- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Women don’t get enough shame how sexual deviant they are
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:49 pm to Lsupimp
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:49 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
That's a nice theory, but not really how it worked. Being social animals and being in a male hierarchy, if one monopolized the women, one got a target on one's back and a spear in the chest on the next hunt. Cooperation within the hierarchy is and always has been the key to human relationships and hierarchies. The guy who monopolized the women to the detriment of the other men in his tribe got eliminated. And tribal leaders would monopolize in a much smarter way anyhow, by sending their competition into battle. See the Vikings.
The key word here is "hierarchy". Know your place, and you are good.
One man can handle only so many women at a time. Fewer and fewer as you get older.
But the issue is the choice being made by the female. Way back when in the prehistoric days, they had no choice. They had no choice up until about 200 years ago.
They were chosen, not the chooser.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:50 pm to Stinger_1066
quote:
No, it does not suck for the guy. Quite the opposite.
Of course the act of sex doesn’t suck for the guy. But, at least to me, a lot of the fun is knowing that I’m able to give pleasure to my SO. I think it would be a pretty big confidence shot to know going into it that you couldn’t do it for her if the batteries ran out or something
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:52 pm to grizzlylongcut
That’s why I keep saying y’all need to work on your skills 
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:53 pm to Aspercel
quote:
That’s why I keep saying y’all need to work on your skill
always practicing, trying to get it right
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:54 pm to Aspercel
I practice as often as I can with the Mrs.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:01 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Being social animals and being in a male hierarchy, if one monopolized the women, one got a target on one's back and a spear in the chest on the next hunt.
This is where modern notions of "honor", "saving face" and "fairness" come from. If nothing else, a leader would have had to have some reputation of this to lead among peers, at least, as well as a demonstrated record of successful leadership.
Otherwise, he would get fragged or otherwise "dealt with" by the next tier down.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:07 pm to Stinger_1066
That’s just factually incorrect for the 99.9 % of people who weren’t nobility. The men didn’t “ take” , they courted. The Greeks and Romans wrote endlessly of this.
In fact the vast majority of men had to compete non stop to access sex. The data ( Google it ) shows that 30-40% of men in world history never reproduced.That number would be about 15% or less for women. And “ excess “ men were exiled or sent off to war . They were excess fodder for war. Women were FAR from these hapless victims these simplistic threads portray them as. They have ALWAYS been the sexual selection gatekeepers and men have always been the relationship gatekeepers. Obviously, excluding the 1% of nobility, kings, queens, conquerors etc.
In fact the vast majority of men had to compete non stop to access sex. The data ( Google it ) shows that 30-40% of men in world history never reproduced.That number would be about 15% or less for women. And “ excess “ men were exiled or sent off to war . They were excess fodder for war. Women were FAR from these hapless victims these simplistic threads portray them as. They have ALWAYS been the sexual selection gatekeepers and men have always been the relationship gatekeepers. Obviously, excluding the 1% of nobility, kings, queens, conquerors etc.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:09 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
So because men have historically (and biologically) wanted to have as many sexual partners as possible, women should do the same? Is that what you’re arguing?
Actually no. What I'm arguing is men take pride in how many women they've had sex with. And some call women who have sex with many men sluts and dirty and not deserving of them, whatever. In fact you see the term whore or slut thrown around all the time on OT posts. It is a double standard. Now women may look for a man whom they can fall in love with, marry, have a family blada, blada, blada. But some women now may just want sex partners in the same way men do until they settle down if they ever do. And I think it has evolved as this specifically and the overt nature of it (the video) in the internet era.
Yeah, I believe there is some biological hardwiring of this also.
Finally, I can't vouch for how the modern female feels about this. Perhaps they can chime in.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:12 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
Vagina to anal vibrating dildos
wtf are you talking about?
Is English your first language?
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:12 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
I’m arguing that it is specifically because of the difficult childbirth and unequal burden of nurturing that has historically and still does fall to the mother that women should be more selective of the father of their children
I'd say with the advent of abortion on demand and the shamelessness about it and myriad other ways to prevent pregnancy, this is becoming a non issue.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:14 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
And some call women who have sex with many men sluts and dirty
No, we just call them aTmTexasDillo’s mom
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:17 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
No, we just call them aTmTexasDillo’s mom
Dillo's mom has been dead for years. She was a nurse in the US Army during WWII.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:18 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
She was a nurse in the US Army during WWII.
then we know she got around
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:20 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
then we know she got around
She may have. May have been ahead of her time.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:21 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
She may have. May have been ahead of her time.
just kidding witcha baw
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:23 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
The social science show that men find women who have had many sexual partners to be poor candidates for long term relationships and women find men who have had many sexual partners to be better candidates for long term relationships.
This is because we value different things. A man wants that respect and loyalty first and foremost while a woman want that hierarchical status of having a high value man. And high value men leverage their sexual opportunities. And there are very logical reasons for this which serve both sexes.
A woman wants a man other women want. This is her sexual selectivity at play. It’s not about money ( it is an indicator) it’s about male status within the hierarchy. A man wants a woman who is his alone, that’s his relationship selectively at work. He doesn’t care about her status in the same way. In fact, it can work against her because men can be insecure about women leaving them for more desirable men so they opt out early.
This is because we value different things. A man wants that respect and loyalty first and foremost while a woman want that hierarchical status of having a high value man. And high value men leverage their sexual opportunities. And there are very logical reasons for this which serve both sexes.
A woman wants a man other women want. This is her sexual selectivity at play. It’s not about money ( it is an indicator) it’s about male status within the hierarchy. A man wants a woman who is his alone, that’s his relationship selectively at work. He doesn’t care about her status in the same way. In fact, it can work against her because men can be insecure about women leaving them for more desirable men so they opt out early.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:25 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
just kidding witcha baw
I'm okay. I actually enjoy the wide ranging discussion here. I've become a bit of a tolerant person with regard to women's proclivities. I won't call them names or judge them.
But I would be appalled if my wife was or daughters are sluts. No sluts in my family.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 3:29 pm to BoogaBear
Super Dave Osborne's Vibrator Joke:
Popular
Back to top



1







