- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why hasn't Louisiana had more of a plan for this disaster?
Posted on 5/28/10 at 12:44 pm to TenTex
Posted on 5/28/10 at 12:44 pm to TenTex
Louisiana is very cozy with BP because of the employment factor.
There has not been much hell raised towards BP. However once the oil gets on the white sandy beaches in FL. Hell would be raised and BPs sunny disposition would quickly fade.
There has not been much hell raised towards BP. However once the oil gets on the white sandy beaches in FL. Hell would be raised and BPs sunny disposition would quickly fade.
Posted on 5/28/10 at 12:44 pm to TenTex
Maybe if LA got any money from the activity we could do something for ourselves.
This was in FEDERAL waters on a FEDERAL lease. Perhaps if LA even got as much as TX does from the feds we could be a little more prepared.
Posted on 5/28/10 at 1:38 pm to Catman88
quote:
Just a question but what could LA do?
I think we should have had a lot more boom on hand in case of a major spill. I think we wasted a lot of time waiting to get more booms.
Posted on 5/28/10 at 1:38 pm to Jason9782003
Boom only helps with oil on the surface of the water.
Posted on 5/28/10 at 1:42 pm to Mudminnow
quote:
Louisiana is very cozy with BP because of the employment factor.
BP doesn't directly employee a lot of Louisiana residents.
quote:
However once the oil gets on the white sandy beaches in FL. Hell would be raised and BPs sunny disposition would quickly fade.
You can stop posting this same shite over and over. We got your shitty point already.
Posted on 5/28/10 at 2:37 pm to TenTex
Yes a sound plan should be in place. However this took place over federal waters, while Katrina is covered under the stafford act and the states have to speerhead the response
Secondly, we are getting screwed year of year not gettin our royalties.
Secondly, we are getting screwed year of year not gettin our royalties.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:53 am to TenTex
I would have liked to have seen the state and/or feds have enlisted all those fishermen beforehand as some sort of emergency response/national guard type deal where they do training for one week like once a year (not during fishing seasons) and have strategic stockpiles of boom and whatever other equipment they would need to deploy.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 6:18 am to Things and stuff
This is as about as dumb as saying why didn't new yourk have a plan for planes flying into their buildings...I mean come on...
Posted on 5/29/10 at 7:21 pm to back9Tiger
quote:
This is as about as dumb as saying why didn't new yourk have a plan for planes flying into their buildings...I mean come on...
So despite having thousands of oil rigs out in the GOM, you're saying this oil spill was just as unimaginable and unlikely as 9/11
Posted on 5/29/10 at 9:49 pm to Jason9782003
To this magnitude...yes. With all those wells in all these years, this is the first. Stop blaming LA.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 10:10 pm to TenTex
I hate to say this but when has Lousiana had a plan for anything?
Popular
Back to top

1








