Started By
Message

re: Wisconsin sex offender charged after talking with investigator who was posing as teen

Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:04 pm to
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Obviously, the guy has an NT74-like thing for too-young chicks.


quote:

You lost me.


NavyTiger74. Poliboard poster who is rumored to like them a bit too young.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

still entrapment by any common sense


How? They aren’t enticing him to commit a crime he normally would commit. He willingly searched out and engaged with what he though was an underage kid.

quote:

the person he was talking to wasn't a teen.


Okay? What does that matter?
Posted by LSU$$$
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
1280 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

an NT74-like thing for too-young chicks


someone explain this to me. I'm old......
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
20372 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

be willing to use actual teenagers as bait



Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

someone explain this to me. I'm old......


See above
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Hammond
Member since Feb 2013
10172 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

someone explain this to me. I'm old......



he is calling out another poster, which is against board rules and could easily lead to a three year suspension of posting rights
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

he is calling out another poster, which is against board rules and could easily lead to a three year suspension of posting rights


In that case, three-fourths of the PoliBoard should be on the bench.
This post was edited on 7/26/18 at 1:13 pm
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Hammond
Member since Feb 2013
10172 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

In that case, three-fourths of the PoliBoard should be on the bench.



just letting you know...I just got back from three years in banland and my offense was a similar comment to yours, based on facts, that called out a few posters who are no longer here
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135032 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

he is calling out another poster, which is against board rules and could easily lead to a three year suspension of posting rights


Yeah...I don’t think that’s how it works.








GrammarKnotsi eats his boogers
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76780 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

still entrapment by any common sense. the person he was talking to wasn't a teen. I would vote in his favor on a jury. He's sick and evil no doubt, but he was talking to an adult.


call it what you want. want to know how this won't ever happen to me?
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Hammond
Member since Feb 2013
10172 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

GrammarKnotsi eats his boogers



Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

GrammarKnotsi eats his boogers


Did you just "call him out"?

Frankly, I always wondered WTF that meant.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135032 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:30 pm to
And he likes it.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36635 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:31 pm to
quote:


In that case, three-fourths of the PoliBoard should be on the bench



We can only hope...
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10758 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

still entrapment by any common sense. the person he was talking to wasn't a teen.


It doesn't matter who he was talking to. The crucial issue is his intent. He intended to solicit a 15 year old girl. Whether he was talking to a pot-bellied 50 year old detective is irrelevant. If he did not take the affirmative step of reaching out to a child for sex, then he would not have been arrested. Not like the detective contacted him and drew him in. Big difference.

Your line of reasoning is disturbing.
This post was edited on 7/26/18 at 1:34 pm
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Hammond
Member since Feb 2013
10172 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:34 pm to
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

still entrapment by any common sense.


No, this is not entrapment. He thought he was talking with a 15 year old, it doesn't matter that she was really an adult.

Entrapment is if police trick you into doing something illegal you normally would not have done. If you had every intention of doing it anyway, it is not entrapment.

For example, if this bozo had said "Hey wait a second, are you sure you're 18? Because I don't fool around with underage chicks" and the cop said "Yes, I really am 21!" then it would be entrapment.

But he went full steam ahead thinking she was underage. Since he was planning to do something criminal entirely on his own, it isn't entrapment.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135032 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:39 pm to
Bringing up something that a poster willingly brought to the board isn’t calling them out
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Hammond
Member since Feb 2013
10172 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Bringing up something that a poster willingly brought to the board isn’t calling them out



perhaps, but the poster who was mentioned is not here saying those things..Like I said, mine was several years ago and I made it a point to let people know that a few posters were not as decorated as they claimed to be..Didn't seem like a big deal, but it was considered personal
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35530 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 1:48 pm to
I hate these things, because it is punishing evil thoughts and intentions without an illegal act, if the girl is actually over the age of consent.

i think most of us tolerate that because the ends justify the means.

always torn with this because how else do you really stop this shite before it's too late????

why the downvotes on this? i made no definitive comments. if you're okay with entrapment then i guess downvote. if you don't have an overwhelming desire to stop pedos, then downvote.
This post was edited on 7/26/18 at 2:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram