Started By
Message

Bad Moon Rising

Posted on 9/6/19 at 9:14 pm
Posted by KemoSabe65
70605
Member since Mar 2018
5145 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 9:14 pm
LINK /

I have met with fisheries biologists and always have know they were holding back their true thoughts due to politics. It’s hard to trust the biologists when they won’t tell you what they believe is the right move. My guess is a 14” min and 10 fish from mermentau to Sabine & 14” & 15 from mermentau east.
Me and TopwaterTiger were at the meeting in 2012 when the last numbers were presented and they were trending down at that time. Politics played a roll in doing nothing but politics can’t stop it now.
This post was edited on 9/6/19 at 10:16 pm
Posted by WPsportsman
In a van down by the river
Member since Jun 2015
2408 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 9:31 pm to
I’m for 20 trout total of which 5 can be over 20 inches. I have no scientific reasons just sounds good to me.
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
58640 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

I’m for 20 trout total of which 5 can be over 20 inches. I have no scientific reasons just sounds good to me.
i have a feeling Its going to be way more severe than that... unfortunately.

I think we’ll be lucky to have a 15 limit.


This post was edited on 9/6/19 at 9:38 pm
Posted by SaDaTayMoses
Member since Oct 2005
4320 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 9:38 pm to
Heading out of Venice in 1 week from today. IDGAF what conditions are. “We comin”

Dem yella fins, baw
This post was edited on 9/6/19 at 9:39 pm
Posted by CP3
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
7406 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Venice


quote:

Dem yella fins, baw


good luck
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 10:09 pm to
Meh.

Make it 12 over 15" dont make a shite to me.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10145 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 5:05 am to
Close oyster harvesting for 3-5 years and watch the trout numbers explode.

Yep, new rules are coming I'm afraid and they are not going to be received well.
Posted by Nicky Parrish
Member since Apr 2016
7098 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 5:48 am to
Size should be when fried, it would fit perfectly on a slice of fresh Evangeline made bread.
I have no scientific reasons just sounds good to me.
Posted by Manchac Man
Member since Dec 2014
1508 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 6:58 am to
25 fish per person has always seemed like too many to clean anyway. Cutting the limit back is fine, but they are gonna need to improve the resource in other conservation methods aside from just reducing catch numbers.
Posted by Wolfmanjack
Member since Jun 2017
1021 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 9:49 am to
Prepare thy ani boyz, we about to get fricked with no dinner, or movie, or even lube. I have a sneaking suspicion it’s gonna be 5 fish. Next year or the year after when we don’t have a hard winter and the river is low and people are catching trout two at a time: no way will they ever raise the limit again. The biologist(some of who can barely drive a boat) will be out there dropping their nets in the same exact spot as in 1975. For the record, we are still catching limits or near limits in the Terrebonne estuary.
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
58640 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 10:56 am to
quote:

no way will they ever raise the limit again.
Thats correck. 25 will be a thing of the past never to be seent again.

5 would be a complete joke though.



Guess I’ll sale da yeti and rtic... My new sweet boat cooler will do just fine

This post was edited on 9/7/19 at 11:09 am
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25985 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 11:26 pm to
The LDWF report outlined several management options either taken individually or in a combination, to include:

reduced creel limits;
Increase from the current 12-inch minimum size limit and/or a slot-size limit;
closed areas and/or closed seasons;
and, special regulations after severe winters.

Both factors reached high levels in 2007-2008, but have declined sharkly since. The LDWF report showed a decline in spawning stock biomass (SSB) from a high near 9 million pounds to this year’s near 4 million pounds, and a spawning potential ratio (SPR) decline from 20 percent in 2008 to near 9 percent in the current study.

With some certainty, the harsh winters of 2014 and 2018 are factors in the population downturn, and there’s a lingering belief in the scientific community — although not by all — and among recreational fishermen that the 2010 BP-Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster continues to affect marine organisms along and off Louisiana’s coast.

My prediction is 10 with 15 inch min with large areas being closed for trout fishing during certain times. Imagine Breton Sound being shut down from May to Aug
This post was edited on 9/7/19 at 11:29 pm
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19600 posts
Posted on 9/7/19 at 11:42 pm to
Would make my decision about buying a big boat a whole lot easier. 10 fish limit would make it almost not worth going for me anyway.
This post was edited on 9/8/19 at 8:46 am
Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
4936 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 7:49 am to
I think it is interesting that they blame over fishing for the situation. Let's talk about the oil spill. Let's talk about the Mardi Gras pass situation. I can see cutting the limit to let's say 15, but increasing the maximum length will hurt the average marsh fisherman. We could also limit the number kept over 20 inches. Why doesn't the state open a hatchery and work to improve the environment?
Posted by KemoSabe65
70605
Member since Mar 2018
5145 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 8:44 am to
There were talks of a hatchery for Lake Charles, land has been donated but I think BP put that on a back burner. Thanks for bringing it up, I’ll make a call this week and try to find out what’s going on and update later.
I’m good with a slot 14”-20” but not sure it’s not a feels instead of help. Watched 10 4+# females get butchered a month ago, all with eggs. Louisiana mindset is I caught it so I should kill it, will never change I’m afraid.
This post was edited on 9/8/19 at 8:48 am
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25985 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:43 am to
BP oil spill really has started crashing the environment but so to has the severe over production of Louisiana oysters. Oyster reefs have been decimated over the years and the public is largely unaware of their disappearance over the last ten years.

BTW it’s not just the disappearance of trout that have people concerned it’s the loss of our Cochahoe and menhaden fishery as well. Flounders, croaker, white trout all have plunged too.
This post was edited on 9/8/19 at 10:46 am
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19600 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 11:07 am to
Do have any proof that the BP spill is still having environmental effects?

Oil is not near as hazardous to the environment as it is made out to be especially down here in a subtropical environment. The breakdown rate is fairly rapid.


Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25985 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 11:33 am to
The LaDWF’s scientists are citing it as a problem so I’ll defer to them
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19600 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 11:36 am to
Meh, more of an excuse for shitty resource and habitat management but I digress.

Much of it was/is out of their control.
Posted by PinevilleTiger
Pineville, LA
Member since Sep 2005
6207 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 12:41 pm to
It’s all about $$ so they’ll cater to the fish hogs. Same with deer. 6 deer a year is outrageous but they’re scared they will lose license revenue so they chose to decimate the resource rather than piss off a couple greedy slob/meat hunters.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram