- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:58 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I’m pretty sure universities could still expel students at their leisure, so this is a bit of an odd comparison.
Universities that receive federal or state funding? I seriously doubt it.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:01 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Universities that receive federal or state funding? I seriously doubt it.
I mean universities during the reign of King Henry VIII.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:01 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Also, $110M is insane.
It most certainly isn't. A large percentage of these type cases/accusations are levied with intent to damage or destroy someone's reputation, often resulting in them losing their jobs, homes, ability to find gainful employment in their field, etc. We have a media foaming at the mouth to run any and every such story that pops up, complete with names, mugshots, and commentary. You'd be extremely lucky to get that same media to even post a follow up, much less a complete retraction. None of that would have happened without the fabricated accusations. So, yeah......they should sue for everything the accuser has or will ever have.
This post was edited on 9/17/23 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:01 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I mean universities during the reign of King Henry VIII.
Oh lol, sorry I misunderstood the point you were making.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:03 pm to LegendInMyMind
Not only that, once a rape accusation is shown to be false, the accuser’s name needs to be published so we can drag her name and reputation through the mud.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 1:14 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Oh lol, sorry I misunderstood the point you were making.
Haha all good
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:01 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I’m pretty sure universities could still expel students at their leisure, so this is a bit of an odd comparison.
I’m talking about institutional processes and frankly it’s shameful that a modern American university’s due process, set forth or influenced by the federal government, would ever be less than the due process under a middle age tyrant.
But you’re alright with that lol
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:06 pm to 777Tiger
HR is fully woke. It’s a shell of what it was just 15 years ago. Glad I’m retired.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:08 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Seeing as he was found innocent in court, I hope he gets every penny and more.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:31 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
She should be in prison right now.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 2:45 pm to biglego
quote:
I’m talking about institutional processes and frankly it’s shameful that a modern American university’s due process, set forth or influenced by the federal government, would ever be less than the due process under a middle age tyrant. But you’re alright with that lol
No I’m not, lol. I’ve actually represented kids going through the process. Have you? Note that in my first post on this thread, I said “the disciplinary hearing isn’t worth discussing, as they are just obscene violations of normal due process.”
Doesn’t make your reference to Henry VIII any less silly in this context.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 3:15 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I’ve actually represented kids going through the process. Have you?
No, I’ve only represented falsely accused men in criminal court. but it’s the power of the state regardless. One ruins your career, the other ruins your life.
quote:
I said “the disciplinary hearing isn’t worth discussing, as they are just obscene violations of normal due process.”
Ok so we agree
quote:an American university affords less due process than a medieval tyrant, based on federal policy. If you dont like the comparison then fine whatever. I think it’s pretty disturbing.
Doesn’t make your reference to Henry VIII any less silly in this context.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 5:02 pm to biglego
quote:
Even in the reign of Henry VIII, a monster who routinely had wives and political opponents beheaded, a charge of treason required the direct testimony of two accusers.
so you need a witness to your rape?
Posted on 9/17/23 at 5:33 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Yale University, Saifullah Khan
I hope he bends Yale over and goes in dry.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 5:41 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
so you need a witness to your rape?
You should need more than a woman’s word.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 5:41 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Was it the Obama administration that was ordering this or were they riding a wave of well-intentioned but horribly misguided attempts at "equality?"
A Texas outline with a Bama logo and a "Cajun" as a sig pic.
You are none of the above if you're trying to justify what she tried to spin.
Hand in your man card.
It's revoked.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 5:54 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
so you need a witness to your rape?
No but a conviction (or university investigation) oughta take more than just the accuser’s accusation.
There’s an old adage, popular amongst leftist criminal defense attorneys, that it’s better for ten guilty men to go free than one innocent man be convicted. How we handle rape accusations is the one opposite of this ideal. I understand there is a difference between a criminal prosecution and university investigation but its alarming to me that the university process comes from federal law or guidelines.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 5:57 pm to jbird7
quote:
Thanks to “progressives” Accusations are now convictions in the USA.
As long as the msm can broadcast "credible accusations" to push their progressive narratives, it won't change.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 6:09 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
not a lawyer but isn't his suit against her a civil suit? similar to the Goldman's suit against OJ? if so I don't believe the burden of proof is quite as high
The DJT case in NY.
Trumps judge found he had not been shown to have sexually assaulted the accuser, but penalized him for millions in defamation for testifying " I wouldn't have had sex with her because she's not my type".
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News