle past my canp. I dont expext you to even idle past me when im stopped UNLESS you have to pass close. Your wake wont bother me, i just dont wanna die.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:19 am to Jester
quote:Yeah, that's been the pattern. You don't even know when to attack, much less how.
He has his head way too far up his own arse to reason with him.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:21 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Actually I wont even agree with that all the way, a smaller wake that is dying out will not pound anyone's boat any harder than a larger slow wake would... you have a smaller volume of water pushing on the same size object, in which instance would u think it would get pounded harder?
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:23 am to AboveGroundPool
quote:
i will agree that this is what would happen....BUT, this is where my basket of fricks runs out. As stated before, if you're canal is not a no-wake zone, don't expect me to idle
Again, that wasn't even my main point originally. It was just the easy target to attack. My main issue is safety in these small canals with blind curves.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:26 am to AboveGroundPool
quote:
Actually I wont even agree with that all the way, a smaller wake that is dying out will not pound anyone's boat any harder than a larger slow wake would... you have a smaller volume of water pushing on the same size object, in which instance would u think it would get pounded harder?
The waves will hit at a significantly higher frequency, though. I'm not saying one is worse than the other, but to say summarily that one is the case is downright ignorant. Every hull is different. Every motor is different. Every prop is different. Each of those will affect the outcome. Hell, the design of the docked boat will change how it is affect by either wave.
Posted on 4/26/12 at 11:27 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I had never heard of mushing before. That's the part that drives me crazy.
Popular
Back to top



0


