re: You are Kyle Rittenhouse...what do you do now?

quote:

---

I've yet to hear a leftist chastise Grosskreutz for masquerading as a medic or creating a dangerous situation by carrying a visible firearm. Just Rittenhouse.

---

Comrade Grosskreutz was just trying to stop an active shooter!

Gross was illegally concealing a firearm at the time.

A 17 year old kid crossed state lines with an AR to defend his country. The shameful part of that falls on us. We let Kyle down. The rest of us Americans are too big of pussies. But not Kyle. We need a lot more Kyles

quote:

---

A 17 year old kid crossed state lines with an AR to defend his country.

---

Oh for the love of fricking God. How many times is this bullshite going to be repeated?

Hey man, I'm gonna recommend you finish reading that post

facts are facts regardless of where you fall on this.

Sue, make millions, buy more guns and bang IG models.

quote:

---

The 2nd and 3rd people only attacked because he had killed the 1st, correct? Odds the first only attacked because he had a rifle?

---

Watching all the Periscopes and different videos as all this was happening and watching some of the court proceedings the first guy did not attack him because he had a gun. The first guy attacked him because he wouldn't let him burn down a building, and had been shown to be a good dude actually helping guys "Friendly, friendly". First guy thought it was a weak guy he could attack, take his gun, and then do who knows what. The first guy was unhinged, whether just that way personally or on some stuff. He throws what looks like a failed molotov cocktail (go light a paper bag and throw it, and then come back and tell me there wasn't something in that bag that was supposed to be an accelerant that didn't work out, you won't be able to throw it a third of the distance he did if the wind is heavy in your favor). He chased KR for about 150 yards and it wasn't until we hear a gun shot that KR turns around and end the obvious threat. 1st guy wasn't going after a "guy with a gun" as a good guy, but with ill intent to disarm him and do who knows what with the weapon.

Even if 2nd and 3rd guy are only attacking KR because he shot 1st guy, how does that have any effect on KR's self-defense? Because guy 2 and 3 our attempting to carry out vigilante style justice by killing a guy running towards police it's ok? They weren't trying to contain him and call the cops over. They were bashing him in the head, attempting to stomp his head into the concrete, take his gun from him, and finally trying to kill him execution style in the street after showing hands up. If my interpretation of the evidence is correct guy 3 would have killed KR had he not had a jam (possibly caused by double racking his pistol).

This all took place in less than 3 minutes. From KR saying "friendly, friendly" before being chased by guy 1 to the point he is pepper sprayed in the face by police when attempting to turn himself in. If your only argument in a murder trial is that the defendant is guilty of being less than 30 minutes from home that night then you don't have a good argument.

quote:

---

Kentucky people are just as bad... Stealing all the bourbon and causing supply shortages and driving my up the prices for honest citizens.

---

It's our bourbon. Just be grateful for the barrels y'all get

quote:

---

Y'all should stop. Because it doesn't matter.

---

Facts always matter.