- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/26/23 at 3:45 pm to NATidefan
quote:
Now I'm to the point I want to lawyer up.
You were too nice in the beginning, but I get it. Not sure what to tell you over $200 two years later, though.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:00 pm to NATidefan
Sounds like that is your only option now. If it’s fast food chain it would benefit them to keep paying the bills. Now it will probably cost them a whole lot more.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 6:49 pm to NATidefan
Gordon will take care of this
Posted on 5/26/23 at 6:55 pm to NATidefan
I would post the story on Twitter and tag the company. Corporate social media accounts won’t want the bad publicity and will pay the bill quickly
Posted on 5/26/23 at 7:12 pm to johnnyrocket
quote:I do not know about Alabama but in Mississippi you have to list the Work Comp Carrier and the 3rd Party Administrator name, address and contact information on the labor law Poster that every business must post in a common area.
A lawyer can tell you the companies insurance company info
If the OP story is true (it's not) a company would gladly settle a $200 nuisance claim in a matter of minutes after contact.
Posted on 5/26/23 at 8:14 pm to NATidefan
People get lawyers for less. They are obligated to pay that bill. They maybe penalties and fees for late unpaid bills.
Posted on 5/27/23 at 2:32 am to NATidefan
Haven’t read the whole thread, but this happened at work and should have been filed with the comp carrier. It was an intentional act and not an accident per se. Comp is the sole remedy for an accident.
An attorney would not have filed the claim under the work comp portion of the policy, but would/should have filed under the Employer Liability portion of work comp policy since it wasn’t an “accident” and was an intention act. The comp carrier would have sent the suit for a review to determine if they had a duty defend.
Ultimately, the carrier would have likely settled.
An attorney would not have filed the claim under the work comp portion of the policy, but would/should have filed under the Employer Liability portion of work comp policy since it wasn’t an “accident” and was an intention act. The comp carrier would have sent the suit for a review to determine if they had a duty defend.
Ultimately, the carrier would have likely settled.
Posted on 5/27/23 at 5:21 am to NATidefan
frick them. Why the hell not. They were negligent
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News