- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:48 pm to lsuhunt555
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:48 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
Right? I don't understand the issue. One man shot an unarmed man 7 times in the back. That seems to me like a pretty steep hill to climb to call it justified.
You didn't know? If you get into a fight with two guys outside of your car you can shoot them. That's what I learned in this thread.
2
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:49 pm to lsuhunt555
"Unarmed" but he was reaching for his gun
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:49 pm to TigahJay
quote:
"Unarmed" but he was reaching for his gun
ORLY
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:50 pm to TigahJay
quote:
"Unarmed" but he was reaching for his gun
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:50 pm to TigahJay
quote:
but he was reaching for his gun
Reaching =/= armed
And I'm not saying the defense can't climb that hill, im just saying it seems steep.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:50 pm to Fun Bunch
You think he wasn't? 
that part is pretty clear
that part is pretty clear
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:51 pm to Fun Bunch
You better stick to contract law or whatever you generally practice.
According to your posts the only evidence that matters is Hayes shot Smith and everything else is irrelevant. You keep going on about case law. Not one person in that jury is going to read case law to determine their verdict.
According to your posts the only evidence that matters is Hayes shot Smith and everything else is irrelevant. You keep going on about case law. Not one person in that jury is going to read case law to determine their verdict.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:51 pm to lsuhunt555
The PT testimony is painting Hernandez as the aggressor. This gives the defense a lot more credibility to claim self defense.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:52 pm to TigerFred
I agree with Fred
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:52 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
If you get into a fight with two guys outside of your car you can shoot them.
of course you "can"
"should you" is another question
as well as "will you get a free trip to jail for it?"
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:52 pm to Fun Bunch
Can you or anyone else give me a brief rundown of how this case will play out? I'm not talking about predicting a verdict or anything, but after the questions today, then what?
Just a little ignorant of the legal system
Probably a stupid question
Just a little ignorant of the legal system
Probably a stupid question
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:53 pm to TigahJay
quote:
that part is pretty clear
There's never been any indication at any level that he was physically REACHING for anything
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:53 pm to TigahJay
quote:
The PT testimony is painting Hernandez as the aggressor. This gives the defense a lot more credibility to claim self defense.
but not aggressive toward Hayes, who then shot the guy who wasn't being aggressive.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:54 pm to TigahJay
quote:
This gives the defense a lot more credibility to claim self defense.
Im still having a hard time understanding why someone shot 7 times in the back is a threat.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:54 pm to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
Did they find a gun in Smith's car?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:55 pm to lsuhunt555
Can you defend yourself just because someone is potentially arming themselves?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:55 pm to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
quote:
but not aggressive toward Hayes, who then shot the guy who wasn't being aggressive.
Thats another point. Guy 1 swings on Guy 2, and that apparently justifies Guy 3 killing Guy 4? That doesnt make any sense to me.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:56 pm to lsupride87
If it is so irrelevant and only case law matters the DA must really suck. If all that testimony is being given without an objection by the DA when only case law matters then there is no chance Hayes gets convicted.
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:56 pm to Fun Bunch
He said he was going to get his gun. He was already back in the car with the door open and the gun was within reach between the drivers seat and the console. You don't think that indicates reaching? What do you think he was doing, twiddling his thumbs?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 12:56 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:Really?
Im still having a hard time understanding why someone shot 7 times in the back is a threat.
Can't think of anything?
Page 62 of 248
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News