- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sig Sauer releases video of the engineering behind the P320...
Posted on 8/23/25 at 5:07 pm to jangalang
Posted on 8/23/25 at 5:07 pm to jangalang
quote:
The trigger never came close to hitting the wall. The video clearly showed there was plenty of room before the trigger hit the wall.
Obviously we aren't talking about the same video or clearly you didn't read my post. As I stated..."But is it the one that goes off because of the drywall screw added to the point where ti trigger hit the wall??"
Here, I'll help you.
LINK
Posted on 8/23/25 at 6:32 pm to SouthernInsanity
6:20 mark of the other video clearly shows plenty of play before the wall was reached.
Another thing does this happen to a glock? Same video doesnt think so.
Another thing does this happen to a glock? Same video doesnt think so.
Posted on 8/23/25 at 7:03 pm to jangalang
As someone pointed out a few weeks ago, I think the big difference with other striker fired guns is the striker block plunger being part of the slide assembly, and with the 320 its part of the trigger group thingy.
Posted on 8/23/25 at 7:41 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
That could be where the issue for 320 begins. I am a Sig fan and have a legion 226 and a P365. Not dogging the company but when a certain model has had smoke surrounding its safety for so long I am not going to carry it. Just seems reckless to do so.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:11 am to baldona
quote:
Why aren’t a bunch of special forces guys that have 10s of thousands of rounds through them in combat coming out crapping on them
Because US Army Special Forces uses Glock 19s....
Posted on 8/24/25 at 2:25 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Personally, I think
I enjoy your input on engines.
Not so much on firearms.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 2:51 pm to baldona
quote:
Why aren’t a bunch of special forces guys that have 10s of thousands of rounds through them in combat coming out crapping on them?
You obviously know nothing about combat.
If “special forces guys” are shooting “10s of thousands of rounds in combat”, from their SECONDARY firearms, then prove this to me and I will mail you a check for $1000.
There has been very, very, very few…need I say minuscule amounts of handgun usage in combat by American forces in the GWOT.
And then you crap on law enforcement who carries handguns as PRIMARY weapons EVERYDAY.
So many internet tough guys with no experience about which they opine - including you.
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 8/24/25 at 4:20 pm to TheDeerHunter
In this particular case they are very similar discussions, and pistols are far simpler than engines.
Im of the opinion that most firearms can be made to fire "unintentionally" with the right combination of oddball inputs. In this case, with the 320 being a hot topic, a youtuber has all the incentive in the world to find and display that combination of stuff, which in this case seems to be holding the trigger back some amount and pulling up on the slide to disengage the sear.
Im not crazy about the design, and I wouldn't carry one, but not because youtubers are getting them to go off. I dont like striker fired guns that dont have external safeties. If I had to carry one, it'd be a glock, because the service record is undeniable and the trigger pull is not exceptionally light or short, and doesn't lend itself to being pulled accidentally. Its the closest one to a double action trigger, requiring a lot of travel and partially cocking the striker as well.
In this case, I think a lot of the negative press is ill founded. Look at the circumstances here. An airmen shoots someone and lies about it, and the internet is abound with videos of how the pistol could go off inside of a holster, yet that isn't what happened.
Im curious how sig will handle it. Perceived issues are very nearly as big a problem as real ones, and they'll have to do something more than release a video showing the pistol is safe.
Im of the opinion that most firearms can be made to fire "unintentionally" with the right combination of oddball inputs. In this case, with the 320 being a hot topic, a youtuber has all the incentive in the world to find and display that combination of stuff, which in this case seems to be holding the trigger back some amount and pulling up on the slide to disengage the sear.
Im not crazy about the design, and I wouldn't carry one, but not because youtubers are getting them to go off. I dont like striker fired guns that dont have external safeties. If I had to carry one, it'd be a glock, because the service record is undeniable and the trigger pull is not exceptionally light or short, and doesn't lend itself to being pulled accidentally. Its the closest one to a double action trigger, requiring a lot of travel and partially cocking the striker as well.
In this case, I think a lot of the negative press is ill founded. Look at the circumstances here. An airmen shoots someone and lies about it, and the internet is abound with videos of how the pistol could go off inside of a holster, yet that isn't what happened.
Im curious how sig will handle it. Perceived issues are very nearly as big a problem as real ones, and they'll have to do something more than release a video showing the pistol is safe.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 4:22 pm to TheDeerHunter
quote:
If “special forces guys” are shooting “10s of thousands of rounds in combat”, from their SECONDARY firearms, then prove this to me and I will mail you a check for $1000.
Competitive shooters have put 10’s of thousands of rounds through P320’s. Why haven’t we heard about a P320 discharging at a match.
I’ve personally put a couple thousand through my P320’s and haven’t had an issue.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 7:16 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
In this case, I think a lot of the negative press is ill founded. Look at the circumstances here. An airmen shoots someone and lies about it, and the internet is abound with videos of how the pistol could go off inside of a holster, yet that isn't what happened.
Your timeline of events is so far off it explains your doubts.
This didn't start with airmen, they just used the existing issues to cover their stupidity. There are video of holstered weapons discharging if you care to look...and they are way older than the airmen story.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 8:58 pm to finchmeister08
I have a 320. I put a gray guns trigger kit in it. I have put 1000 rds through it. Never an issue but I also know how to draw a gun from a holster. Most of the “accidental” discharges have been operator error. People always looking to blame someone or something else for their frickups. There are over 3 million P320’s in use all over the world. Google says there are 100 reported cases of accidental discharge. Those are people saying it not that it actually happens.
My dad bought a Colt GC in 1984. It was full auto out of the box. Colt had installed the sear incorrectly where it wasn’t fully engaging the disconnect. He sent it back to Colt to fix. I wanted to buy 30 rd 1911 mags instead.
My dad bought a Colt GC in 1984. It was full auto out of the box. Colt had installed the sear incorrectly where it wasn’t fully engaging the disconnect. He sent it back to Colt to fix. I wanted to buy 30 rd 1911 mags instead.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:42 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
When this first started, I was thinking the same as well.
Then it started happening in holsters and people had proof.
Then it started happening in holsters and people had proof.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:48 am to lsufan1971
quote:
Most of the “accidental” discharges have been operator error.
You can google Glock accidental discharge and there are numerous cases against glock.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 11:59 am to kengel2
I personally didn't see a flood of 320 AD videos till after the airman story, but I dont really keep up with this stuff either other than what I see on here.
The montage of holster discharges I saw were all re-holstering if I remember right. Those aren't difficult to find for any pistol model anymore. They are glock-legging themselves with a P320 instead of a glock.
It's extremely difficult for me to take a video of a pistol with a nail shoved in the trigger seriously as proof that it has a design flaw.
The montage of holster discharges I saw were all re-holstering if I remember right. Those aren't difficult to find for any pistol model anymore. They are glock-legging themselves with a P320 instead of a glock.
It's extremely difficult for me to take a video of a pistol with a nail shoved in the trigger seriously as proof that it has a design flaw.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 5:59 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
It's extremely difficult for me to take a video of a pistol with a nail shoved in the trigger seriously as proof that it has a design flaw.
I took a P320 made sure the chamber was clear then pulled the trigger to the wall. I pushed the slide down, side to side, and also shook the pistol. The firing pin did not fall.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 8:23 pm to civiltiger07
i need one of these...


Posted on 8/25/25 at 8:48 pm to civiltiger07
Sig P320 Discharges During Match
Here ya go. Sir, thats a safari land holster. There is nothing in the way, such as a shirt or undergarment to get caught in the trigger, and his finger is also not touching the trigger.
Oh, that one isnt clear enough? Another One! So there ya go.
Here ya go. Sir, thats a safari land holster. There is nothing in the way, such as a shirt or undergarment to get caught in the trigger, and his finger is also not touching the trigger.
Oh, that one isnt clear enough? Another One! So there ya go.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 11:30 pm to BadatBourre
That first video looked to be a blackhawk serpa, a certifiable piece of junk holster.
I dont think safariland makes anything with a trigger finger unlock latch.
I'm sure you can just as easily find examples of the ol fashioned glock leg reholster.
I dont think safariland makes anything with a trigger finger unlock latch.
I'm sure you can just as easily find examples of the ol fashioned glock leg reholster.
Popular
Back to top


1






