Started By
Message

Why not just let things fail...........

Posted on 10/5/20 at 3:22 am
Posted by sawtooth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2017
3588 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 3:22 am
When did it become such a bad thing to let things fail? We were told that the banks were too big to fail back in 2007 so the tax payers had to bail them out. We had to bail out the auto industry. Bail out the airlines. The federal government even has to bail out the federal government because apparently it’s too big to fail. We have printed trillions of dollars and tossed it down the toilet in an effort to prevent the next great depression. Now it appears we have to print more. Where does it stop?

There once was a company that made wagon wheels. Remember Oldsmobile? The world does not stop turning when businesses and the government go insolvent. It is a natural process. Survival of the fittest.

Louisiana required a billion dollar bailout from the Feds due to it’s own stupid mandates. Take that away and I bet JBE and company does not continue to shutdown the private businesses that keep the lights on at the capitol.
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
17049 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 3:24 am to
quote:

a billion dollar bailout from the Feds
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
17911 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 3:32 am to
quote:

Where does it stop?

Usually with fiscal conservatism... but that doesn't even exist anymore.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18125 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 3:45 am to
And us Libertarians say every time that this is a precedent and it will happen again and again. And it does.
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
1996 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 3:51 am to
People in power admitting they were wrong is a tough pill
Posted by Shepherd
Member since Nov 2009
2947 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 4:15 am to
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41596 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 4:37 am to
Sorry to bring politics to the OT, but if you feel like the bailouts started under republican administrations were bad, think of how terrible they’d be under a Biden socialist democrat-controlled administration.

I agree, bailouts should’ve never happened. We are a capitalist society - if an industry can’t figure out how to survive the economy, then let them fail so others can grow and take advantage of the opportunity. Bailouts were the first major step in the direction of accepting socialism in this country.
This post was edited on 10/5/20 at 4:56 am
Posted by Uptowner
The OP
Member since Oct 2019
2030 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 4:54 am to
quote:

When did it become such a bad thing to let things fail?


Ever heard of Herbert Hoover & the Great Depression?

For a place that gives lip service to the importance of "history," yall sure are ignorant about it.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
11301 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 5:09 am to
Nvm
This post was edited on 10/5/20 at 5:12 am
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 5:34 am to
quote:

Bailouts were the first major step in the direction of accepting socialism in this country.
guess you forgot about social security, welfare food stamps, etc? you must be young.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
12135 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 6:18 am to
Same reason they wanted to rebuild New Orleans after Katrina. Makes zero sense. The inevitable will eventually happen again.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48309 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:17 am to
quote:

We were told that the banks were too big to fail back in 2007


While I agree with your premise in general, it’s important to understand that the government’s intervention into the housing market was the catalyst for the subprime bubble and subsequent collapse. Lenders were not writing subprime mortgages before the creating of Freddie and Fannie - which served as insurers for failed subprimes. Once the risk of loss to the lender was removed, lenders wrote thousands upon thousands of made mortgages.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48309 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:17 am to
quote:

guess you forgot about social security, welfare food stamps, etc?


None of that is socialism
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
5943 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:21 am to
quote:

None of that is socialism


Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79108 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:25 am to
quote:

too big to fail


Always thought that was a misnomer. I think they (whoever they are) mean they are too important to the domestic economy so the government wouldn’t let them fail.

I’m seeing an airline higher up and I told her I wished they didn’t but get a handout bc corporations can’t rely on government to bail their asses out while giving obscene compensations. It ended up being a carryover loan for just shy of 5B.

Naturally, I didn’t get da sex
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48309 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:27 am to
What’s confusing?

Socialism is government control over the means of production and distribution of an industry on behalf of a population.

Redistribution programs are not socialism.

This is economic systems 101.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64559 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:29 am to
quote:

When did it become such a bad thing to let things fail?


It can be traced back to when women were given a political voice. Women are by nature driven by emotion over logic.
This post was edited on 10/5/20 at 7:40 am
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9357 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:34 am to
The term “too big to fail” has become way overused, to the point where it now means “too big to suffer without causing some negative effects for the US stock market.” Notice I said stock market, not economy.

I’m a fan of the Alan Greenspan quote - “if they’re too big to fail, they’re too big.” Unfortunately, national politics are infected by special interest groups.

All of that said, it’s also not as simple as saying we have “flushed trillions down the toilet” with the stimulus packages. There is a point where there are no good options, and I tend to believe the COVID stimulus is the lesser of two evils unfortunately.
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7901 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:35 am to
quote:

We were told that the banks were too big to fail back in 2007 so the tax payers had to bail them out.


Are you familiar with the concept of a bank run? Because that is what we would have been looking at without a bailout.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
5943 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Socialism is government control over the means of production and distribution of an industry on behalf of a population.


That is the simple google search definition of socialism. Socialism also includes reducing the disparity of wealth via distribution.

For those commonly confused about full blown communism, it sets out for equal wealth for the public (unless your in charge )
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram