- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How much stronger is the recoil of a 44 Magnum vs that of a 357 Magnum?
Posted on 12/28/19 at 10:30 am
Posted on 12/28/19 at 10:30 am
In a revolver, un-ported barrel, etc.
Is the recoil way different or is there a manageable difference for someone used to shooting a 357?
I know there are other factors such as bullet weights, revolver weights, grips, loads, etc, but I've never shot a 44 Magnum and just trying to get an idea of how much in difference the recoil will generally be.
Is the recoil way different or is there a manageable difference for someone used to shooting a 357?
I know there are other factors such as bullet weights, revolver weights, grips, loads, etc, but I've never shot a 44 Magnum and just trying to get an idea of how much in difference the recoil will generally be.
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 10:34 am
Posted on 12/28/19 at 10:48 am to cypressbrake3
.44 magnum generates significantly more recoil than .357 magnum. I dont know how to quantify it. A full size 357 is easy to control even with the hottest ammo. A .44 magnum with hot loads is painful without good technique. I've never shot one that was uncontrollable, but it will absolutely let you know if you're doing something wrong.
It's nothing to be scared of, typical 44 mags are plenty heavy enough to soak up the recoil and I've never shot an inaccurate one. It just takes some getting used to if you're not familiar with shooting heavy recoil revolvers.
Also, you can practice with .44 special which is a pussycat out of full size magnum revolvers.
It's nothing to be scared of, typical 44 mags are plenty heavy enough to soak up the recoil and I've never shot an inaccurate one. It just takes some getting used to if you're not familiar with shooting heavy recoil revolvers.
Also, you can practice with .44 special which is a pussycat out of full size magnum revolvers.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 11:27 am to cypressbrake3
I think a Ruger Super Redhawk has more felt recoil than a S&W 629.
So, not only does caliber matter, but brand of pistol as well.
So, not only does caliber matter, but brand of pistol as well.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 12:08 pm to cypressbrake3
Put really hot .357 loads in an aluminium snubby.
That's pretty close
Honestly, I've never thought .44 was that bad. It's a vertical rather than torque recoil.
That's pretty close

Honestly, I've never thought .44 was that bad. It's a vertical rather than torque recoil.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 12:22 pm to cypressbrake3
I have both a 44 and 357 both snubnoses.
I’ve shot some heavy long-barreled 44’s before that seemed to have little recoil, but that snubnose is something else.
I’ve shot some heavy long-barreled 44’s before that seemed to have little recoil, but that snubnose is something else.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 12:34 pm to cypressbrake3
quote:
Is the recoil way different or is there a manageable difference for someone used to shooting a 357?
Not so much "way different," mainly just "more of it" (assuming you're shooting similar guns, i.e. 6" 357 Mag steel revolver compared to 6" 44 Mag steel revolver). Having said that, different grip configurations can generate different types of recoil. Folks who like single actions (Super Blackhawk) say the recoil is not as heavy backwards, but more of a twisting upward motion compared to revolvers (Redhawk). I've shot plenty revolvers, but not single actions so I don't have personal experience. When I started shooting handguns, I went from 22LR's to a 44 Mag Ruger Redhawk w/ a 7 1/2" barrel. I hand loaded 44 Special loads and shot a lot of them in the beginning, NOT full power loads. I put Pachmayr "Presentation" rubber grips on it and that helped w/ felt recoil as it spread out the recoil over a larger surface compared to the wooden, more narrow grips. I later got a Redhawk w/ a 5 1/2" barrel and narrow Pachmayr ("Decelertor") grips. W/ the lighter barrel weight and more narrow grips, some loads became uncomfortable on the hand w/ the shorter Redhawk despite being ok w/ the longer barrel. Regardless, the recoil is managable, especially w/ the proper set up (consider a good pair of padded shooting gloves when you start shooting full power loads), good technique and load selection (do NOT start w/ full power loads). Learn your gun w/ reduced loads. Consider hand loading for the reduced loads. I don't shoot revolvers much nowadays but I hunt entirely w/ bolt action handguns that include the 308 Win, 7-08 Rem and 284 Win. Learning how to handle recoil is doable. Keep us updated.

Posted on 12/28/19 at 12:37 pm to cypressbrake3
All depends on the weight of the pistol. The lighter it is the worse the recoil.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 12:51 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
Thanks for the information, guys.
I'm familiar with the Pachmayr Presentation grips, have them on both my 357s and like 'em.
I'm familiar with the Pachmayr Presentation grips, have them on both my 357s and like 'em.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 1:22 pm to cypressbrake3
I tried my cousins 44 Ruger Blackhawk. 7” barrel?
I hated it. I loaded a full cylinder and emptied it half way, then handed it back to him. Call me a wuss I don’t care, I don’t want to develop a flinch. Great hunting round for y’all that can handle it, though.
I hated it. I loaded a full cylinder and emptied it half way, then handed it back to him. Call me a wuss I don’t care, I don’t want to develop a flinch. Great hunting round for y’all that can handle it, though.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 2:06 pm to cypressbrake3
Depends on the weight of the gun and the particular load.
A large, heavy .44 magnum revolver with a standard loading might have less recoil than one of the small polymer .357s.
But, let's get as close to apples-to-apples as we can - N-frame .357 (like a 27 or 627) vs an N-frame .44 (29 or 629), 4" to 6" - with a standard, factory loading for each, say Federal 125 grain vs. Federal 240 grain, subjectively, for me (I do not consider myself recoil sensitive), that is between a 15 and 20 percent increase. I think it is manageable.
Does that help?
A large, heavy .44 magnum revolver with a standard loading might have less recoil than one of the small polymer .357s.
But, let's get as close to apples-to-apples as we can - N-frame .357 (like a 27 or 627) vs an N-frame .44 (29 or 629), 4" to 6" - with a standard, factory loading for each, say Federal 125 grain vs. Federal 240 grain, subjectively, for me (I do not consider myself recoil sensitive), that is between a 15 and 20 percent increase. I think it is manageable.
Does that help?
Posted on 12/28/19 at 2:12 pm to cypressbrake3
According to this research, about double the recoil using full magnums in each caliber:
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 12/28/19 at 3:21 pm to cypressbrake3
Significant. .44mag is a damn beast.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 3:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Could you imagine shooting one from the bottom of that list with 40+ ft/lbs of recoil?
Posted on 12/28/19 at 6:00 pm to Ace Midnight
I've never been bothered by recoil on a handgun until I bought a .454 Casull. That bastard was a wrist breaker, .44 mag is quite manageable and the .357 is even lighter.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:18 pm to Barneyrb
quote:
I've never been bothered by recoil on a handgun until I bought a .454 Casull.
And those are generally even bigger, heavier guns.
Frankly, I don't see the point of it other than nostalgia. For the weight of the weapon you're carrying, might as well carry a rifle or carbine, IMHO.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 11:44 pm to cypressbrake3

This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 11:45 pm
Popular
Back to top
