- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you drive this? 1974 Ford Mustang
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:13 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:13 am
Since the AMC Pacer wagon thread drew some interesting responses, I thought I'd bring another 1970s icon to the OT for consideration:
The second generation Mustang was introduced in 1973 as a 1974 model. It was nearly 500 lbs lighter than the original Mustang, and provided excellent fuel economy in the rare circumstances where the car was operable.
As they are today, Ford loyalist of 1974 were willing to overlook issues with reliability, safety, and performance - so the second generation Mustang (AKA, the Mustang II) proved to be popular. Many design aspects of the modern Mustang can be traced back to the Mustang II - including the shape of the front grill, rear tail light design, availability of a 2.3L 4 cylinder engine, and the trademark dash of build quality mistakes.
Like modern Mustangs, this Mustang II's base engine is a 4 cylinder displacing 2.3 Liters. In 1974, this engine produced 88 horsepower. A variant of this 2.3L engine was also used in the Ford Pinto, which was a huge piece of shite. The Ford Pinto also donated its frame and platform to the Mustang for the 1974 model year.
LINK
I can't find any performance numbers for this model. I would assume that it can reach a top speed of about 75 MPH. The quarter mile trap speed is probably in the upper 50s. 0-60 is somewhere between 18-20 second range.
Unfortunately, the oil embargo of this era did result in a host of lame products from Detroit at the time. So if you like the Mustang II (as an ironic statement or out of sincere infatuation for the ugly duckling), there are plenty of other examples of vehicles just like this one out there. Not as many people are excited to restore them though.
Would the OT drive this piece of rolling history? This was a popular car in 1974.
Check out that red carpet....
The second generation Mustang was introduced in 1973 as a 1974 model. It was nearly 500 lbs lighter than the original Mustang, and provided excellent fuel economy in the rare circumstances where the car was operable.
As they are today, Ford loyalist of 1974 were willing to overlook issues with reliability, safety, and performance - so the second generation Mustang (AKA, the Mustang II) proved to be popular. Many design aspects of the modern Mustang can be traced back to the Mustang II - including the shape of the front grill, rear tail light design, availability of a 2.3L 4 cylinder engine, and the trademark dash of build quality mistakes.
Like modern Mustangs, this Mustang II's base engine is a 4 cylinder displacing 2.3 Liters. In 1974, this engine produced 88 horsepower. A variant of this 2.3L engine was also used in the Ford Pinto, which was a huge piece of shite. The Ford Pinto also donated its frame and platform to the Mustang for the 1974 model year.
LINK
I can't find any performance numbers for this model. I would assume that it can reach a top speed of about 75 MPH. The quarter mile trap speed is probably in the upper 50s. 0-60 is somewhere between 18-20 second range.
Unfortunately, the oil embargo of this era did result in a host of lame products from Detroit at the time. So if you like the Mustang II (as an ironic statement or out of sincere infatuation for the ugly duckling), there are plenty of other examples of vehicles just like this one out there. Not as many people are excited to restore them though.
Would the OT drive this piece of rolling history? This was a popular car in 1974.
Check out that red carpet....
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 10:17 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:16 am to goofball
Nope, that car is ugly as shite. Now if you’re talking a 1964.5-1969 model Mustang, yes I would.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:16 am to goofball
That's a "Mustang II." IOW, a glorified Pinto - not a real Mustang.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:18 am to goofball
quote:
1974 Ford Mustang
This is such a shitty car.
It still took 35 years after that for Ford to figure out how to make it not suck so badly.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:18 am to goofball
I would honestly pick it up for the right price. I still prefer the 66 I had though
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:19 am to goofball
Does anyone know if someone has written a book about what the frick happened to car design from 1975-2000?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:19 am to goofball
you damn right i would.
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 10:23 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:20 am to HempHead
quote:
Does anyone know if someone has written a book about what the frick happened to car design from 1975-2000?
Drugs, lots of it
Although we have had some great car designs in that Era from Europe and USA
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 10:22 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:26 am to HempHead
The 70s took a hit due to fuel prices. Government regulation hasn't helped design imo
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:26 am to Dragula
quote:
Does anyone know if someone has written a book about what the frick happened to car design from 1975-2000?
An oil embargo followed by Carter era economy forced Detroit to make small, cheap cars to stay afloat.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:30 am to BuckeyeFan87
quote:
Nope, that car is ugly as shite. Now if you’re talking a 1964.5-1969 model Mustang, yes I would.
Even the 1973 model was better than the Mustang II. It wasn't good...but it was better.
While we are at it, the 1980s and 1990s were a horrible time for the Mustang too.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:32 am to jmarto1
quote:
The 70s took a hit due to fuel prices. Government regulation hasn't helped design imo
Is that why they forgot to install a passenger's side mirror?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:34 am to goofball
Could I get rolling flames coming down each side from burning skulls on the front bumper? I'd also want those shocks that would jump the body up in the air and then just a quickly drop it back down to low rider position. An air horn that played La Cucaracha would be nice as well as a fur dash. And boom box speakers.
Oh curb feelers, too. And Glass Pack pipes.
If those modifications were made, then Yes. Would be a show car the little kids would stop and watch as it went by.
Maybe a marijuana leaf on the back trunk panel to give you something to see after it passed by.
And a snazzy bumper sticker that said:
"I may be slow, but I'm ahead of you."
Oh curb feelers, too. And Glass Pack pipes.
If those modifications were made, then Yes. Would be a show car the little kids would stop and watch as it went by.
Maybe a marijuana leaf on the back trunk panel to give you something to see after it passed by.
And a snazzy bumper sticker that said:
"I may be slow, but I'm ahead of you."
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 10:37 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:35 am to goofball
Absolute worst mustang years ever. What a dog.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:38 am to goofball
Glorified Ford Pinto.
My father had a brown Ford Pinto station wagon with curtains inside and brown exterior paneling.
That little car could haul tail.
My father gave it to me and I sold it for a used Mazda 4x4 truck with a wankle rotary engine.
My father had a brown Ford Pinto station wagon with curtains inside and brown exterior paneling.
That little car could haul tail.
My father gave it to me and I sold it for a used Mazda 4x4 truck with a wankle rotary engine.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:41 am to goofball
That Mustang ll? No, this worked over one. Hell Yea.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:42 am to goofball
Wow that looks like a clunker.
That carpet tho...
That carpet tho...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News