Started By
Message

re: I'm seeing that the Trout limits were passed today.(updated with link)

Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:20 pm to
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28851 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

please explain how standardized independent fisheries surveys are supposed to work


Should we be concerned about the Marsh bass population if we set up a net for them in the Gulf of Mexico?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
171869 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:46 pm to
Here's a better idea... get the pogie boats off the shore
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2744 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Here's a better idea... get the pogie boats off the shore


Why not both?
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Why not both?

Because we don't have a trout issue
We have a pogy boat issue
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2744 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Because we don't have a trout issue We have a pogy boat issue


You certain of both of those things?
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

You certain of both of those things?

Yes.
We've had no trouble catching trout in Timbilair
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2744 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Yes. We've had no trouble catching trout in Timbilair


So just based off of your personal experience? Hopefully LDWF is considering more than that. I’m all for some type of restrictions and I just had my best year in hopedale in the last 5 years.
Posted by nated14
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
919 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 6:50 pm to
All of it is anecdotal but it’s crazy to limit hook and line fisherman while allowing the pogey boats to rape and pillage. Mississippi is going back to 14” after their study. I’m all in on Louisiana being 12 and 15. 13.5 and 15 doesn’t make much sense to me. Pogie boats need restrictions as well though
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2744 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 7:11 pm to
The idea behind 13.5 is you significantly increase the spawning biomass because most trout are smaller. That and you give all trout the chance to spawn 1x and many of them the chance to spawn twice. I’m not saying that’s going to significantly revitalize our fishery but that’s the thinking behind the new rules.
If MS is going back to 14” it’s because increasing the size limit worked. That’s hopeful
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28851 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

If MS is going back to 14” it’s because increasing the size limit worked. That’s hopeful


Hopeful for what? There is no evidence of a problem.
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
14065 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 8:06 pm to
quote:


Hopeful for what? There is no evidence of a problem.


pretty sure the assessment showed there is a problem with seatrout in LA
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

I’m all for some type of restrictions

Why?
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Pogie boats need restrictions as well though

Follow the AIS to see if they're following the however many miles out rule
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2744 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

I’m all for some type of restrictions Why?


The idea behind 13.5 is you significantly increase the spawning biomass because most trout are smaller. That and you give all trout the chance to spawn 1x and many of them the chance to spawn twice.

There is no rational way to argue that this won’t have a net positive (more fish, more fish contributing to the spawn) for the fishery. You can say that you don’t like more governmental rules and I would agree with you there, but you can’t say this is going to hurt the fishery. Whine all you want but it doesn’t make it true.
Posted by Scrowe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2010
2936 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

We've had no trouble catching trout in Timbilair


I've fished Timbalier for 3 decades and the fishery is nothing like it was 10 years ago it has been in decline numbers wise and size wise.

I can't say what for sure is changing it, but a catch decrease and size increase will help all fisheries. Now if they can just do something about the pogie boats leaving trails of death in their wake, we should get some positive results.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28851 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

There is no rational way to argue that this won’t have a net positive (more fish, more fish contributing to the spawn) for the fishery.


Except that fact that the fishery can only support a finite amount of fish. What happens when you have a larger population competing for a shrinking amount of forage?
Most of y’all know about 1/2 of what you think you do.
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 10:24 pm
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28851 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

I've fished Timbalier for 3 decades and the fishery is nothing like it was 10 years ago it has been in decline numbers wise and size wise.


You evidently didn’t fish this summer or have no idea on where to go.
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

I've fished Timbalier for 3 decades and the fishery is nothing like it was 10 years ago it has been in decline numbers wise and size wise.


I live here. You don't know where or how to fish.
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

The idea behind 13.5 is you significantly increase the spawning biomass because most trout are smaller. That and you give all trout the chance to spawn 1x and many of them the chance to spawn twice.

There is no rational way to argue that this won’t have a net positive (more fish, more fish contributing to the spawn) for the fishery. You can say that you don’t like more governmental rules and I would agree with you there, but you can’t say this is going to hurt the fishery. Whine all you want but it doesn’t make it true.


Go see big lake and how much it didn't help them. Ask the guides.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
46001 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 12:17 am to
Mississippi science has always supported the 14 inch size limit. the bullshite now was a result of a change to 13 inches to appease a freaking state Senator whose grandkids could only catch 13 inch trout off his freaking pier.

At 14 inches you pretty much have 100% spr. You are really close at 13.5 too. I honestly think you will find over time you will get as much meat off 15 trout that are going to average 1.5 as u will 25 that average a pound
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram