- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will "Learn to Weld" become the new "Learn to Code" with AI coming for the coding jobs?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:20 am to goldennugget
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:20 am to goldennugget
I heard an interesting analogy about AI. If a legit moron has an IQ of 70 an absolute genius like Einstein or Da Vinci are basically like 2.5 morons. AI is hundreds of millions of Einsteins and its instantaneous . And it’s an arms race between the U.S. and China and there’s every incentive and trillions of dollars in play. But yeah, coders are safe, you know, because they are special.
You think there is any room for a young lawyer to research cases? Writers? Advertising people? Insurance underwriters? Actuaries? Professors? Accountants ? Bankers? Financial investors? It’s endless how many professions will be absolutely dead in the water by 2028, let alone 2048. This is a sea change- like the Industrial Revolution but it’s going to be absolutely SUDDEN.
Mystery is Margin and there will be no more mystery. Everyone will now be an expert in everything.
You think there is any room for a young lawyer to research cases? Writers? Advertising people? Insurance underwriters? Actuaries? Professors? Accountants ? Bankers? Financial investors? It’s endless how many professions will be absolutely dead in the water by 2028, let alone 2048. This is a sea change- like the Industrial Revolution but it’s going to be absolutely SUDDEN.
Mystery is Margin and there will be no more mystery. Everyone will now be an expert in everything.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:23 am to Lsupimp
quote:
think that’s what you want to believe
It's a fundamental misunderstanding of how AI works. Common theme in these threads, no offense to you.
In that scenario you laid out, AI was effective because of the prompts it was fed. People who already were intimately familiar with the code and had an idea of what the issue was, what was the expected behavior, etc. gave all that information to AI. I assure you there was a shite ton of back and forth and trial and error involved.
People in these threads act like AI would detect some random issue in the code, find it, fix it, without input and prompting. It is only as good as the information being fed to it. In the same scenario, the team of coders could have told AI the code was fine and working as desired and it would have persisted the issue forever.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 9:27 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 am to BoogaBear
quote:and today, it is the worst it will ever be.
but it still requires lots of hand holding to accomplish that
It gets exponentially better every year.
Is it AGI? Obviously not.
But that is also inevitable
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 9:29 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:28 am to BoogaBear
quote:
People in these threads act like AI would detect some random issue in the code, find it, fix it, without input and prompting. It is only as good as the information being fed to it. In the same scenario, the team of coders could have told AI the code was fine and working as desired and it would have persisted the issue forever.
Right - this is what I always tell folks that are concerned by AI taking their jobs. It's actually NOT some all knowing, all powerful magical oracle that can just do whatever you ask it. It still cannot think like a human brain despite all the bullshite that AI companies keep trying to sell the general public.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:31 am to BoogaBear
Appreciate your comments. The point is a TEAM is no longer required. Where you had a thousand now you have 100. It’s just the nature of AI. We will still need lawyers, just not one every five feet. Coders are no exception to this, especially over time as AI begins self correction and adaptation.
I am not a coder obviously and you’ve forgotten more about it then I know, but I do listen to the AI experts and futurists and believe I know exactly where this is headed; mass depopulation, universal income, sophisticated game theory as business strategy , survival of the fittest. A three decade process of reorganizing society on a fundamental level.
I am not a coder obviously and you’ve forgotten more about it then I know, but I do listen to the AI experts and futurists and believe I know exactly where this is headed; mass depopulation, universal income, sophisticated game theory as business strategy , survival of the fittest. A three decade process of reorganizing society on a fundamental level.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:34 am to msutiger
quote:
I think the massive push towards blue collar jobs is a mistake. I don’t know if some of you have been paying attention but we have flood the country with manual labor over the past 10 years.
Also, if every young kid goes to blue collar work it will saturate the market just like has happened with coding. Programmers are a dime a dozen.
With all that negativity, I don’t know what the answer is, because AI is inevitably coming for a lot of white collar jobs.
The push to trades is the same, age old idea of the elite that education is wasted on all but the elite. People like Mike Rowe, the ring leader, have never worked a trade job a week in their life...certainly have not done so when the weather wasn't perfect. Mike Rowe was a fricking opera singer for fricks sake...anyone who listens to an opera singer extolling the virtues of trade school while vilifying education is a dumb arse. Technology is replacing trade jobs faster than white collar jobs and has been for about 100 years. There is not a trade in the US that requires more skill and knowledge today than it did 20 years ago and the skill and knowledge required 20 years ago wasn't comparable to what was required 20 years prior to that. None. As the requirement for skill goes down the number of qualified candidates goes up.
I think the terror associated with AI is blown out of proportion. Technology has replaced workers at a rapid clip from the first time one of our ancestors stood on their hind legs and said "damn, the view is great from up here....my back hurts". Technology creates different jobs, almost always better jobs....its often painful for the individual for some period of time but most have managed to overcome over the centuries, its doubtful this won't hold true with AI. I may be wrong, we all may be doomed, but typewriter repairmen did not starve to death, they moved on....and so will the majority of us.....
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:37 am to Lsupimp
quote:Not all of their Einsteins are named Albert.
AI is hundreds of millions of Einsteins
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 9:38 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:38 am to Roaad
quote:To program the robot welders?
Where will all the coders go?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:41 am to AwgustaDawg
I fall somewhere in between. I know for a fact AI will cost jobs and it already has. I've been in tech for a while now and the junior level positions are much fewer than they were even 3 years ago. I started as a junior and likely would not be able to get such a job today. I feel for the recent college grads.
But I am not fully sold on AI completely taking over tasks like writing code which will do away with software engineers and developers.
But I am not fully sold on AI completely taking over tasks like writing code which will do away with software engineers and developers.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:44 am to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:
I think his point is that robots are primarily used in shop spaces with production runs. Not in the field. Not saying it can't or won't happen, but a small mom and pop business won't be able to afford the computer driven fabrication machinery. And customers wanting something built on their land won't be able to afford the businesses that owns the AI driven welding operation at least in the near term. There will be a long term need for a good majority of welders. IMO.
Laser welding is quickly becoming very cost effective and almost anyone can become proficient using one in a matter of days instead of months and years. The data is also pretty quickly showing that the end results are better penetration and better welds. Startup costs are still somewhat prohibitive but Lincoln and Miller are both making machines that are under $50k that were around $70k just a few years ago....in about the time it takes someone to become proficient, not employable but proficient in mig welding those machines will be under $40k and by the time they become employable those machines will be under $30k. They also offer the ability to weld just about any material with one machine. At $50k now they aren't out of line with start up costs considering the quality of welds and the range of materials that can be welded with one machine. They havent replaced traditional welding machines yet but they are doing so at an alarming rate of speed.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:44 am to Lsupimp
quote:
I am not a coder obviously and you’ve forgotten more about it then I know, but I do listen to the AI experts and futurists and believe I know exactly where this is headed; mass depopulation, universal income, sophisticated game theory as business strategy , survival of the fittest. A three decade process of reorganizing society on a fundamental level.
The main risk is that AI doing away with junior level roles is that you are ending the pipeline of developing senior level talent. If no one can work a junior level or entry level job, how can they gain the experience to be a senior level or experienced level employee down the line?
Bean counters are so obsessed with using AI to meet the next quarter's profit targets and thats all they care about, they don't care about the long term implications.
I am a senior level employee in the tech world but I don't get here without first cutting my teeth as a junior working entry level jobs. 10-15 years from now companies will be looking to hire experienced workers and won't be able to because they shut out an entire generation from gaining the skills needed to check off the experience boxes. Then they will just say that Americans are lazy and use the fact that there aren't enough experienced Americans (by their own doing) to say we need to import infinity Indians to fill the skill gaps
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:46 am to goldennugget
quote:
I fall somewhere in between. I know for a fact AI will cost jobs and it already has. I've been in tech for a while now and the junior level positions are much fewer than they were even 3 years ago. I started as a junior and likely would not be able to get such a job today. I feel for the recent college grads.
But I am not fully sold on AI completely taking over tasks like writing code which will do away with software engineers and developers.
We are certainly in a transitional period, there is no question about it. The speed and accuracy that AI can do some tasks is fascinating...and will lead to all manner of new products and technology which will eventually employ people....but there is always a lag period.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:46 am to Lsupimp
quote:
I am not a coder obviously and you’ve forgotten more about it then I know, but I do listen to the AI experts and futurists and believe I know exactly where this is headed; mass depopulation, universal income, sophisticated game theory as business strategy , survival of the fittest. A three decade process of reorganizing society on a fundamental level.
We'll be entering this post-work world just about the time I retire
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:48 am to goldennugget
I will be the first to say it. You know what tech jobs are in jeopardy because of AI?
Offshore. India will be gutted by AI. All the menial tasks companies ship offshore for 32 bucks an hour will be done using AI.
That is the type of coding AI can replace and that's a great example. Offshore workers are already robotic, they have to be told exactly what to do and how to do it. Just give the same prompts to AI and no need for offshore any longer.
Offshore. India will be gutted by AI. All the menial tasks companies ship offshore for 32 bucks an hour will be done using AI.
That is the type of coding AI can replace and that's a great example. Offshore workers are already robotic, they have to be told exactly what to do and how to do it. Just give the same prompts to AI and no need for offshore any longer.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:58 am to AwgustaDawg
I am not defending welding. But the cost of replacing a welder with a robot is likely higher than replacing a team of coders with a software license
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:10 am to jdd48
quote:In reality, it's like have an inexperienced employee that is over-confindent, often wrong, and need constant hand holding. The kind of hire that drags the entire team down trying to help them. The kind of hire I work hard to avoid.
Right - this is what I always tell folks that are concerned by AI taking their jobs. It's actually NOT some all knowing, all powerful magical oracle that can just do whatever you ask it
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:13 am to Roaad
Or any other number of skilled labor fields that involves physical work. AI isn't going to put up drywall or fix a transmission.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:13 am to Lsupimp
quote:False. The limiter in creating good software isn't the typing speed of developers. The limiter is figuting out *what* and *how* to build.
The point is a TEAM is no longer required.
quote:Almost always the peopel most confident about AI, are people that don't actually use it.
I am not a coder obviously
quote:You're listening to people selling a product.
but I do listen to the AI experts and futurists
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:14 am to Roaad
Robots will take over the blue collar jobs next.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:16 am to Lsupimp
quote:
I do listen to the AI experts and futurists and believe I know exactly where this is headed
Yeah, because they aren't interested in selling a narrative or anything. You're absolutely right!
Have you ever met coders? If the AI was good as the salesmen claim it to be, the developers would be the first to know!
But I keep hearing "exponential" growth, and AI will do all coding within 6 months (been hearing this since over a year ago).
Meanwhile, I keep arguing with this thing like a shitty offshore coder. It's good for proof-of-concepts, but I'm not going to let it do brain surgery anytime soon.
Popular
Back to top



1








