Started By
Message

re: WSJ: The U.K.’s Healthcare System Is in Crisis; 500 die every week due to treatment delays

Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:12 am to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55490 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:12 am to
quote:

But with that said, what $ amount are these CEO’s overlooking? $100’s of Billions of dollars? The responsibility to oversee that amount of business is never ending and pressure packed. That’s what the compensation is for.



The people that complain about healthcare CEO salaries have no problem with the Obama administration straight up losing $4 billion in Obamacare funds. They don't request accountability, they don't demand to know the salaries of these government workers. And these are tax dollars, not private money.

I have no pity for socialist/communists/marxists on here who yearn for government control of everything, because, frankly, they are too stupid to realize the things they get mad about with private industry, happens tenfold in government, with YOUR TAX DOLLARS, and posters like Bronc will outright attack you if you demand accountability from the bureacracy.
This post was edited on 2/7/23 at 8:15 am
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
39949 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:13 am to
quote:

that they can’t comprehend demanding free healthcare in exchange for their compulsory taxes.


You are absolutely retarded

The downfall of the Roman republic began when the plebs realized they could vote themselves other people’s’ money.

That is EXACTLY what you are championing here. Rather than demanding we make it easier to start business, make it easier to be your own boss, you’re arguing just to take from those that make more than you.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
172266 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:13 am to
quote:

My wife's hospital is STILL operating above guidelines for patient/nurse ratios in an acute care unit most days of the week. So simply put, you don't know what the frick you are talking about.

It’s flu season, retard. It may be busy but it’s not going to run out of beds.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55490 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:14 am to
quote:

We never once ran out of hospital beds during Covid. One of the biggest fake news fear mongering tactics during the pandemic.




The same people that believe this, are still clinging to masks.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
25694 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:17 am to
These government-run healthcare systems the left has told us were shining beacons of light have always been disasters. That's not to say the US healthcare system is perfect. Its biggest downfall is medicare/Medicaid being robbed blind and the insurance middleman that hinders competition based on price.

They use stats like life expectancy to distort reality. Americans die earlier, but it has nothing to do with the healthcare system.

Two stories: I have a colleague who became critically sick on an Italian vacation. He spent the night in two separate hospitals there. The conditions he described were almost unbelievable. Something out of a horror film.

Canadian friend who lives in the states. His brother tore up his shoulder in an accident. He was told he had to wait eight months for surgery. Gets addicted to pain pills to try to get through it. Kills himself.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:18 am to
quote:


Above guidelines you say? So they are turning people away and requiring months and years wait times for routine services?


Again, given this is your response you don't seem to understand even basic healthcare terminology and context, you are just operating off talking points.

An acute care unit is a short-term emergency care unit. These are the units you absolutely do not want to be running over capacity, and yet we are, as a default right now in most hospitals in the area we live in, and was even worse back in BR talking to people still working there.

That means you have nurses that should be having 2-3 patients now trying to cover 4-5 or more. That means every aspect of care suffers and patients pay the price. Why? Because most hospitals REFUSE to increase baseline pay, refuse to add permanent bonus structures. Instead they use a cadre of temp methods that still fall short but you better believe the top staff are still pulling in enormous high 6 and even 7 figure incomes and are raking in record profits while putting their thumb on the scale and bureaucratizing patient-care relationships as a consequence, leading to even more issues.

the best salaries and QOL are in specialty care, most often non-critical. So the market bends toward those areas, which leaves an enormous deficit in necessary primary care physicians and nurses to cover the most important general and critical care that is most important in preventing long-term issues and keeping people alive and not suffering during emergencies.

quote:

And would the hospital have been understaffed had they not fired a shite load of nurses due to the reduction of patients seen by shutting down all non emergency procedures


It's almost like you get it but refuse to get it.

Even in emergencies the model of healthcare in this country trends toward maintaining the thinnest of margins. Why did hospitals lay off staff? Money, pure and simple. Then the hospitals realized they cut too deep and struggled to bring back nurses, many that just left the field or went into temp service. many cut off their nose to spite their face but still refuse to do the sensible thing and raise baseline wages.
This post was edited on 2/7/23 at 8:20 am
Posted by CBP3110
Member since Aug 2012
6599 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:18 am to
Bingo, most docs these days are pussys when it comes to dealing with administration.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43305 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:19 am to
quote:

These government-run healthcare systems the left has told us were shining beacons of light have always been disasters. That's not to say the US healthcare system is perfect. Its biggest downfall is medicare/Medicaid being robbed blind and the insurance middleman that hinders competition based on price.



We've crippled our free market here and bitch about rising costs. It's amazing. Get the gov't out of healthcare, deregulate the system.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25984 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:22 am to
We have an incredible healthcare setup in the US. It’s not perfect. No system is. But I appreciate it like millions of others do.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:24 am to
quote:


We've crippled our free market here and bitch about rising costs. It's amazing. Get the gov't out of healthcare, deregulate the system.



Good luck with that once you turn 70 and no insurer wants to insure you without charging you $100,000 a year. No returning soldier with chronic care needs can get coverage. And the government subsidies hiding behind your employer plan go away and you see your rates jump through the roof.

Maybe we can just do like the cult in midsommar and start throwing all the old people off a cliff at 65?
This post was edited on 2/7/23 at 8:25 am
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
31845 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

The idea of conflating the UK with, say, Canada and Switzerland and just labeling it all "Public Healthcare" vs American healthcare is absurd.

I already said Canada is a terrible comparison to U.K. or US. Same for Switzerland but even more. Populations and cultures are extremely different from the US. They don’t have a lower class that abuses govt welfare
This post was edited on 2/7/23 at 8:31 am
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:34 am to
I love it when people that don't work in healthcare are experts on how it works.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:41 am to
quote:

They don’t have a lower class that abuses govt welfare

Just say you don't want minorities and the poor to have benefits, it would be a lot more honest..

Most countries don't frame their entitlement programs like a class war and through the prism of the deserving and undeserving poor, but you are absolutely wrong if you don't think those countries have grift

It's the tradeoff that comes with having a safety net, there are going to be people that take advantage and that avoid the checks and balances. People that spend 20 years going to college on the government dime, or don't work but have multiple kids. That happens anywhere. But the overall net effect is a more well-taken-care-of country, often with a better baseline QOL.

quote:

I already said Canada is a terrible comparison to U.K. or US. Same for Switzerland but even more


Considering America literally has all three of those models within our overall umbrella, there is plenty of relevancy. But like all things, America takes what others do and retards it up. Switzerland is a perfect example to illustrate that contrast.

This post was edited on 2/7/23 at 8:43 am
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25984 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Just say you don't want minorities and the poor to have benefits, it would be a lot more honest..



That's a hell of a strawman.
Posted by Cymry Teigr
Member since Sep 2012
2131 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:51 am to
While the NHS has always sucked thus leading to the creation of privatized and supplemental operations like BUPA (which has been around for half a century), one thing these studies and reports on the wait times for UK doctors and hospitals ignores is that it’s largely come about as a result of the exact same class of patients you see lined up at OLOL trying to get their minor ailment treated in an ER and squawking loudly when they aren’t prioritized over someone in crisis.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
31845 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Just say you don't want minorities and the poor to have benefits, it would be a lot more honest..

That’s a hell of a stretch and you know it. Make a logical argument rather than jumping to crying racism to win

quote:

Considering America literally has all three of those models within our overall umbrella, there is plenty of relevancy. But like all things, America takes what others do and retards it up. Switzerland is a perfect example to illustrate that contrast.

US is not and will never be Switzerland. Switzerland is comparable to a single state in the US, not the entire country. Compare to the entire EU if you want a fair, logical comparison
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55490 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Good luck with that once you turn 70 and no insurer wants to insure you without charging you $100,000 a year.


Or you can take the socialized model and your longevity will be decided by death panels because cost is now a factor.

quote:

No returning soldier with chronic care needs can get coverage.


Hmmm, i seem to recall a government healthcare system for vets. It was called the VA.

quote:

Maybe we can just do like the cult in midsommar and start throwing all the old people off a cliff at 65?




You mean like...death panels??? Every problem you think you have with private healthcare, is actually a feature of government healthcare.
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
5509 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 8:58 am to
The problem with the US health system is the US population. Maybe if damn near everyone wasnt fat we could have a great system...One can dream
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:00 am to
Single-payer is not the light at the end of the tunnel that socialists seem to think it is. When government gets involved in dishing out healthcare services, it'll be rationed out based on what politicians think is needed. Need knee replacement surgery? Suck it up. It's not a life and death medical issue. You're 75 and have been diagnosed with an aggressive form of leukemia? Well...sucks to suck but we're going to give the money for treatment to this 58-year-old instead. Their chances of living are better and you have only about three or four years left anyway if we go by the average lifespan of an American.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:00 am to
quote:



Or you can take the socialized model and your longevity will be decided by death panels because cost is now a factor.


Just like happened with Obamacare amirite?

Also, not the best argument when America is one of the only countries currently with a declining life expectancy and one of the lowest in the developed world....



quote:

Hmmm, i seem to recall a government healthcare system for vets. It was called the VA.


Poster wants the government out of healthcare....Good luck convincing Aetna to affordably(or freely) insure a soldier with chronic lifetime needs due to injuries.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram