- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/28/26 at 2:59 pm to fightin tigers
quote:If failing to immediately agree to every demand presented by the other side of a negotiation constitutes an "imminent threat" then any president has a green light to attack any nation for any pretextual reason.
I believe he will use them "backing away" from the table on Thursday.
"We demand that you unilaterally disarm, surrender 99% of your territory, and pay us five years of your nation's GDP in gold, immediately."
"What? Of course not."
"Imminent threat!"
Posted on 2/28/26 at 2:59 pm to Swagga
quote:
Because that to me is an actual war. I’m confident in our air superiority and our ability to defend a base and keep troops safe.
Well, when you bomb a country and kill their political leaders… that is war.
I too hope we don’t have troops deployed but let’s not split hairs here. This is war
This post was edited on 2/28/26 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:01 pm to RIPMachoMan
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:01 pm to hg
quote:
This image is from the "Crash" multiplayer map, featured in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and other titles in the series
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:02 pm to Chuck Barris
quote:
If failing to immediately agree to every demand presented by the other side of a negotiation constitutes an "imminent threat"
Well that isn't what happened. The negotiations have been ongoing. They had no intention of budging.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:02 pm to fightin tigers
But that was exactly what Trump said in June though.
But now they are close again?
See the video posted last page. Closer for 30 years?
. That said I think Iran, north Korea and Cuba need to be toppled. And I'll support any action against those countries.
But now they are close again?
See the video posted last page. Closer for 30 years?
. That said I think Iran, north Korea and Cuba need to be toppled. And I'll support any action against those countries.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:02 pm to Napoleon
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:03 pm to AHM21
quote:I've thought this too. He's a Blue Dog Democrat in a party full of proud socialists. It's crazy how his party vilified him for wearing a suit and shaking the President's hand at the SOTU.
Dude just needs to go ahead and change parties
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:04 pm to Napoleon
quote:
That said I think Iran, north Korea and Cuba need to be toppled. And I'll support any action against those countries.
I agree, but we’ve been here before. What are we signing up for after toppling?
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:04 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Not even close. Just set them back.
Is that what obliterated means? Because Trump said Iran's nuclear facilities were "completely and totally obliterated."
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:04 pm to RIPMachoMan
Honestly, the entire world should jump when Isr…we say jump. Anybody that isn’t on board is fair game.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:05 pm to nvasil1
I don't think you should use Trump as your source on the technical infrastructure of Iran's nuclear capabilities.
He also said crime in New Orleans had completely stopped.
He also said crime in New Orleans had completely stopped.
This post was edited on 2/28/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:06 pm to HempHead
quote:
Honestly, the entire world should jump when Isr…we say jump.
I can’t argue. You’re not wrong
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:08 pm to RIPMachoMan
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. It’s been another top tier day on Twitter. The platform was made for days like this.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:08 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
I don't think you should use Trump as your source on the technical infrastructure of Iran's nuclear capabilities.
Whether I agree or not about the decision to go to war with Iran, I have full belief that our military leadership has planned to prevent any chance of nuclear retaliation
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:09 pm to RIPMachoMan
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:10 pm to RIPMachoMan
A good manager let's his people use their expertise and try not to interfere too much. Maybe draw fire from those when their people are under pressure.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:10 pm to Slippy
quote:
I never imagined I would prefer the Iran war thread on the poli board to the OT. But here we are.
They hate us for our freedom right? Redux of 2002. Do most Americans know Saddam was our ally in the 1980's? We provided him money, weapons and training to invade Iran twice, which killed 1 million Iranians. That's equivalent to 9/11 every day for a year. Then a few years later, Saddam was a threat to us and world stability. Then a decade later, he was developing WMD's which somehow never surfaced.
This post was edited on 2/28/26 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 2/28/26 at 3:10 pm to Stat M Repairman
Page 27 of 111
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News