- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You are Kyle Rittenhouse...what do you do now?
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:12 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:12 pm to Korkstand
quote:
The ONLY thing I'm saying here is that it was all easily avoidable. I don't think Rittenhouse should be demonized, but he shouldn't be held up as a hero, either.
I'm fairly neutral on his standing as hero, but he's the only one getting the "he shouldn't have been there" treatment. No one is saying there shouldn't have been violent riots or there shouldn't have been local politicians/leaders/law enforcement allowing this bullshite to go on. For some reason, he's getting the blame for all this and no one else.
2
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:18 pm to upgrayedd
quote:I think there are a lot of people on all sides saying there shouldn't have been violent riots and that leaders and law enforcement shouldn't have allowed it.
I'm fairly neutral on his standing as hero, but he's the only one getting the "he shouldn't have been there" treatment. No one is saying there shouldn't have been violent riots or there shouldn't have been local politicians/leaders/law enforcement allowing this bullshite to go on.
quote:The reason is probably because he's the one who killed people.
For some reason, he's getting the blame for all this and no one else.
What is your opinion on all those in here blaming the 2nd and 3rd people for getting shot for trying to disarm a person who had just killed someone?
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:18 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
there shouldn't have been local politicians/leaders/law enforcement allowing this bull shite to go on
They were all too busy making sure they weren't effected. The first responders and politicians of that area showed exactly what they thought of the peasants who serve them. If the people of the area had half a brain they would completely turnover all elected officials and find those who will serve the elected, not expect to be served by the electorate.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:19 pm to Korkstand
quote:
for getting shot for trying to disarm a person
Lol
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:20 pm to Korkstand
quote:
The reason is probably because he's the one who killed people.
Who
Were
Trying
To
Kill
Him
If it wasn't Kyle, it would have been someone else. You just don't get it. The left wing rioters werent peacefully protesting. This wasn't avoidable if Kyle was not there, he just happened to be present. And thank god.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:21 pm to Korkstand
quote:
for getting shot for trying to disarm a person who had just killed someone?
You are so in love with that dude. Your hero pulled a gun on Him. Your hero probably would have killed him.
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:23 pm to Korkstand
quote:
blaming the 2nd and 3rd people for getting shot for trying to disarm a person who had just killed someone?
Beating someone over the head and trying to curb stomp an individual on the ground isn't trying to disarm them. Doing this to someone running towards police saying he is going to turn himself in isn't doing this. Chanting "kill him, cranium him" while he is on the ground isn't doing this. Trying to execute him with a gun that jammed isn't trying to do this. You keep interjecting they were just trying to disarm him, what of the video, audio, or other evidence says they were trying to do anything other than kill him as he was running to turn himself in?
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:24 pm to Korkstand
quote:
What is your opinion on all those in here blaming the 2nd and 3rd people for getting shot for trying to disarm a person who had just killed someone?
Those people are correctly placing blame on the rioters. Had they just stayed home, they never would have been killed by a patriot protecting the community. They are responsible for a lot of money lost in property damage and now legal fees. Their fate was completely avoidable on their end.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:29 pm to jchamil
quote:Ding ding ding
Those people are correctly placing blame on the rioters. Had they just stayed home, they never would have been killed by a patriot protecting the community. They are responsible for a lot of money lost in property damage and now legal fees. Their fate was completely avoidable on their end.
Had they not rioted, none of this would have happened.
Their decision to riot is what caused this.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:31 pm to Korkstand
You see someone who killed people. I see someone that saved his own life from pedos and degenerates
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:31 pm to jchamil
quote:I agree that it was avoidable, but funny how you label them "rioters" with absolutely zero evidence. You think Rittenhouse was the only one there with good intentions? The first dude deserved it, but the 2nd and 3rd were fighting a perceived threat - just like Rittenhouse.
Those people are correctly placing blame on the rioters. Had they just stayed home, they never would have been killed by a patriot protecting the community. They are responsible for a lot of money lost in property damage and now legal fees. Their fate was completely avoidable on their end.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:32 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I think there are a lot of people on all sides saying there shouldn't have been violent riots and that leaders and law enforcement shouldn't have allowed it.
No one in the media has ever said that. Those are the ones with the most influence and they've been deafeningly silent.
quote:That's not the point I was making.
The reason is probably because he's the one who killed people.
quote:They were trying to kill him or cause great bodily harm as he was running away. That means they were the aggressors and he was 1000% within his rights to use deadly force. They weren't there to disarm him and turn him over to the cops, they were there to try to kill him. I don't know why you continue think the 2nd and 3rd people who were shot were some sort of altruistic duo trying to protect the community at large. They were both violent rioters who were there to burn a city down and cause mayhem by any means necessary. You have some sort of strange devotion to Grosskreutz as if he were just some innocent bystander. The truth is you have absolutely no clue what the guy even testified about but you saw some headline somewhere about how he was just trying to protect Kenosha from an "active shooter" and you've regurgitated that nonsense over 10 pages because you don't know what you're talking about.
What is your opinion on all those in here blaming the 2nd and 3rd people for getting shot for trying to disarm a person who had just killed someone?
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:33 pm to Korkstand
quote:
but the 2nd and 3rd were fighting a perceived threat
A kid running away is a threat?
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:34 pm to member12
Defamation lawsuits
Criminal harassment lawsuits
Libel lawsuits
Make as part of the settlement a demand for a public televised apology from each one
Criminal harassment lawsuits
Libel lawsuits
Make as part of the settlement a demand for a public televised apology from each one
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:35 pm to Deactived
quote:
A kid running away is a threat?
I'd say the chances of this dude doing any sort of research about this case extending beyond skimming twitter is hovering around 0%.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:36 pm to Korkstand
quote:
The first dude deserved it, but the 2nd and 3rd were fighting a perceived threat - just like Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse pursued nobody
These guys pursued Rittenhouse
Not the same, no matter how much you want it to be
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:37 pm to Korkstand
quote:
but funny how you label them "rioters" with absolutely zero evidence
Look at his marxist.
You telling me that Commie Pedo was there for good reason? He's on video starting the entire fisco.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:37 pm to Korkstand
quote:
, but the 2nd and 3rd were fighting a perceived threat
What did the second guy say? Or did you just make this up?
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:38 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
They were trying to kill him or cause great bodily harm as he was running away. That means they were the aggressors and he was 1000% within his rights to use deadly force. They weren't there to disarm him and turn him over to the cops, they were there to try to kill him. I don't know why you continue think the 2nd and 3rd people who were shot were some sort of altruistic duo trying to protect the community at large. They were both violent rioters who were there to burn a city down and cause mayhem by any means necessary.
So why were they attacking the armed man who had just killed someone instead of burning things and causing mayhem? Be honest now, you seriously don't see the biased view here?
quote:
You have some sort of strange devotion to Grosskreutz as if he were just some innocent bystander.
Posters in here talking about erecting statues to Rittenhouse, and I'm the one with a strange devotion to someone.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 4:38 pm to Korkstand
quote:
What is your opinion on all those in here blaming the 2nd and 3rd people for getting shot for trying to disarm a person who had just killed someone?
You mean the person who was in full retreat the entire time, and never presented his weapon until he was attacked by aggressors?
Page 18 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News