- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Worst Decisions in World History
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:32 pm to TigerFanatic99
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:32 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
2) The Burning of the Library of Alexandria
It might’ve been filled with porno and coloring books
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:32 pm to biglego
quote:
I always see the sack of Baghdad mentioned as a reason why Islam is so backward
It's a reason, among many, that Arabs lagged behind Turks and Persians in West Asia afterwards. Turco-Persian culture dominated West and Central Asia up until the 20th century, and in some areas, are still dominant. It's effect might be overstated, but it represented a total collapse of the Arab culture that developed after the Umayyads. Other areas under Islamic rule developed independently.
This post was edited on 6/25/19 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:38 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
quote:
The world would look a hell of a lot different if Phocas hadn't murdered Maurice in 602 AD.
How do you think it would be different?
The final Byzantine-Sasanian War wouldn't have been nearly as costly for either side (or happened at all), and both would've been able to swat the Arabs storming out of the desert aside without much problem. It was one of the most destructive wars in world history between the fall of the Western Empire and the late Middle Ages. The nascent version of Islam would've had trouble doing anything more than unifying the Arab peninsula. The Slavs don't get a permanent foothold in the Balkans, either. Their timing couldn't have been worse on that one.
This post was edited on 6/25/19 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:39 pm to OMLandshark
Assassination of Lincoln
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:40 pm to Rockbrc
Bo Rein going on that recruiting trip.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:43 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
It’s what I’m discussing.
Do none of you have reading comprehension? He is referring to the delay of the "final push to Moscow," i.e. Hitler's rerouting of panzer elements to assist Army Group South. You said:
quote:
6) Hitler invading Yugoslavia delaying Operation Barbarossa by a month and a half
These are not the same thing. These are totally separate events.
quote:
When Napoleon took Moscow, there wasn’t a mass train and intellectual industrial complex there. You take Moscow in WWII though, where are the Russians going to go? It’s not like you take the Csar out of Moscow and the troops defend him. How is Stalin going to get out secure communications and supply lines to his people if Moscow isn’t intact.
Nobody is arguing that Moscow was not an extremely valuable military objective...
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:46 pm to OMLandshark
Nicholas didn’t trust Rasputin. He was just too preoccupied and indecisive to do anything.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 11:50 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
John Lennon meeting Yoko Ono
They would’ve broken up eventually anyway. At least she inspired a few songs.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 11:58 pm to Mr Personality
quote:
Nicholas didn’t trust Rasputin. He was just too preoccupied and indecisive to do anything.
His wife did. He was a very loving father and her a loving mother, and Rasputin took advantage of their love for each other and their hemophiliac child. Nicolas didn’t like Rasputin, but he took his advice to the destruction of his own family and country. Thinking it through, few families have been fricked over and more demonized than the Romanovs. I feel bad for the final two generations and their fates.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:00 am
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:01 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
He was far from the first nor will he be the last to do this. The only thing that sits him apart is he was the first to go about it from an industrial standpoint.
so you agree it was a bad decision or no
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:01 am to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
The final Byzantine-Sasanian War wouldn't have been nearly as costly for either side (or happened at all), and both would've been able to swat the Arabs storming out of the desert aside without much problem.
If I recall, Heraclius also stopped paying tribute to the Arab chieftains after the Persian war due to strained finances. That clearly became a problem. I think both the Byzantines and Persians employed Arab mercenaries who proved unreliable in the battles against their kinsmen.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:07 am to OMLandshark
Nicholas is a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church now so it has been amended as much as possible
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:07 am to arkyhawk
quote:
so you agree it was a bad decision or no
It was a bad decision, but there are at least 5 bad decisions that directly led to the Holocaust. As atrocious as it is, if you take out any of the bad decisions I listed that took place within the lifetime of the Holocaust, it doesn’t occur.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:10 am to Mr Personality
quote:
Nicholas is a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church now so it has been amended as much as possible
Reading through history, I just can’t help but feel terrible for the Romanovs, especially because of what followed them. It’s just as if history damned them from the start. I feel very sympathetic towards them.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:12 am
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:21 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
Creation is ALL God.
K
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:34 am to OMLandshark
quote:
1) Assassinating Archduke Francis Ferdinand
That ended up benefitting the Serbs, so I don't see how it was a bad decision from the standpoint of the people who made it.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:42 am to eScott
quote:
Abraham sleeping with Hagar
For the win, in light of the last 40+ years.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:46 am to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
One single atom is even too complex to “fly together” over billions of millennia, even if the raw material to do so was readily available
Wait.. what?
I’m not here to get into a religious debate.. just to point out that Isaac Newton called this mysterious force “gravity” about 300 years ago.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:54 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Retard Alert
Yeah... OK buddy. The people who believe in God are retarded? At least we have an explanation for creation, as opposed to y’all who believe creation just sprang from completely... NOTHING. Then when your theories and hyperboles are proven wrong by the very science y’all rely so heavily on and worship, the only answer you can give is “well, let’s just add another billion years on”. Meanwhile the Bible has never been proven wrong in even the simplest of things and has remained unchanged through the centuries. Tell me, how many times has your science textbooks changed over the past even 20 years? A LOT. As a matter of fact, the more truth (as in NOT hypothesis or theories, which would be laws if they were proven true) we find in science, the more it falls in line with the Bible. There is no denying that fact. It takes more faith to believe in the theories of evolution and the Big Bang, which are outliers compared to true, proven, real science than it ever does believing in a creator. So who’s really pushing fairy tales?
If people would learn critical thinking in science and think things through for themselves without buying every piece of crap OPINION some libtard professor let’s fall off off their forked tongue, people would see that the Bible is right. And real, proven science supports it, not proves it wrong.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:56 am to OMLandshark
quote:It's sad that you can't even discuss this or make a relevant point without calling the other people "delusional idiots". You immediately lose all arguments when you result to insults to try to make your point, regardless of how valid that point may be.
Because I’m not a delusional idiot that thinks the world is 6,000 years old.
Popular
Back to top


0



