Started By
Message

Speckled trout limits would be reduced for Louisiana anglers under new state plan

Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:26 pm
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
30936 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:26 pm
LINK

quote:

Louisiana's catch limits on speckled trout would be significantly reduced under a plan approved Thursday as the state seeks to address steeply declining numbers for its most popular recreational fish.

After four years of discussion on the controversial topic, the state's Wildlife and Fisheries Commission approved a plan that would:

Increase the minimum size from 12 inches to 13 inches.

Establish a maximum size of 20 inches, with two fish above that limit allowed.

Reduce the total catch per angler per day from 25 fish to 15.

Sunset the new rules by 2028 to allow for a reassessment

The plan must now undergo a public comment period and state legislators can reject it. If it moves forward, it could take effect as early as November.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:28 pm to
WHAT

ABOUT

THE

frickING

POGEY

BOATS

????????????
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81616 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:35 pm to
I like that. I have never felt great about keeping 12" trout.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29990 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

WHAT

ABOUT

THE

frickING

POGEY

BOATS

????????????



well the unstated part of this is now the pogey boats can now double the limits of game fish they currently kill indiscriminately.

it helps when the guys setting the new rules take money from, and work directly for, the pogey boat lobbyists
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
554 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 3:59 pm to
Don't mind these regulations but like other have unless if you don't do something about the pogey boats this basically amounts to putting a bandaid on a blown off arm.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

I like that. I have never felt great about keeping 12" trout.



I dont really care about the size, but there is no reason to keep 25 trout per person....15 trout per person is plenty
Posted by daberryballer
West of da Berry
Member since Oct 2015
989 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 4:53 pm to
The commissioners job is to protect the game fish...the pogey boat issue needs to be taken up with your local elected state representatives and senators . Yes pogey boats need to restricted big time so CCA and other grassroots organizations need to get out and fight to get pogey boats regulated. But you better get millions of dollars to fight dem cuz their lobbyist have millions of dollars.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29990 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

I dont really care about the size, but there is no reason to keep 25 trout per person....15 trout per person is plenty



unless you are a hypocrite why stop there, there is no reason to keep 15 trout per person.... 5 trout per person is plenty, see how easy that is?
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22298 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 5:54 pm to
Best speckled trout season in years on both sides of the state

Decreased numbers my arse.

And out of 243 trout caught in 4 trips by a total of 12 anglers, only 1 trout was caught on live bait

I estimate 1 out of 3 fish were b/w 12-13 in

There is no way I’m absorbing camp, boat, and travel expenses for this hobby when they make this official

It would be like going to the golf course and being told you can only play 11 holes. LOL

The whole recreational industry from charters to bait sales will suffer, IMO. I’ll spend my dollars on another hobby. I stopped hunting for the same reasons. Won’t be too hard
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:00 pm to
shite 1 nice one can make a meal. Let's all just keep 1 .
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164091 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

shite 1 nice one can make a meal.


Texas limits suck when when you're catching 5 17" trout you at least end up with quite a bit of meat.
Posted by speckledawg
Somewhere Salty
Member since Nov 2016
3917 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

15 trout per person is plenty


Well, that's like your opinion, man...


15 would be plenty for me, as I can go plenty often. What about someone that goes 1-2x/yr? 25 trout doesn't sound like too much in that case.

Limit shouldn't be based on what you feel is "enough" for someone.
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2419 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 9:00 pm to
How big of an impact are the pogey boats having on trout in LA? I’m not a fan by any means but I’m not sure it’s having as big of an impact on trout as many people imply
Redfish is another topic entirely
Posted by TxWadingFool
Middle Coast
Member since Sep 2014
4368 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 9:37 pm to
I've heard the same BS from some folks in Texas every time the limit gets lowered, guess what? There are more people than ever fishing in the bays of Texas. Your crazy if you think your dollars will be missed, there are plenty of sportsmen out there that do not judge the enjoyment of their trips by the number of fillets they throw in the freezer.
Posted by Saskwatch
Member since Feb 2016
16548 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

How big of an impact are the pogey boats having on trout in LA? I’m not a fan by any means but I’m not sure it’s having as big of an impact on trout as many people imply


They are removing a substantial amount of forage. When coupled with habitat loss and increasing rod and reel pressure every year I have to imagine it's putting a squeeze on the population. If all of those pogies were still in the water do you think the sharks, dolphins and other predatory species may be targeting pogies instead of speckled trout or redfish? I imagine they'd still eat their piece of the overall stock but likely not as much as we are seeing now.

Marine eco systems are greatly impacted by natural and unnatural influences. Many a tale of over fishing a forage species and the rest of the chain collapsing.

I think there are bigger influences than rec. anglers such as substantial commercial forage depletion and habitat loss. If the population is dwindling and cannot rebound then it takes some coordination in regulatory action for pogeys/ adding back marsh, shell, sand, rubble, rock reef structure/ and fine tuning recreational harvest.
This post was edited on 8/3/23 at 10:02 pm
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22298 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:57 pm to
To each his own

I spent a wknd in Cocodrie with friends from Houston. Drove all the way over here to fish and took all the filets Caught better in a wknd than they have for years in TX

They have kayaks. No need for a boat to catch a TX limit. Nobody here going to TX to fish, and if they do, it’s for one fish with size

You say every time the limit gets lowered? LMAO. Does it get lower than 5? It’s been there for decades, right? Maybe they could pass a law that you have to bring a trout with you and release it before you can catch one.

You don’t sound like a guy with a several hundred thousand dollar camp and an expensive boat that lives 2.5 hrs from the camp. More power to you driving your truck to the beach and being fulfilled by the sport alone

Im not hating on you and your level of investment. But not everyone is satisfied by just fishing. I like catching more than fishing, and I actually enjoy cleaning fish as much as eating them.

I enjoy freshwater fishing ponds the way you enjoy saltwater. I never keep any freshwater fish. I also invest next to nothing fishing local ponds.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10144 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:03 pm to
Wasn't this almost the exact same plan the politicians shot down not long ago?

Now the process starts all over? Who can possibly make money off this? Some politician/politician's family must be able to.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30496 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:08 am to
quote:

I think there are bigger influences than rec. anglers such as substantial commercial forage depletion and habitat loss. If the population is dwindling and cannot rebound then it takes some coordination in regulatory action for pogeys/ adding back marsh, shell, sand, rubble, rock reef structure/ and fine tuning recreational harvest.



Habitat degradation is the elephant in the room
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30496 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 6:10 am to
quote:

ou don’t sound like a guy with a several hundred thousand dollar camp and an expensive boat that lives 2.5 hrs from the camp. More power to you driving your truck to the beach and being fulfilled by the sport alone


One of my neighbors has a 100k boat and much more expensive camp - goes 3.7 hours each way every weekend to bass fishing- never keeps a fish
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:11 am to
Yea, but you can't just stroke a pen and fix that. Pogey boats is easy and impactful. Low hanging fruit. No brainer.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram