- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Age of this deer?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 4:52 pm to 257WBY
Posted on 12/8/24 at 4:52 pm to 257WBY
I like this response. Most pictures of this deer are at night. I’m looking at his shoulders and neck and they look thick. For reference the feeder openings are about 40” off the ground. Had to measure a few weeks ago.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 6:41 pm to 257WBY
quote:
. If you have ten or more pictures of a buck and know what an age class looks like in your area, then anyone can age on the hoof.
Yet you looked at 2 pictures and didn’t know what area the deer was and said he was a 3 yr old in your first post in this thread.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 8:27 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
anyone claiming to age deer between 2.5 and 6 are just guessing.
Perhaps, but the friend I guide for in Illinois has better than a 95% track record for the past decade.
Now, I’ll admit that he’s looking at photos of these deer year around.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:12 pm to 257WBY
quote:
Your inability to age deer on the hoof doesn’t mean others are unable to. I understand that your hunting situations don’t require you to age a deer, but there may come a time when you’d like to kill a certain age class of deer. If you have ten or more pictures of a buck and know what an age class looks like in your area, then anyone can age on the hoof. Sure, some will be wrong. But one can get in the ballpark.
Wrong and I'll prove it soon. Don't mean that to come off sounding condescending. I've got over 20 years of photos and lab data. I know of 4 deer right this minute that nobody would guess over 4.5 that are close to or past 10 years old. You can tell a deer if it's old or young but once mature its just people throwing out numbers. I killed one last year that was aged at 11 by cementum annuli testing. Barely enough root to even age and 2 of the teeth were to the gun. Molars were almost wore flat to the gum line. I had over 5 years of pics but nobody had guessed the deer over 5.5.
The most interesting thing to me with following deer into old age is how the racks change among individual deer after they peak out. Some barely decline, some greatly decline and 1 just kept getting better. They mostly decline though and the "mass" theory usually doesn't hold true.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:00 pm to Guess_who
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:03 am to Guess_who
“Once mature, people are throwing out numbers…”. If hunters and biologists can age a buck as mature, are we not doing a good job of aging?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 8:06 am to LPLGTiger
There are physical attributes that make me think that buck is young. At least "younger" than "mature". He's an "adolescent" buck. Genetics and habitat/nutrition play into whether he's 2-1/2 or 3-1/2 or 4-1/2.
Legs look long for body
General muscular/athletic looking build
Hind quarters more pronounced than front shoulders
Neck/brisket contour discontinuous
Neck not very girthy
If he's a piney forest buck, he could be 4-1/2. If he's a good soil/ag field buck, he might be 2-1/2. Where does he live?
Legs look long for body
General muscular/athletic looking build
Hind quarters more pronounced than front shoulders
Neck/brisket contour discontinuous
Neck not very girthy
If he's a piney forest buck, he could be 4-1/2. If he's a good soil/ag field buck, he might be 2-1/2. Where does he live?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 8:29 am to Guess_who
The teeth aging method isn't as accurate as most people rely on either. If the area the deer has lived in has more quartz in the soils the teeth will wear differently than those areas without.
We can argue intricacies of aging, and other than just showing each other who's pecker is longer, it doesn't really matter.
Mature or not is the basic question most hunters are searching for. In my opinion it's mostly accurate to use the metrics that most hunters use to guide them to answer that question. Rut activity being the main culprit to miss on the guessing. A deer that is post rut in our area will look significantly older and run down post rut than he did in the early fall.

We can argue intricacies of aging, and other than just showing each other who's pecker is longer, it doesn't really matter.
Mature or not is the basic question most hunters are searching for. In my opinion it's mostly accurate to use the metrics that most hunters use to guide them to answer that question. Rut activity being the main culprit to miss on the guessing. A deer that is post rut in our area will look significantly older and run down post rut than he did in the early fall.

Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:28 am to LPLGTiger
based on recent pictures of my puffed up 2 year olds around the house, I'd say 2.5.
They look more mature because of the swollen neck and thick coat... but you can tell the body is small based on the size of the coon in the pic.
They look more mature because of the swollen neck and thick coat... but you can tell the body is small based on the size of the coon in the pic.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:32 pm to 257WBY
quote:
what an age class looks like in your area
This is a major point missing from the OP. I've hunted leases where nutrition is so bad that a buck killed last year was aged by others to be 2.5 and once DMAP came back with analysis of the jaw bone, the deer was 5.5.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:53 pm to deathvalleytiger10
Typical occurrence on Louisiana pine plantations, the deer are usually at least a year older than they appear in my experiences.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 8:19 pm to LPLGTiger
Most likely 2.5. If I saw that deer in an area where they aren’t feeding protein and native nutrient ion wasn’t great, I’d say maybe 3.5. Definitely not 4.5.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 8:23 pm to LPLGTiger
non-shooter, that's all that matters.
Popular
Back to top

0






