Started By
Message

re: Would u pay 17 extra cents a gallon if you knew that 100% went to roads and bridges?

Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:35 am to
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19467 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Would u pay 17 extra cents a gallon if you knew that 100% went to roads and bridges?




those funds surely won't ever be misappropriated
Posted by fatboydave
Fat boy land
Member since Aug 2004
17979 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:36 am to
Hell no. TIME-D tax Roemer passed was pissed away on stupid crap including salaries for the DOTD shovel-leaners and not spent on roads. Same thing will happen with this retard in the mansion!
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171949 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:40 am to
In Texas, we have nice roads and cheap gas.
Posted by tke857
Member since Jan 2012
12195 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:42 am to
i saw this yesterday. If 17cents meant perfect roads....a new miss bridge....improved interstate system....and metropolitan type public transit then yes I would be for it.

Unfortunately all it will do is fix some potholes here and there and thats it. This money will mostly go towards balancing the budget. Not improvements to the road infrastructure. So no I will not be pleased if this gets passed.
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
22281 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:53 am to
quote:

A guarantee that the following projects would be COMPLETED in the next 5 years:
New Mississippi River bridge near Plaquamine


There is no way that can happen. The construction alone is easily over 4 years of work and design hasn't started yet, let alone the permitting and land acquisition.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48668 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:55 am to
quote:

There is no amount of fat that can be trimmed to pay for the billions in backlogged transportation needs. Not in this life or the next.



That is a democrat excuse. While what your saying may or may not be true, that still doesn't mean that they need to do it.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48668 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:56 am to
quote:

In Texas, we have nice roads and cheap gas.




No you don't, your roads are no better than Louisiana. I am tired of hearing this damn lie.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133421 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 7:58 am to
quote:

if you knew that 100% went to roads and bridges?
They already fooled us once with that promise.

Who knew that dedicated money going to the State Police retirement fund was going to "roads and bridges"??
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91271 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:00 am to
This will never pass the public vote when the supporters have come out and stressed how much money will go to Baton Rouge.
Posted by ShrevetownTiger
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2007
3000 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:01 am to
It amazes me that people still fall for dedicated funds.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133421 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:02 am to
quote:

This will never pass the public vote
One of the bills being introduced does not require a statewide vote, only 2/3 of each house of the legislature to approve it.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171949 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:05 am to
quote:



No you don't, your roads are no better than Louisiana. I am tired of hearing this damn lie.




DFW is constantly widening and repaving roads all over. The toll roads are pristine, outside of Dallas north which is being widened and repaired. I work all over east Texas and even roads in the sticks are nicer than what we had in Louisiana. It's not a lie.
Posted by Indubitably
Member since Jul 2015
55 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:12 am to
The department of transportation is completely self funded by the existing gas tax. No money comes from the general fund. There is no way for the legislature to take away money they don't give.
Posted by Brian Wilson
Member since Mar 2012
2357 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:15 am to
Absolutely yes
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41630 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:18 am to
No
I'd want the lions share of taxes we pay now to go to roads and bridges before we gave the same people more money to burn through.

Has this administration shown any fiscal discipline? Are we concentrating the revenues we currently have on basic services? Or are we still funding pork Barrell projects? Are they still sponsoring large corporate welfare programs with little oversight?

We just raised sales tax to record levels, and that wasn't enough. Don't give them more before they show some discipline.
Posted by thegambler
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
2018 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:22 am to
Something needs to be done. The gas tax has not been increased or adjusted for inflation since the 1980s. The cost just to maintain what we have has increased significantly since the 1980s, much less the cost to build anything new. If nothing is done, the traffic situation will get worse because the state won't be able to pay to maintain what's already in place.


The only tax we pay that goes to roads is the gas tax and that amounts to less than $150 per year in state taxes.

Posted by tke857
Member since Jan 2012
12195 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Something needs to be done. The gas tax has not been increased or adjusted for inflation since the 1980s. The cost just to maintain what we have has increased significantly since the 1980s, much less the cost to build anything new. If nothing is done, the traffic situation will get worse because the state won't be able to pay to maintain what's already in place.


Let's see a clear and transparent plan laid out on what improvements will be made and how the money will be spent. Give us a 2-4-6yr plans. Then i'd consider a raise. Don't think I'd be on board for 17cents though. Maybe 10 if the right plan is in place.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 8:24 am
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:24 am to
quote:

No.

Trim the fat. No new taxes.


This.

Posted by adamb2151
Houston, Texas
Member since Jun 2013
6586 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:25 am to
Absolutely I would vote for the tax if I still lived in BR. However they have tried this before and it always gets voted down. Typical BR. Bitch about infrastructure, traffic, schools etc, but vote down a a tax to fix said problems every time. How do people there expect for the place to improve without the taxpayers paying for it?
Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
7279 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 8:28 am to
I would. But it probably will not pass until DOTD starts closing rural bridges and letting roads revert to the parishes.... which will happen without an increase for maintenance.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram