Started By
Message

re: 300Blackout For Deer Hunting

Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:12 am to
Posted by SpookeyTiger
Williamsburg, MO
Member since Jan 2012
3532 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:12 am to
I’ve used the 110 V-Max on 2 deer and both dropped immediately. No exit wound but the insides were jellied. So far, I am ok with the performance as all the bullets energy was dumped inside the animal.

Have taken 3 with the 6.5 Grendel and none were immediate drops. Only ran 20-40 yards but good blood trail.

For my daughter’s 16th birthday I got her an AR in 300 BO. Great caliber for young shooters and as others have said, with the right ammunition, it will do the job. Works great suppressed!
Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
718 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Have taken 3 with the 6.5 Grendel and none were immediate drops. Only ran 20-40 yards but good blood trail.


What kind of bullet did you use?
Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
718 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 7:30 am to
quote:

I’m not understanding how people relate bullets that exit to poor blood? If you are shooting subsonic then yes you are likely doing less damage, just read any number of journals that discuss high velocity rifle shots and tissue damage.


I killed my first buck with a heart shot from a .270 with an old trophy bonded bear claw. The exit wound didn’t look any different than the entrance. I didn’t find a drop of blood, although, it didn't help that the area I was in was flooded. He jumped over several palmettos that should have easily showed at least some small drops of blood, but it didn't. I luckily found him by trailing his water drops on vegetation.

Sometimes bullets perform poorly regardless of shot placement. A high shot with a good exit wound is still going to produce enough blood to follow. It’s just hard to find a good bullet that expands well AND exits in these lower velocity calibers.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
10520 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Have taken 3 with the 6.5 Grendel and none were immediate drops. Only ran 20-40 yards but good blood trail.
I’ve had the exact same results. Barnes Vortex Tac TX bullet
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17323 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Read the thread ".223 for bear, elk and moose" on rokslide.com


That’s an interesting thread to say the least but I’ll emphasize that ammo selection being ultra critical part. They are really holding up the 77gr TMK with a 223/556 just being the vessel, but there’s a lot of other selling points to the chambering. Reading between the lines it sounds like sierra developed that bullet mostly for aloha snackbar hunting and it’s not a traditional target bullet at all.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

sounds like sierra developed that bullet mostly for aloha snackbar hunting and it’s not a traditional target bullet at all.


Yea, I think thats the prevailing idea out there.

I'm not going to go out advocating a .223 to anyone because of that. I dont think there's a factory loaded 77gr tmk available on the shelf anymore. They do like some other flavors of heavy .22 bullet as well, I think hornady ELDM is popular and widely available. I do think I'd prefer a .223 with heavy bullets to a .300BO though if I had to be using one of the two.
Posted by halleburton
Member since Dec 2009
1519 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

I've killed a couple dozen deer over the last several years with subsonic 300blk.


What bullet, and where are you aiming? Distance?
Posted by jgthunt
Walker
Member since Feb 2010
2464 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:13 am to
Check out discreet ballistics if you are wanting subsonic 300blk hunting rounds.
Posted by Sparetime
Lookin down at La
Member since Sep 2014
889 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:41 am to
Great idea, exactly what I did except different caliber.

6.8 SPC would be first choice and 6.5 Grendel would be second. 300BO is a excellent subsonic, but supers are like a toned down 30-30.

SPC and 277 wolverine will cook a 110gr Barnes down the powerline with ballistics closer to 308/7mm08. My 277W are still 1k/Lbs. to 370 yards, which is plenty for a deer.
Posted by SWHouston Tiger
Missouri City, TX
Member since Aug 2021
56 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 11:01 am to
I've killed 2 does and around 8-10 hogs with subsonic 300BO ammo. I don't remember which ammo below i used for deer or hogs, probably a combo of both. I used the hog hammer ammo first and couldn't find it any more (not sure if they still make it) and then moved on to the Hornady. Didn't notice much difference in stopping power or accuracy. All were shot within a 50 yard range. I kind of treat using sub 300BO similar to using a crossbow as far as acceptable range. all head shots and most dropped immediately. a few ran 10-20 yards. Most of these shots were in the 20-30 yard range with a solid rest. I think if you stay within a certain range and within your shooting limits sub 300 can be used ethically (or on par with a crossbow). Now days, if i hunt subsonic i'm using a subsonic 45-70. Much much greater stopping power with the 400+ grain subsonic bullet.

Hornady Subsonic Ammunition 300 AAC Blackout 190 Grain Sub-X FTX

Remington Hog Hammer Ammunition 300 AAC Blackout 130 Grain Barnes TSX Hollow Point Boat Tail
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17323 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 11:44 am to
quote:

all head shots


quote:

a few ran 10-20 yards


wat
Posted by SpookeyTiger
Williamsburg, MO
Member since Jan 2012
3532 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

What kind of bullet did you use?


Hornady 123 grain SST
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
1807 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

6.8 SPC would be first choice and 6.5 Grendel would be second.


Same muzzle energy, same recoil.

Grendel has better bullet selection, better sectional density, better ballistic coefficient, capable of using heavier bullets, more down range energy, sized “6-5” is more street cred, name is way cooler (monster from Epic of Beowulf). How can you say Grendel is second to SPC?
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6814 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

none were immediate drops.

For the most part, if a game animal drops immediately, it's because of:
-a specific shot (central nervous system or the brachial plexus "anchoring shot")
-a hunting bullet at really high velocity in the chest.
Otherwise, when a game animal drops immediately, it's not usually because of the bullet used.
Posted by This guy larry
Behind U
Member since Dec 2017
645 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

110 Barnes


Thats some bad azz bullets! If you're shooting within a 100 yds, it will do the job!
Posted by EFHogman
Member since May 2016
539 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 2:26 pm to
[/quote]
quote:

How can you say Grendel is second to SPC?


I don’t believe you’re comparing apples to apples. 6.8 beats Grendel if you’re both using 16 inch barrels. To get better ballistics the grendal has to use a 20 inch barrel.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
1807 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

To get better ballistics the grendal has to use a 20 inch barrel.


Yeah, so?

You can also buy cheap wolf ammo in 6.5G that you can buy in 6.8spc. Also you can make 6.5G brass from plentiful 7.62x39. 6.8 is a fatter, but lighter bullet that doesn’t penetrate as well, and with this range of muzzle energy on hog and deer sized animals you want more penetration. Plus just look at the cases side by side… the 6.8 with its short bullet looks like a scaled up .223 while the Grendel has that long sexy bullet. Winner Grendel.
Posted by EFHogman
Member since May 2016
539 posts
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

Yeah, so?


Yeah so? Some people don't want their rifle to look like a long pool stick when they hunt w a suppressor. These calibers have their pluses & minuses but to blindly say Grendel is better ballistics w/o noting the need for a longer barrel is misleading. And yeah the name Grendal is sexier.
Posted by SWHouston Tiger
Missouri City, TX
Member since Aug 2021
56 posts
Posted on 1/16/24 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

quote:
all head shots


quote:
a few ran 10-20 yards


wat



Yes, a few of the hogs ran or rather stumbled off 10 to 20 yards after. Not sure why this is in question.
Posted by 257WBY
Member since Feb 2014
5640 posts
Posted on 1/16/24 at 3:27 pm to
Critters running after head shots make for an unimpressive round.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram