Started By
Message

re: Bill filed for starting a Louisiana bear season next year.

Posted on 3/6/22 at 7:59 am to
Posted by Riolobo
On the lake
Member since Mar 2017
4312 posts
Posted on 3/6/22 at 7:59 am to
This bill is not passing even though I wish it would. These politicians are just trying to satisfy many in their districts.
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/6/22 at 8:22 am to
Yep. I'm sure that was the intent of the author. And to let the DWF know, "we waiting, ....."
This post was edited on 3/6/22 at 10:05 am
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
3708 posts
Posted on 3/6/22 at 8:08 pm to
I don’t think we have resident cougars.Just an occasional one passing through,usually a young male looking to establish a territory.

Black panthers are another story.It’s amazing how many people claim to have seen one.??
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 12:48 am to
Yeah i don't believe or not believe. I don't doubt anything walking around out there.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6448 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Louisiana is one of the only states in the south that has 5 ungulate predators: hogs, bobcat, black bear, cougar, coyote.

quote:

We have cougars in LA?


They're everywhere in Lafayette

Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 11:19 am to
Did yall see that boo hoo article that La Sportsman ran on this ?

The same whiney spoiled attitude i witnessed with the gill net ban in the 1990's
Posted by mrcoon
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2019
536 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 1:44 pm to
This one? Louisiana Sportsman Black Bear

What is so "boo hoo" about it?
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 3:25 pm to
Well, i thought about how to answer you without exactly telling you how it is, which would cause many to break keyboards on their pc.

You ever watch westerns, say , Gunsmoke or a JW movie, where the whole town is lynch mobbed trying to get at a prisoner, who is safe in jail. The mob wants to hang him now, but the Marshall has a clear thinking head and does things the right way.

Thats what i see here. In time, when they see fit , the DWF will adjust.

Right now, the ONLY thing that article mentioned that has validity for concern, is the farmer's crop damage. That is a pressing issue. None of the other reasons have any validity.
This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 3:27 pm
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6795 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 4:49 pm to
The entire reason the Black Bear Recovery Plan was enacted was to get the black bear population high enough to be able to hunt them. We're there now in selected parishes.
Louisiana Black Bear Management Plan - LDWF, 2015
quote:


Harvest

If, in the future, federal protection is no longer warranted for the Louisiana black bear, bear harvests based on demographic monitoring data may be established with the approval of the LWFC. If harvests are implemented, they would be altered annually to reflect the previous year's subpopulation dynamics.

This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 5:22 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64186 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Right now, the ONLY thing that article mentioned that has validity for concern, is the farmer's crop damage.





quote:

“I have just heard from so many farmers, hunters, landowners and other citizens who have had countless issues with personal property damage and crop damage caused by the growing number of bears,” Sen. Cathey said. “The bears have become a real nuisance and have turned into a safety issue on both sides. It’s getting so a lot of fathers and grandfathers don’t feel safe taking their children and grandchildren in the woods because of encounters with bears. We already face enough challenges passing the legacy of hunting and enjoying the outdoors to our youth. Bears have no natural predators in Louisiana and they have little fear of human contact. They are growing in size and numbers. It’s not a healthy situation.


Do I need to spell this out for you (again) or do you get it now?
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 5:04 pm to
No, the only valid factor is farmer crop damage. Perhaps if you separate your points into catagories, and we discuss each separately, you may see the light.

Remember, thats the same outfit that raced to put Chris Courville on front page news, only to get egg in face later, when he was caught.
This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 5:11 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64186 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

No, the only valid factor is farmer crop damage


Why are the other factors invalid?
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 5:33 pm to
The black bear existed by nature . We just missed having them for a long while, because people like Ben Lilly killed too many, and the soybean boom of the 1970's caused alot of land clearing. Now they are back.

The property damage, i.e. corn feeders, they don't belong anyway, in the natural order of things. So many folk do not know or have forgot conservation.

The other property damage such as crop damage, yes we agreed on that already. The DWF should adjust soon to address that.

People " afraid " , you have to get woods wise.


This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 6:00 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64186 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 6:31 pm to
Having a bear season with tags is not inconsistent with conservation.

quote:

The property damage, i.e. corn feeders, they don't belong anyway, in the natural order of things


I bet you think it was ok for native Americans to build fish weirs outside the natural order of things.


quote:

People " afraid " , you have to get woods wise.


Bears that don't get hunted don't get afraid of humans. Hunting them weeds out the brave ones, and the smart reclusive ones carry on their genes. It's 6th grade biology.

Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30122 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Bill filed for starting a Louisiana bear season next year.


well thats nice and all, but when are we gonna get a roux-ga-roux season?
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 6:54 pm to
Yes that is a secondary good point once DWF determines that numbers warrant a few tags. But it does not in and of itself give reason to open a season. Only correct numbers and reasoning by biologists with Master degrees, determine that.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64186 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Yes that is a secondary good point once DWF determines that numbers warrant a few tags. But it does not in and of itself give reason to open a season. Only correct numbers and reasoning by biologists with Master degrees, determine that.


So if tomorrow a state biologist determines there are plenty enough bears to open a season, will you write them a strongly worded letter encouraging them to take into consideration the extent to which people are, or are not, woods wise enough? Or will you simply accept their assessment because they have a masters degree?


What your logic seems to be is this: There shouldn't be a bear season because the government experts haven't deemed it necessary, but if they deem it OK tomorrow, then it's fine, because the government said so. There shouldn't be a bear season right now because the government hasn't said so yet.
This post was edited on 3/7/22 at 7:15 pm
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30702 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 7:27 pm to
quote:


So if tomorrow a state biologist determines there are plenty enough bears to open a season, will you write them a strongly worded letter encouraging them to take into consideration the extent to which people are, or are not, woods wise enough? Or will you simply accept their assessment because they have a masters degree?


actually they have to prove they warrant delisting from endangers species act.... and prove the 3 populations are intermingling.... or all of this is for naught..


the existing habitat being beyond carrying capacity is one of the two thresholds they have crossed along with total population.
Posted by EF Hutton
Member since Jan 2018
2366 posts
Posted on 3/7/22 at 8:35 pm to
Exactly. It takes the emotion, trend followers, popular bandwagon, all out of the over react equation.

Professional scientific decision making, not effected by bias.
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6795 posts
Posted on 3/8/22 at 8:25 am to
quote:

actually they have to prove they warrant delisting from endangers species act.... and prove the 3 populations are intermingling.... or all of this is for naught..


the existing habitat being beyond carrying capacity is one of the two thresholds they have crossed along with total population.


The Louisiana Black Bear was removed from the Endangered Species List in 2016

USFWS Link
quote:

TALLULAH, La. – U.S. Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell today announced that due to 24 years of dedicated recovery efforts by a broad array of partners, the Louisiana black bear—the inspiration for the teddy bear—will be removed from the Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. The species restoration is a significant conservation success and further demonstrates the value of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram