- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WTF happened to JonBenet?
Posted on 9/20/16 at 6:44 pm to fatboydave
Posted on 9/20/16 at 6:44 pm to fatboydave
She died
Posted on 9/20/16 at 6:46 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
JonBenet fought valiantly, JonBenet fought nobly, JonBenet fought honorably.
And JonBenet died.
And JonBenet died.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 6:53 pm to AlonsoWDC
Watch the A&E report. takes an hour or so. Basically everything the cops said was a lie.
Foot prints in the snow....there was almost no snow.
Prior sexual abuse, medical records showed had vaginal bacterial infection. When one of cops experts here's this he retracts opinion.
Leaving on plane...Bull shite.
No way intruder could get into house, not only bullshite, they do it right on the show.
Missing for hour and half, bullshite.
died from blow to head, bullshite, she has scratch marks on her neck where she was trying to get rope off her neck.
Hispanic unknown DNA on here underwear and panties? Cops say irrelevant.
Stun gun marks on her neck and body? Cops say ignore
Suitcase by the window. say what?
Footprints under the grate? Cops say huh?
They are weird mfers, and the note is really bizarre, but the boy didn't kill her. could not have unless he can change his DNA.
Any cop that questioned their guilt was put off the case, their own expert told them it was intruder they fired him. DA would not indict because he know he would lose his arse, probably not even get to a jury.
Foot prints in the snow....there was almost no snow.
Prior sexual abuse, medical records showed had vaginal bacterial infection. When one of cops experts here's this he retracts opinion.
Leaving on plane...Bull shite.
No way intruder could get into house, not only bullshite, they do it right on the show.
Missing for hour and half, bullshite.
died from blow to head, bullshite, she has scratch marks on her neck where she was trying to get rope off her neck.
Hispanic unknown DNA on here underwear and panties? Cops say irrelevant.
Stun gun marks on her neck and body? Cops say ignore
Suitcase by the window. say what?
Footprints under the grate? Cops say huh?
They are weird mfers, and the note is really bizarre, but the boy didn't kill her. could not have unless he can change his DNA.
Any cop that questioned their guilt was put off the case, their own expert told them it was intruder they fired him. DA would not indict because he know he would lose his arse, probably not even get to a jury.
This post was edited on 9/20/16 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:00 pm to TutHillTiger
This happens daily, it is called "putting blinders on" and a type of group think.
I remember a local legendary defense lawyer used to walk around court room with his hands up like blinders and make mule sounds, and the jury would burst into laughter. (Yes he always won these cases that is why the street in front of the courthouse was named for him. He was DA for 20 years, he knew what could happen.
That is all that happened here.
It is a documentary with real scientist not entertainment TV.
LINK
I remember a local legendary defense lawyer used to walk around court room with his hands up like blinders and make mule sounds, and the jury would burst into laughter. (Yes he always won these cases that is why the street in front of the courthouse was named for him. He was DA for 20 years, he knew what could happen.
That is all that happened here.
It is a documentary with real scientist not entertainment TV.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/20/16 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:00 pm to TutHillTiger
BamaChick already pointed out how much bullshite was in the A&E doc the first time you brought it up.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:06 pm to nvasil1
Bama chick is a idiot, and has no experience with law enforcement or the law. My dog said "ruff" too so they must be guilty. I thought they were guilty too, but unlike the "OJ Jurors" on here followed the science which says they can not be.
It really amazes me how fricking easily mislead by the media people are now.
LINK
If Lou Smit said they didn't do it, that is enough for me and everyone in law enforcement I have ever known. He was that fricking good.
It really amazes me how fricking easily mislead by the media people are now.
LINK
If Lou Smit said they didn't do it, that is enough for me and everyone in law enforcement I have ever known. He was that fricking good.
This post was edited on 9/20/16 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:09 pm to nvasil1
I've watched the puff pieces on both sides, CBS, A&E, Dr Phil.
I don't care what anybody says, that interview they did the week after on CNN or whatever, John and Patsy are lying their arses off when they answer the question, "Are you fully convinced that your daughter was kidnapped by some outsiders outside your family or circle of friends?" The killer on the loose answer. If you can't tell they are lying, you have blinders on.
I don't care what anybody says, that interview they did the week after on CNN or whatever, John and Patsy are lying their arses off when they answer the question, "Are you fully convinced that your daughter was kidnapped by some outsiders outside your family or circle of friends?" The killer on the loose answer. If you can't tell they are lying, you have blinders on.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:09 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Bama chick is a idiot
Classic
And you link an Us Weekly article.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:43 pm to Dr RC
quote:
that could be nothing more than him dealing w/a sudden rush of emotion caused by him remembering how his dead sister used to really like pineapple.
Can't be that because he didn't even know what was in the bowl. He was trying to figure out what he could say to take the focus off the pineapple(that he knew was in the bowl)and he came up with cereal lol. That little dude is smarter than people want to give him credit for. Creepy for sure but smart too
This post was edited on 9/20/16 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:46 pm to TutHillTiger
Lol tut. Those points are so stupid.. and here we go again with the DNA.. which was ruled inconclusive and could be a result of anything..
DNA is not solving this case.
That article is every bit as bias as the other side of the tv airings..
I mean those are really weak arguments.
THAT IS SUCH A FREAKING BIAS ARTICLE.. LOOK AT THIS CRAP..
Um.. he could have easily lost a temper in a moment and struct just once without true death intent.. and could have killed her easily over just one blow.. to find this notion laughable.. is actually the absurd thing..
What a fricking idiot of an author.
Any ways,
Watching clips of the mom speaking.. I just can't help but feel she comes off as fake. I could be wrong, but just the vibe I got. And this was before I knew much about the case. Just watching from an non bias POV at the time.
DNA is not solving this case.
That article is every bit as bias as the other side of the tv airings..
I mean those are really weak arguments.
THAT IS SUCH A FREAKING BIAS ARTICLE.. LOOK AT THIS CRAP..
quote:
Burke — once thought of as a potential suspect by author James Kollar, a former investigator on the case — was exonerated by DNA evidence in 1999. Of the accusations against his son, John Ramsey told the camera, “The accusation that Burke is some violent 90-pound, 9-year-old-child … is laughable. I’m sorry — I can’t think of a better word. It’s absurd.”
Um.. he could have easily lost a temper in a moment and struct just once without true death intent.. and could have killed her easily over just one blow.. to find this notion laughable.. is actually the absurd thing..
What a fricking idiot of an author.
Any ways,
Watching clips of the mom speaking.. I just can't help but feel she comes off as fake. I could be wrong, but just the vibe I got. And this was before I knew much about the case. Just watching from an non bias POV at the time.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:54 pm to TutHillTiger
Oh, good, we have another intruder believer.
I have but one line of questions for you at the moment :
Please, with sincerity, explain the "ransom note", with regards to
A. Who wrote it?
B. When was it written?
C. Why was it written?
I have but one line of questions for you at the moment :
Please, with sincerity, explain the "ransom note", with regards to
A. Who wrote it?
B. When was it written?
C. Why was it written?
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:56 pm to TutHillTiger
As I said before about that A&E "documentary" -
That "documentary" was produced by Mills Production and along with Michael Tracey - who was shown in this "documentary" as an unbiased "expert - have a long history with John and Patsy Ramsey and have been proven to have included lies and distortions of this case in their FOUR previous "documentaries" on the Jon Benet case.
That Dutch "DNA expert" that was interviewed in the A&E "documentary"?
The DNA test mentioned over and over only used four markers, instead of the standard 13 - they left that tidbit of info out.
Basically, that A&E "documentary" was absolute, utter, biased garbage.
Please look up the history of John and Patsy Ramsey, Michael Tracey, and Mills Production before you call someone else an idiot. Idiot.
That "documentary" was produced by Mills Production and along with Michael Tracey - who was shown in this "documentary" as an unbiased "expert - have a long history with John and Patsy Ramsey and have been proven to have included lies and distortions of this case in their FOUR previous "documentaries" on the Jon Benet case.
That Dutch "DNA expert" that was interviewed in the A&E "documentary"?
quote:
"A Denver prosecutor got Eikelenboom to admit that he had no direct DNA extraction or analysis experience, that he operates a lab that has not been accredited, that he personally failed his basic proficiency texts in 2011 and 2012, and admitted that he was a 'self-trained' in running DNA profiles," the DA's office said.
The DNA test mentioned over and over only used four markers, instead of the standard 13 - they left that tidbit of info out.
Basically, that A&E "documentary" was absolute, utter, biased garbage.
Please look up the history of John and Patsy Ramsey, Michael Tracey, and Mills Production before you call someone else an idiot. Idiot.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 7:59 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Please, with sincerity, explain the "ransom note", with regards to A. Who wrote it? B. When was it written? C. Why was it written?
And not only that.
Why is there no mention whatsoever of any of his remaining family members?
Why not mention his son? Why not go after his son? Why no mention of his wife?
Why only kill her? Why stop there with the ransom note? You kidding me.
Why say, "use that southern charm John"
And then why were all those violent acts against her done hours after the initial first blow?? Huh?
Posted on 9/20/16 at 8:00 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
If Lou Smit said they didn't do it, that is enough for me and everyone in law enforcement I have ever known. He was that fricking good.
Please post the theory of Lou fricking Smit? I'll be waiting. That crime scene was so fricked up before he even got there. His investigation was done after 20 fricking people roamed around the house. He can't dismiss the letter,the cob webs, the stun gun(which he thought was true and proved not to be), the pineapple, the 911 call. Nothing! Lou Smit may be a good investigator but this was not his from the get go like most are. He had no control over it
Posted on 9/20/16 at 9:15 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
No way intruder could get into house, not only bullshite, they do it right on the show.
Sure Lu Smit got thru that window, but the intruder would have gotten in AND OUT leaving this?
Sorry aint happening. There was no intruder. Once you come to that understanding, then the rest is staged

Posted on 9/20/16 at 9:15 pm to Howyouluhdat
I REALLY wish they had gotten Fleet White to appear on camera.
Here is an interview with The Whites from 2014.
(That right there is some horsehit!)
(Never knew about the Lockheed Martin angle. Could definitely see that having an influence on a DA worried about politics and reelection funds.)
(That's they guy behind the A&E "documentary".)
(Michael Tracey. Again. So unbiased.
)
(Yep. That DNA "evidence" is so rock solid.)
Here is an interview with The Whites from 2014.
quote:
In the last few months, though, the Whites have become far more outspoken in their long quest for answers. They have been emboldened by the release late last year of documents indicating that in 1999 the JonBenét grand jury had voted to indict John and Patsy Ramsey on a charge of felony child abuse resulting in death and on an accessory charge; Hunter declined to sign the indictments, which remained a secret for more than a decade. The Whites have gone to court, seeking to get still-suppressed pages of those "true bills" released. They have appeared before the Boulder City Council, seeking other documents related to the case.
quote:
The Ramseys maintained that it was the Whites who broke off contact. For a little while, the Whites continued to receive little notes and cards from the Ramseys, but nothing they regarded as a serious invitation to get together. Priscilla noticed that Patsy's handwriting was different, altered in several respects from what it had been before the death of JonBenét.
quote:
Even as the police struggled to process a crime scene they'd failed to control, the hunt for evidence began to bog down amid procedural and legal hurdles. It was months before investigators were able to obtain the clothing the Ramseys had worn the night their daughter was killed, and even longer before they could get access to the parents' phone records and credit-card bills.
(That right there is some horsehit!)
quote:
Some prosecutors believed the detectives were too fixated on the parents as suspects and failed to adequately explore other leads. Cops accused the DA of being too chummy with (or intimidated by) the Ramsey legal team, too quick to share evidence and lab results with the Ramsey legal team, depriving the police of any tactical advantage.
quote:
As the Whites saw it, various entities connected to the case had strong reasons for delaying a grand-jury investigation. Hunter, whose office rarely went to trial on homicide cases, was just one. Lockheed Martin, one of the state's largest employers, was another. The company had been attempting to sell Access Graphics at the time JonBenét was killed. Any risk that the company's top executive would be facing a possible indictment would not have helped the divestment plans.
(Never knew about the Lockheed Martin angle. Could definitely see that having an influence on a DA worried about politics and reelection funds.)
quote:
They [Fleet and Priscilla White] bent the ears of CU's Board of Regents about Michael Tracey's biased documentaries.
(That's they guy behind the A&E "documentary".)
quote:
In 2006 it led to creepster John Mark Karr, a teacher in Thailand who was fascinated with the case. Karr struck up an anonymous, online relationship with documentarian Michael Tracey and, in a flood of e-mails and phone calls, fine-tuned a confession to the murder he'd been working on for years. With the aid of Smit and other investigators, Tracey reeled Karr in. Boulder authorities flew him to Colorado amid much hubbub and expense. A few days later they released him, amid much ridicule and disgust, when it turned out that his DNA didn't match the underwear sample and that Karr hadn't even been in Boulder at the time of the murder.
(Michael Tracey. Again. So unbiased.
quote:
Since it was issued, Lacy's exoneration has been routinely cited in most news stories about the Ramsey case, usually in a way that implies the Ramseys have been positively and unambiguously "cleared by DNA." But Kolar considers the letter to be misleading at best. It fails to mention that investigators also found unidentified DNA from two males and one female under the victim's fingernails -- samples too tiny and badly degraded to put into a database or even determine if they came from blood or skin tissues. They also gathered additional samples of DNA from two males that came from the cord and garrote used in the crime. None of these samples match each other or the touch DNA obtained from the clothing.
"DNA can be very helpful in any criminal investigation, but it needs to be looked at in the context of all the other evidence," Kolar says. "If you look at all the trace samples involved in this, if you follow the DNA evidence solely, then we should be looking for six perpetrators, not one."
(Yep. That DNA "evidence" is so rock solid.)
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:02 pm to BamaChick
The two holes on her back were not taser marks. They matched perfectly the toy train track pieces. Burke poked her with one of them to see if she was still alive. Burke was angry because she was eating his pineapple and he snapped for a moment and smacked her over her head with the flash light. She had pineapple in her digestive tract.
The rest was just an elaborate cover up to protect Burke and the families image.
The rest was just an elaborate cover up to protect Burke and the families image.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:15 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Stun gun marks on her neck and body? Cops say ignore
Those were not stun gun marks
The CBS crew stunned a person on the show, and the marks looked nothing similar to JonBenet. Nothing
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:34 pm to RobbBobb
Unfortunately, I doubt that Dr Phil's pecuniary interests in the case will ever be disclosed since it's not anything that would be admissible in a case to show bias.
But I will bet my house that Dr Phil was paid shite tons of money to put on that puff piece. He explained away that completely bizarre behavior by Burke, but I call bull shite. There is no way a credible behavior psychologist would call Burke's behavior in those Dr Phil interviews 'normal.' And if you objectively look at the interviews when he was a kid, you have to be struck by how emotionless and extremely smart that little guy was. It's scary. He did it. It was probably an accident but he did it.
But I will bet my house that Dr Phil was paid shite tons of money to put on that puff piece. He explained away that completely bizarre behavior by Burke, but I call bull shite. There is no way a credible behavior psychologist would call Burke's behavior in those Dr Phil interviews 'normal.' And if you objectively look at the interviews when he was a kid, you have to be struck by how emotionless and extremely smart that little guy was. It's scary. He did it. It was probably an accident but he did it.
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:35 pm to BamaChick
quote:
I REALLY wish they had gotten Fleet White to appear on camera.
As do I. He was in the basement alone not long after he arrived and even claimed to walk into the wine cellar, but couldn't find the light. It makes me wonder if he noticed something he didn't report or only thought to be suspicious later.
The Lockheed Martin part is certainly interesting, too.
Back to top


1






