- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Any reason not to get a AWD suv over standard FWD?
Posted on 8/30/25 at 4:55 am to BoogaBear
Posted on 8/30/25 at 4:55 am to BoogaBear
quote:
What does it do better than a 4wd capable vehicle?
Be transparent to the driver. Always engaged. Excellent traction control. It works well for cars and SUVs, and traditional 4wd does not. Traditional 4wd does my wife zero good in a monsoon on the highway, because you dont use it for that.
Im not sure what you're getting at here. Traditional 4wd does no good for anyone on the highway outside of the mountains and using it there is a great inconvenience.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 11:38 am to GREENHEAD22
AWD you have to replace all of the tires if you get a flat.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 11:56 am to Taxman2010
quote:
Taxman2010
You’re showing your stupid again.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 12:04 pm to BoogaBear
quote:
What does it do better than a 4wd capable vehicle?
If it doesn’t do anything great why do all rally cars use it??
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:59 pm to Taxman2010
quote:
AWD you have to replace all of the tires if you get a flat.
bruh...
Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:28 pm to BoogaBear
quote:
I've always thought of AWD as sort of a gimmick.
You clearly don’t live in an area where you see winter weather.
AWD is far from a gimmick.
OP. The traction you get from an AWD vs front wheel drive is night and day. Only real “down side” is tires don’t last as long, but that’s marginal.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 5:31 am to Megasaurus
Thats loosely accurate, at least with Subaru. I dont remember exactly what the manual says but it doesn't like having 3 worn tires and 1 new one on it.
It doesn't really matter. Just accept that you will be buying tires slightly more frequently. You should still get 40-50k miles from good ones.
It doesn't really matter. Just accept that you will be buying tires slightly more frequently. You should still get 40-50k miles from good ones.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:12 am to GREENHEAD22
I have kept my lady in AWD for decades. Her current ride an Infiniti and it’s can scoot! But handles great. I will always prefer AWD for the family car.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 5:15 pm to GREENHEAD22
I saw a study many years ago(maybe motortrend) that showed AWD had nearly 70% less accidents than FWD. We’ve only had awd for the last decade or better. True, the tire situation is less than desirable but I’m ok with that in exchange form overall safety and piece of mind.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 7:02 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Be transparent to the driver. Always engaged. Excellent traction control. It works well for cars and SUVs, and traditional 4wd does not. Traditional 4wd does my wife zero good in a monsoon on the highway, because you dont use it for that.
Eh I agree with boogie, what I would say in regards to needing the traction in a monsoon is that if you actually need that traction then you need to slow down.
Awd is essentially 4wd for dummies, I agree with boogie here. Yes it’s great in the 1% or less time you actually need it. Which for women, wives, and daughters likely makes it very valuable I agree.
If you told someone they should just drive in 4wd mode 100% of the time you’d be seen as a crazy idiot.
Awd really shines in ice and snow which we really don’t get in the south.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 7:20 am to lsufan1971
quote:
Honda has probably the best AWD system in the industry.
Subaru says hello.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 7:28 am to BoogaBear
quote:
What does it do better than a 4wd capable vehicle?
Two different use cases.
Having lived in snow country for over two decades, I can tell you the difference first-hand. There are many times where traction loss on the road is spotty and unpredictable. You might be driving at highway speeds on clear pavement, and then conditions instantly change—hitting a sudden snow squall, rounding a curve onto the shady side of a mountain where ice lingers, or encountering an isolated patch of packed snow.
In a traditional 4WD vehicle, you have to manually engage the transfer case to get power to all four wheels. But that requires both time and judgment, you need to notice the change, decide it’s worth switching, and then physically engage 4WD. Often the slippery patch is brief, and by the time you react, you’re already past it. There are many times in my F150 where I'm constantly debating with myself if and when to engage 4wd. With AWD, you don’t have to think about it, you’re already there. AWD systems constantly monitor traction and automatically route power where it’s needed, even if the change in conditions only lasts a few seconds. That’s when AWD really shines.
Another important factor is how 4WD systems are designed to be used. Most part-time 4WD vehicles should not be driven in 4WD mode on dry pavement. Doing so creates driveline binding and puts excessive strain on the transfer case and other components, which can lead to expensive damage. AWD systems, on the other hand, are specifically built to operate full-time on any surface, seamlessly transitioning between dry roads and slippery conditions without risk of mechanical harm.
So, while 4WD is great for deeper snow, mud, and off-road use where you need maximum traction for long stretches, AWD provides a critical advantage in real-world driving, where traction needs can change instantly and unpredictably.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 7:30 am
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:16 am to baldona
quote:
Eh I agree with boogie,
Don't agree with the guy who's wrong.
AWD is anything but a gimmick. Its incredible. Standing water on the road is a very frequent and real hazard in the south, and AWD excels in dealing with it.
Id venture to say that short of rock climbing, AWD is vastly more useful and better than old fashioned 4wd if cost of construction were not a concern. All old fashioned 4wd does better than a good awd system is be cheap
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:32 am to Lonnie Utah
All fair and valid points, but don't most modern 4WD vehicles come with auto 4WD? Engaging power to the front wheels when traction is lost?
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:43 am to BoogaBear
quote:
don't most modern 4WD vehicles come with auto 4WD? Engaging power to the front wheels when traction is lost?
Many, not most, modern 4WD systems have an auto mode—but here’s the key difference.
Auto 4WD is RWD-first, then 4WD. It usually waits until wheel slip is detected before sending power forward. AWD systems, on the other hand, are typically FWD-first, then AWD. That matters because on ice, RWD—especially while cornering—isn’t ideal; the rear end of the vehicle is more likely to “step out.”
Another big distinction is how the systems process their sensor data. Auto 4WD is generally reactive—it responds once slip happens. AWD systems are often predictive, proactively shifting torque based on inputs like wheel speed, steering angle, throttle, and yaw to prevent slip before it occurs. That preemptive vs. reactive difference can be an advantage on slick, unpredictable surfaces.
As I said, I've lived here for close to 25 years, and there's a reason I own both a subaru and a truck.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 8:44 am
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:44 am to BoogaBear
quote:
auto 4WD
It works differently than true AWD. Most AWD vehicles tend to bias torque to the front wheels in normal operation but it's always split to some degree. Auto 4wd systems are normal RWD trucks and will engage the front drive shaft if wheel spin is detected. All that takes time, and it's more useful for something like a lazy man driving across a pasture who doesn't want to bother with shifting into and out of 4wd than it is for dealing with spotty road traction at speed.
With an AWD system you don't even get a revolution of wheel spin before the torque is being sent elsewhere. Auto 4wd systems are nowhere near that reactive. Auto 4wd works exactly like you clicking the 4 hi button once you realize your back end is losing traction. It's a great system and super handy, but AWD it is not.
You'd have to drive one in poor conditions to really understand how good AWD is. Its vastly better than most traditional 4wd systems that are actually 3 wheel drive at best and more often 2 wheel opposite corner drive. AWD is true four wheel drive, nearly full torque to any individual tire available all the time.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:45 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
DownshiftAndFloorIt
Username checks out...
Posted on 9/2/25 at 8:51 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Another important factor is how 4WD systems are designed to be used. Most part-time 4WD vehicles should not be driven in 4WD mode on dry pavement. Doing so creates driveline binding and puts excessive strain on the transfer case and other components, which can lead to expensive damage. AWD systems, on the other hand, are specifically built to operate full-time on any surface, seamlessly transitioning between dry roads and slippery conditions without risk of mechanical harm.
There's a reason the front end parts of a 4wd truck are half the size of the rear end parts. The rear end has to be able to handle the full torque all the time. The front end is only meant to deal with half the torque at most, and very infrequently. Driving around with 4wd engaged all the time, even on slippery surfaces, is going to wear a lot of stuff out very quickly. It isn't designed for that.
Also, everyone ignores the fact that four wheel drive for most pickups is basically never actually fourwheel drive. It's usually 3 or 2 wheel drive, depending on what's going on. It takes a lot of complicated stuff to make a true four wheel drive vehicle that is also street usable. All wheel drive natively acts as true four wheel drive when it is needed. It's intelligent, and sends torque to tires that have traction. The front axle of most trucks does the opposite, as does the rear of many of them.
AND - the best thing about AWD - your wife has no idea it's even there or doing anything. No special knowledge or instructions necessary. Just drive it. Goes off the side of the driveway after a big rain? Doesn't matter. Sleet on the road? Doesn't matter. Generally physics-retarded and no concept of hydroplaning? Doesn't matter. Just drive it.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 9:21 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
AND - the best thing about AWD - your wife has no idea it's even there or doing anything. No special knowledge or instructions necessary. Just drive it.
spot on and the reason I've kept my wife in an AWD 4Runner for so many years in Colorado. She just gets in and drives (albeit more slowly, carefully dictated on exact conditions) whereas she will occasionally drive my truck and I have to remind her to engage / disengage 4WD depending on conditions and I'll hear from her later about how she forgot and lost traction.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 9:26 am to Don Quixote
The advantages for us in Louisiana are far less apparent than they are for you rocky mountain people. Snow and ice on inclines its obvious. Flat and usually dry is a less obvious use case for AWD. It's one of those things that doesn't really sound useful until you have it and find out that it is wonderful.
Popular
Back to top

1







