Started By
Message

re: Will Gentrification Ever Happen in Baton Rouge?

Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:01 am to
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75216 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Sherwood south of Florida


Crazy after all these years that the city hasn’t addressed the issue with Sherwood going down to one lane from Old hammond to Florida.

Have they ever discussed widening lanes?
Posted by BRich
Old Metairie
Member since Aug 2017
2223 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:09 am to
quote:

It's not unimportant due to the Mississippi River and the industrial activity around here but it's also not even top 15 in the US either.

quote:

Although the United States has over 260 inland and coastal ports, roughly 76% of goods by value move through eighteen major port locations. Of the top ten, there are three in Louisiana, three in Texas, two in California and two on the eastern seaboard.


Yep. Semantics and definitions can make the Port situation here in SELA look a lot less than it is in importance.

1. Do a google search on "largest" or "top" Ports and all they come back with are CONTAINER ports, which of course discounts bulk cargo and things like oil.

2. "Port of New Orleans" is only ONE political entity. On the lower Mississippi in Louisiana, there are multiple entities-- Port of Plaquemine, Port of St. Bernard, Port of New Orleans, Port of South Louisiana (river parishes) and Port of Greater Baton Rouge. If you threw just the Port of South Louisiana and Port of New Orleans together, it would be larger than Houston. Throw in the other three and it's the largest by far:
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36047 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I told you the economics of that deal were greatly misunderstood and you proved my point perfectly when you said you heard the government put up most of the funds for construction.

I asked for information as you seemed to be more knowledgeable than I. Perhaps, I did misunderstand the deal.
Now I shouldn’t said the govt. put up more than half the money for construction. I corrected that said they put up 74 million dollars for the project. I got my information here. I don’t know what the construction costs were.

LINK /

quote:

According to the Associated Press, "the project involves about $74 million in public money over 12 years. Louisiana Economic Development is offering $29.5 million over 12 years - including $1.5 million in local money - for workforce costs and facility operation. State, federal and city money will put up a $30.5 million office building on the old Advocate newspaper site. It's to be developed by the Baton Rouge Area Foundation's real estate trust. The state is also providing $14 million over 10 years to increase the number of computer science graduates in Louisiana. At least 65 percent will expand Louisiana State University's computer science division."


You responded to me in a snarky way and asserted things I never said. Why are you so sensitive?

quote:

If you have a problem with the project as a whole, that’s fine. I won’t dispute that. But if you think the developer didn’t have to pass on more profitable projects due to its commitment to the IBM deal, you are mistaken.


All I said was the developer did well. I said that because if all the governmental help they received. If my opinion is wrong show me where. That’s all I ask.

And I never said anything about passing up other opportunities. I don’t know if they did or did not. My interest was in the IBM project only. It was touted as a big deal for EBR, LSU and our community.
This post was edited on 3/23/23 at 11:13 am
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
17013 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:11 am to
No.

The only chance is if a really legit business moved into an area and caused investors to buy up areas and re-do them.

That’s not gonna happen though
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36047 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:17 am to
Thxs fir the information.
Posted by longtooth
Member since Jun 2013
408 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:28 am to
I think the main thing holding back some neighborhoods is the interest rate on mortgages. Parts of Broadmoor were seeing constant, non-flood related renovations and updates prior to that.

I think you are right about Shenandoah. It seems to be in a state of flux. Broadmoor and Sherwood are seeing very similar price ranges for nicer homes. My biggest gripe with Shenandoah is that there are a lot of houses under 2k square feet. And I’m not really a fan of any of the architecture until you start getting into White Oak Landing (where most homes I see for sale are also in need of extensive and expensive renovations).

Sherwood is one of my favorite neighborhoods honestly. It’s got everything you could want in architecture, yard sizes, connectivity and location, etc. but there is just a lot of ghetto apartments nearby.

Someone needs to gentrify all the apartments and duplexes around Sherwood and Shenandoah or just bulldoze. That would make worlds of difference.

Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:31 am to
No. Areas that get rebuilt have charm, character and history.
Posted by Hermit Crab
Under the Sea
Member since Nov 2008
7168 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:36 am to
The geography of BR doesn't help those older areas like in other cities. BR is laid out more linear and that line shifted to I10/st George rather than I12 and farther north.
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1454 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 11:47 am to
quote:

All I said was the developer did well. I said that because if all the governmental help they received. If my opinion is wrong show me where. That’s all I ask.


I probably should’ve started by asking you to clarify what you meant by them doing very well. That’s my fault.

They didn’t really benefit from the 30.5m put up for construction because that basically just covered the cost of the IBM commercial space and parking garage. The rest of the funding you mentioned was dedicated to things like IBM operating expense reimbursements. It’s difficult to carve all of that out and evaluate the rest of the project in a vacuum, but if you did I don’t think it would meet your definition of very well.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54718 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Will Gentrification Ever Happen in Baton Rouge?


What is the ultra high wealth gay population in Baton Rogue?

Seems real big time gentrification needs wealthy gay couples with no kids
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36047 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

They didn’t really benefit from the 30.5m put up for construction because that basically just covered the cost of the IBM commercial space and parking garage. The rest of the funding you mentioned was dedicated to things like IBM operating expense reimbursements. It’s difficult to carve all of that out and evaluate the rest of the project in a vacuum, but if you did I don’t think it would meet your definition of very well.


I was thinking the developers would benefit from IBM because they would have tenants for their apartments, and for their parking. Also initial construction costs for IBM could help with infrastructure costs for the rest of the project.

Also don’t they have paying commercial tenants? That would boost their operation also.

And the lease with IBM will expire one day. At that point that would also benefit the developers, right?

How was it not a good deal?
Posted by Rabby
Member since Mar 2021
577 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 1:41 pm to
We fell for that BS decades ago. After being victimized and facing criminals several times, we figured out what a bad idea this was and left.
Not looking back now.
But there are a lot of young and gullible people out there...
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1454 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

I was thinking the developers would benefit from IBM because they would have tenants for their apartments, and for their parking. Also initial construction costs for IBM could help with infrastructure costs for the rest of the project. Also don’t they have paying commercial tenants? That would boost their operation also. And the lease with IBM will expire one day. At that point that would also benefit the developers, right? How was it not a good deal?


Everything you said here makes perfect sense but at the end of the day you have to generate a return on your investment. If you make some very basic operating assumptions on the residential and commercial space they control, I don’t think it justifies a 42 million dollar investment.
This post was edited on 3/23/23 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51640 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 2:10 pm to
I had been hoping to see some gentrification along 110/Spanishtown. That's good, elevated land and already set into grid patterns (meaning little chance of flooding and easy handling of traffic). The building of more and more Section 8 apartments down there pretty much ixnays that idea.

There may have been a chance at some gentrification along some of the areas you mentioned, but the new bridge and expanded capacity in the 110-12 corridor will likely help facilitate more movement across the river (since south along 10 and east on 12 are at capacity for people to want to look elsewhere).

All that said, I'm really surprised there hasn't been more growth along 61 from the plants to St Francisville yet.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36047 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Everything you said here makes perfect sense but at the end of the day you have to generate a return on your investment. If you make some very basic operating assumptions on the residential and commercial space they control, I don’t think it justifies a 42 million dollar investment.

Would you change your opinion if you considered that after 15 years the ownership gets the building without strings attached? That may be the kicker.

42 million dollars. Cheap money when the invested. The original deal expires around 2030. They could sell the project then? Keep it and make the rent?

Now I don’t know, but the developers surely have their plans. They got a lot of assistance, they were smart enough to do that. I would suspect they were smart enough to put together a good business plan to take advantage of their good fortune.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

It’s a solid, affordable neighborhood that’s isn’t too far from the big employers on Essen, Corporate/Jefferson, and the big industrial facilities in north Baton Rouge. Easy to get to the private schools. It’s not the easiest commute from downtown and LSU though.


If you drive down S.Sherwood past the crackheads and the section 8 housing(the real problem) the office buildings are all being renovated or rebuilt. EFCU is moving its HQ there.
Posted by LSU1SLU
Member since Mar 2013
7104 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 4:00 pm to
people have to move to find good jobs unless they are oil field or plant baws.. what do you expect
Posted by southdowns84
Member since Dec 2009
1454 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Would you change your opinion if you considered that after 15 years the ownership gets the building without strings attached? That may be the kicker. 42 million dollars. Cheap money when the invested. The original deal expires around 2030. They could sell the project then? Keep it and make the rent? Now I don’t know, but the developers surely have their plans. They got a lot of assistance, they were smart enough to do that. I would suspect they were smart enough to put together a good business plan to take advantage of their good fortune.


This is a great point that I meant to comment on earlier. The IBM lease does expire per the agreement, but I still don’t think that changes the equation enough to justify the investment. You’re making a huge sacrifice in the short term and tying up a bunch of capital for a substantial period of time while having very little control over what happens between now and then. I guess they could monetize the future value of that space at a deep discount today, but I doubt there are a bunch of investors waiting in line to have exposure to that cooperative endeavor agreement. They’ve already had to modify it due to IBM not meeting their hiring quota. It’s certainly going to change again.

The developer got a lot of assistance, there’s no question about that. I just think if you run the numbers, they could’ve found a better use for their capital if they were focused on maximizing returns. That developer exists as a support organization for BRAF though, so they have goals beyond just turning a profit.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25360 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

All that said, I'm really surprised there hasn't been more growth along 61 from the plants to St Francisville yet.


Yeah I think they should upgrade 61 to a freeway, at least until the Mississippi state line. Shouldn’t be that difficult now that there isn’t that much on the route yet.

Zachary is booming but it gets rural very quickly north of that.
This post was edited on 3/23/23 at 6:17 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36047 posts
Posted on 3/23/23 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

That developer exists as a support organization for BRAF though, so they have goals beyond just turning a profit.


That developer had been involved in some controversial deals. The exact arrangement they have with BEAF had been called into question before. From what I understand they are not a non profit.

A while back someone did an expose’ of how it all worked. Maybe we can find it.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram