- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SIAP - Duck Commander's in trouble with the gays.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:49 pm
14
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:54 pm to TigerTreyjpg
Yes and I agree with what he said 100%.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:54 pm to TigerTreyjpg
9 pages worth on the OT.
Phil
FWIW, I read the GQ article that your link originated from.... At first I figured it was a typical liberal writer with an agenda. I'm curious if Phil was provoked or unprovoked.
Phil
FWIW, I read the GQ article that your link originated from.... At first I figured it was a typical liberal writer with an agenda. I'm curious if Phil was provoked or unprovoked.
This post was edited on 12/18/13 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:56 pm to TigerTreyjpg
quote:
"It seems to me, a vagina -- as a man -- would be more desirable than a man's anus," he said
I'm no gay and appreciate his values and all but this made me laugh
quote:
Robertson also said he doesn't condemn people
This post was edited on 12/18/13 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:58 pm to Bama and Beer
Thought I would just go ahead and carry this over here. my comments in the OT thread.
So wait, the people who most often get up on a pedestal to preach about tolerance, acceptance, free speech, and freedom of action have a problem with another person stating their own personal beliefs. Shocking! Shocking, I tell you!
Maybe it is because he stated his opinion that certain actions are sinful based on his interpretation the bible. Of course, others openly state their opinion that it is not a sin based on their interpretation of disregard for the bible. So certainly it cant be that considering, the universal desire for free speech.
Maybe because he placed this opinion into the public realm somehow forcing others to be exposed to his form of thinking or beliefs, albeit easy to simply not read the article or watch the show. But, I am sure that is not the reason. I mean, certain communities strongly hold to the right to publicly display their beliefs and behavior with parades, staged week long events at children's parks, and increasing prevalence in TV shows and movies, regardless of how avoidable experiencing these are for the general public. Clearly then the semi public nature of these comments are not where the outrage is coming from.
Maybe, just maybe, those with such strong beliefs of tolerance, acceptance, and freedom of speech are a bit confused on just what those things truly are.
So wait, the people who most often get up on a pedestal to preach about tolerance, acceptance, free speech, and freedom of action have a problem with another person stating their own personal beliefs. Shocking! Shocking, I tell you!
Maybe it is because he stated his opinion that certain actions are sinful based on his interpretation the bible. Of course, others openly state their opinion that it is not a sin based on their interpretation of disregard for the bible. So certainly it cant be that considering, the universal desire for free speech.
Maybe because he placed this opinion into the public realm somehow forcing others to be exposed to his form of thinking or beliefs, albeit easy to simply not read the article or watch the show. But, I am sure that is not the reason. I mean, certain communities strongly hold to the right to publicly display their beliefs and behavior with parades, staged week long events at children's parks, and increasing prevalence in TV shows and movies, regardless of how avoidable experiencing these are for the general public. Clearly then the semi public nature of these comments are not where the outrage is coming from.
Maybe, just maybe, those with such strong beliefs of tolerance, acceptance, and freedom of speech are a bit confused on just what those things truly are.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:00 pm to TigerTreyjpg
Poor ol Phil, exercising his freedom of speech....
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:01 pm to Judge Smails
The OT loves them some gays.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:01 pm to TigerTreyjpg
Not surprising he doesn't feel happy happy happy about fudge packing 
I respect old Phil for telling his views like they are no matter who is listening. It doesn't mean he hates gay people. He just doesn't agree with what they do. I can respect that.
I respect old Phil for telling his views like they are no matter who is listening. It doesn't mean he hates gay people. He just doesn't agree with what they do. I can respect that.Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:02 pm to Bleeding purple
Im not sure why it is a difficult concept.
Is using the Lord's name in vain a sin?
Is adultery a sin?
Is murder a sin?
Are the people who commit these sins sinners?
Are you condemning them for applying that logic?
It is not our duty to judge or apply justice as Christians. That is God's job.
Is using the Lord's name in vain a sin?
Is adultery a sin?
Is murder a sin?
Are the people who commit these sins sinners?
Are you condemning them for applying that logic?
It is not our duty to judge or apply justice as Christians. That is God's job.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:04 pm to TigerTreyjpg
Yeah, see it over there. Admin, I'm RA'ing myself in case you want to delete this thread since it's on the OT.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:06 pm to TigerTreyjpg
The thing is that Phil Robertson is losing no sleep over this which makes it even more funny.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:09 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
The OT loves them some gays.
Have you been lurking that thread?
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:09 pm to TigerTreyjpg
quote:
Yeah, see it over there.
Nah man, don't take it that way. We need our own discussion over here.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:10 pm to LSUnowhas2
with fame comes scrutiny
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:11 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
It is not our duty to judge or apply justice as Christians. That is God's job.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:12 pm to Bama and Beer
quote:
with fame comes scrutiny
I am agreeing with you with alarming regularity - scary thought
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:12 pm to Judge Smails
quote:My comment was based on past readings. I just read a bit when it was posted here.
Have you been lurking that thread?
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:14 pm to LSUnowhas2
Yep, no fricks given in the Robertson triple wide. He is busy killing dux right now and not going on Barbara Walters interviews.
I hope the gheys don't want an apology because there is no way in hades that man is giving one.
I hope the gheys don't want an apology because there is no way in hades that man is giving one.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:14 pm to jobbieman
quote:
Yes and I agree with what he said 100%.
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News