- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did the 60's/70's have such bad architecture?
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:41 pm to HempHead
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:41 pm to HempHead
quote:
Asymmetrical non-geometric shapes aren't all that pretty to me.
The Sydney Opera House isn't so bad (I rather like it, especially given the location where it actually fits nicely), but I agree with the sentiment though and I'm not a fan of Frank Gehry for instance.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:42 pm to DavidTheGnome
Mid century is very popular right now.
80' ranch is not
80' ranch is not
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:43 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Yes, it is political. Wouldn't that be great if a consequence of the right wing populist movements in the west resulted in a revival of prewar European architecural styles?
Absolutely. I wish the architecture schools and licensing associations didn't have a monopoly on entry. If I could simply sit for an exam without having to have formal education, I'd want to at least try to make something.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:46 pm to 777Tiger
Can we talk about how the inside and outside of the Brady house don't line up?
Second story on the right
Second story on the left
Second story on the right
Second story on the left
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:46 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:
That was an era when aesthetic additions to municipal buildings were impossible to justify in budgets in most cases.
It goes beyond simply municipal buildings and ugly city hall's though. The style and tastes of the era was wretched and the desire to throw off the old (i.e. European looking, and I'm assuming as a result of WW1&2) gave us buildings with no heart and soul.
And the amusing thing is that you'll hear the same art critiques talk about ugly Soviet architecture while idolizing the exact same thing that was taking over the western world.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:49 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Eero Saarinen
It may not work for houses but the guy could make a great looking airport terminal.

Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:51 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
The Sydney Opera House isn't so bad
It's a gorgeous building, in my opinion.
It's also a lot different from some forms of modernist architecture... like Le Corbusier for instance. No thanks.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:54 pm to Evolved Simian
They're still building craptastic buildings in the name of being progressive or modern or something.
I was talking to young architect a few years ago at a function, just light chit chat. I started to complain about a residential building that was just built on Broadway near Freret. I commented about much it really didn't match the neighborhood and looked cheaply done.
She then tells me that she and her firm designed it! Talk about awkward!
Here's a picture of it from street view:
[/url][url=LINK ]pictures upload[/url][/img]
I was talking to young architect a few years ago at a function, just light chit chat. I started to complain about a residential building that was just built on Broadway near Freret. I commented about much it really didn't match the neighborhood and looked cheaply done.
She then tells me that she and her firm designed it! Talk about awkward!
Here's a picture of it from street view:
[/url][url=LINK ]pictures upload[/url][/img]Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:54 pm to DavidTheGnome
I always thought the Kaufman house was awesome.


Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:54 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Richmond VA is also a contender.
Richmond's old city hall is incredible and they moved to that monstrosity.

Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:57 pm to Bill Dauterive
And where's the chimney????
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:58 pm to DavidTheGnome
From a construction standpoint, Brutalist architecture was simple to design, and simple and inexpensive to build.
That's why it was very popular at colleges and universities in the 70's--the hockey-stick growth that they were experiencing during that time required many buildings built quickly and inexpensively to house the growth.
That's why it was very popular at colleges and universities in the 70's--the hockey-stick growth that they were experiencing during that time required many buildings built quickly and inexpensively to house the growth.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 1:58 pm to DavidTheGnome
Nichols State Campus suffers from this. You've got Elkins hall and a couple of the older buildings in the front which are really pretty and collegiate looking, but when they added buildings around the quad, some of the dorms and the library during the 60's, 70's, and 80's, they were terrible. They came to their senses with the nursing building and some of the other new structures. Wish they could facade some of the other shite somehow
Posted on 12/30/16 at 2:00 pm to Jimbeaux
That doesn't bother me at all. Better than trying to fake it to look like other buildings in the area.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 2:03 pm to LSUBoo
Sorry brother, you need to get your eyes checked!
Boo, LSUBoo!

Boo, LSUBoo!
Posted on 12/30/16 at 2:04 pm to DavidTheGnome
this one is a real horror show:


Posted on 12/30/16 at 2:08 pm to Jimbeaux
Well I'm legally blind... but I'm wearing my contacts.
Regardless, that's still a gabillion times better than the brutalist architecture.
Regardless, that's still a gabillion times better than the brutalist architecture.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 2:08 pm to DavidTheGnome
That era looks good compared to the metal buildings that everything is made of now.
Posted on 12/30/16 at 2:10 pm to burgeman
quote:
Has to be one of the ugliest major city halls in the nation.

Popular
Back to top



2







