- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will we see WW3 or the end of time in the next 4 years?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:36 pm to CatsGoneWild
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:36 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
Iran is really ticked
Israel will deal with Iran before they get close enough to a nuclear bomb. Conventional fight, US would destroy the entire Iranian military capability within a week or 2 at most, barring Russia coming to Iran's defense. But Trump is actively trying to build a good relationship with Putin, so Russia getting involved against the US militarily would be highly unlikely.
Civil war in the US is more likely than any WW3 thanks to all these liberal anarchist groups rioting and destroying shite because they're still melting over the election
0
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:37 pm to CatsGoneWild
When we think of world wars, we think about the images from WW1 & WW2. Planes dropping bombs, tanks, soldiers on the ground going to head to head battle. That is something I doubt we ever see again.
With a global market, is there any reason that would be in the best interest of any super power country to go to war with another?
Of course, while I keep up with current events and international relations, I don't know if there are any relationships between countries that could possibly result in any type of international war. But I think having nuclear weapons and other advanced weapons actually make the world safer because no one wants to create an environment where using these weapons would be more likely.
With a global market, is there any reason that would be in the best interest of any super power country to go to war with another?
Of course, while I keep up with current events and international relations, I don't know if there are any relationships between countries that could possibly result in any type of international war. But I think having nuclear weapons and other advanced weapons actually make the world safer because no one wants to create an environment where using these weapons would be more likely.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:38 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
We have a lot of countries upset and now Iran is really ticked. I'm worried trump is going to turn the world against us. And this is only after a few weeks.
well you should probably go ahead and kill yourself, then.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:42 pm to rintintin
quote:
It's a world economy. The major powers rely so much on each other for economic reasons it'd be economic suicide to start WW3.
The foreign policy experts said the same exact things regarding a war between the major powers in the years running up to WWI and cited the same exact reason you have here.
The only time War will become unthinkable is when the human population on the planet drops below the number two.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:49 pm to CatsGoneWild
Will this negatively effect football recruiting?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:55 pm to CatsGoneWild
Concern troll.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 2:03 pm to CatsGoneWild
Less likely now that Obama is gone.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 2:10 pm to Landmass
quote:
Less likely now that Obama is gone.
Are you saying Trump would be less likely to get us into a war than Obama?
And before anyone accuses me of being a "liberal", just a reminder.. I consider myself "independent". I am a registered republican so from a technical standpoint I consider myself a "moderate republican" so I am not saying this because I was a die hard Obama fan or anything (like every other president, he wasn't perfect. I would consider him to be an average president).
Posted on 2/10/17 at 2:32 pm to CatsGoneWild
I voted for Kasich
Posted on 2/10/17 at 2:39 pm to OweO
quote:
Are you saying Trump would be less likely to get us into a war than Obama?
We are very luck Obama didn't stumble and fumble us into WWIII. Seriously, our foreign policy during his time as POTUS was the biggest disaster of the the past 100+ years. He was a damn fool and had equally stupid fools as Secretary of State.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:10 pm to IceTiger
quote:
crap
it is
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:13 pm to Tigeralum2008
Good point but, i'm pretty sure we have a bunch of nerds to combat that.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 3:15 pm to bigrob385series
quote:
Iran is really ticked
frick em.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 6:06 pm to Darth_Vader
Not entirely true
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:16 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
I think a civil war of some fashion in America is more probable than an all out WWIII but admittedly, I don't know shite
How do you decide sides. It's not like you have regions that are opposed. Conservatives are spread out all over the place, liberals are all in the cities.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:24 pm to knight_ryder
Russia only has ONE aircraft carrier?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:28 pm to CatsGoneWild
F them all. I'm old, have bad feet and probably will not be drafted. I say we F up some countries an settle some scores! 
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:31 pm to Tigerbait337
Numero uno 
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:32 pm to knight_ryder
Translation: bring it the frick on.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 8:03 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
fact, if it breaks out in Europe, it will be over before we can even put anything resembling an effective force in the field.
I don't think you understand what world War means.
A conflict contained in Europe that is over before we get involved is not a world war
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News